scholarly journals Potential Benefits of Functional Magnetic Resonance Urography (fMRU) over MAG3 Renal Scan in Children with Obstructive Uropathy

Author(s):  
Bernarda Viteri ◽  
Juan S. Calle-Toro ◽  
Lance Ballester ◽  
Kassa Darge ◽  
Susan Furth ◽  
...  
2017 ◽  
Vol 56 (01) ◽  
pp. 39-46 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ingo G. Steffen ◽  
Grit Neumann ◽  
Ivayla Apostolova ◽  
Juri Ruf ◽  
Anke Rißmann ◽  
...  

Summary Aim: After detection of obstructive uropathy (OU), the indication for or against surgery is primarily based on the differential renal function (DRF). This is to compare functional magnetic resonance urography (fMRU) with dynamic renal scintigraphy (DRS) to assess OU and DRF in infants and children. Patients, methods: Retrospective analysis in 30 patients (female: 16; male: 14; median age: 5.5 years [0.2-16.5]), divided into subgroup A (age: 0-2 years; n = 16) and B (> 2-17 years; n = 14). fMRU was assessed by measuring renal transit time (RTT) and volumetric DRF with CHOP fMRU tool (CT) and ImageJ MRU plug-in (IJ). OU detection by fMRU was compared with DRS (standard of reference) using areas under the curves (AUC) in ROC analyses. Concordant DRF was assumed if absolute deviation between fMRU and DRS was < 5 %. Results: DRS confirmed fixed OU in 4/31 kidneys (12.9 %) in subgroup A. AUC of CT was 0.94 compared with 0.93 by IJ. Subgroup B showed fixed OU in 1/21 kidneys (4.8 %) with AUCs of 0.98 each. RTT measured neither by CT nor by IJ in confirmed fixed OU was < 1200 s – resulting in negative predictive values of 1.0 each. In subgroup A, DRF was concordant in 81.3 % of the kidneys for CT and DRS compared with 75.0 % for IJ and DRS. In subgroup B, CT and DRS were concordant in 91.7 %, and IJ and DRS in 45.8 % of the kidneys. Conclusion: fMRU accurately excluded fixed OU in infants and children, independent from the software used for quantification. However, assessment of DRF with fMRU deviated from DRS especially in infants who may profit most from early intervention. Thus, fMRU cannot fully replace DRS as primary functional examination. If, for clinical reasons, fMRU is performed in first place and it cannot exclude fixed OU, it should be followed by DRS for validation and DRF quantification.


2018 ◽  
Vol 49 (3) ◽  
pp. 351-357 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ilias Tsiflikas ◽  
Florian Obermayr ◽  
Sebastian Werner ◽  
Matthias Teufel ◽  
Jörg Fuchs ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 8 (2) ◽  
pp. 91
Author(s):  
Mohd Ilyas ◽  
Irshad Ahmad ◽  
Insha Khan ◽  
Irfan Robbani ◽  
BaldevS Wazir

2020 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
pp. 37-42
Author(s):  
Nydia Rusli ◽  
Bambang Soeprijanto ◽  
Indrastuti Normahayu

Background : Static fluid Magnetic Resonance Urography (MRU) treats the urinary tract as a static column of fluid, using one of a variety of T2-weighted sequences that exploit the long T2 relaxation time of urine. It does not require the excretion of contrast material and is therefore useful for demonstrating the collecting system and ureter of an obstructed urinary tract. Static fluid MRU provides good morphology visualization and multiplanar three-dimensional reconstruction capability. Aim of study : To display the excellence of static fluid MRU in visualization of dilatated urinary tract segments in pediatric cases with suspectedurinary obstruction. Methods : Nine pediatric patients with suspected obstructive uropathy (as suggested by ultrasound) were included in this case study. The examinations were performed with 1.5T MR scanners using static fluid T2-weighted MRU sequence. Ultrasound examinations were done forall patients. Voiding cystourethrogram was done for 3 patients. Results : Eight studied patients had dilated collecting systems. Static fluid MRU can provide detailed structural assessment of dilatatedcollecting systems. It was superior to ultrasound in evaluation of obstructive double collecting system, ureteral ectopia, ureteral obstructionand massive hydroureteronephrosis.


Urology ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 81 (3) ◽  
pp. 623-628 ◽  
Author(s):  
Prakash Muthusami ◽  
Venkatesan Bhuvaneswari ◽  
Sundararajan Elangovan ◽  
Lalgudi N. Dorairajan ◽  
Ananthakrishnan Ramesh

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document