Anatomic shoulder parameters and their relationship to the presence of degenerative rotator cuff tears and glenohumeral osteoarthritis: a systematic review and meta-analysis

2019 ◽  
Vol 28 (12) ◽  
pp. 2457-2466 ◽  
Author(s):  
Musa B. Zaid ◽  
Nathan M. Young ◽  
Valentina Pedoia ◽  
Brian T. Feeley ◽  
C. Benjamin Ma ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Rotator Cuff ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Rotator Cuff Tears ◽  
Glenohumeral Osteoarthritis

scholarly journals An Evidence-Based Approach to Assess the Accuracy of MRI in Diagnosing Rotator Cuff Tears: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

2019 ◽  
Vol In Press (In Press) ◽  
Author(s):  
Wen-Fei Li ◽  
Tahir Mehmood Shakir ◽  
Yuemei Zhao ◽  
Tao Chen ◽  
Chen Niu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Rotator Cuff ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Rotator Cuff Tears ◽  
Evidence Based

Treatment of Rotator Cuff Tears: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Peter Lapner ◽  
Patrick Henry ◽  
George S. Athwal ◽  
Joel Moktar ◽  
Daniel McNeil ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Rotator Cuff ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Rotator Cuff Tears

scholarly journals Efficacy of concomitant acromioplasty in the treatment of rotator cuff tears: A systematic review and meta-analysis

PLoS ONE ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 13 (11) ◽  
pp. e0207306 ◽  
Author(s):  
Cong Cheng ◽  
Bin Chen ◽  
Hongwei Xu ◽  
Zhongwei Zhang ◽  
Weibin Xu
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Rotator Cuff ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Rotator Cuff Tears

scholarly journals Systematic review on risk factors of rotator cuff tears

2017 ◽  
Vol 25 (1) ◽  
pp. 230949901668431 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrew Arjun Sayampanathan ◽  
Tan Hwee Chye Andrew
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
Systematic Review ◽  
Rotator Cuff ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Random Effect ◽  
Female Gender ◽  
Analysis Data ◽  
Rotator Cuff Tears ◽  
Dominant Hand ◽  
Random Effect Models

Purpose: Rotator cuff tears (RCTs) occur commonly, especially among certain groups of individuals. In this meta-analysis, we aim to identify risk factors for RCTs. Methods: We searched MEDLINE for 210 articles. Seventeen articles were selected for systematic review, of which 10 were eligible for meta-analysis. Data was analysed with Review Manager 5.3, using Mantel–Haenszel statistics and random effect models. Results: A total of 6653 individuals were analysed. The odds of sustaining a RCT on the dominant hand was 2.30 times more than the non-dominant hand (95% confidence interval (CI): 1.01–5.25, Z = 1.99, p = 0.05; Heterogenity: τ2 = 0.38, χ2 = 8.84, df = 2 ( p = 0.01), I2 = 77%). The odds of an individual aged 60 years and above sustaining a RCT was 5.07 times higher than an individual less than 60 years old (95% CI: 2.45–10.51, Z = 4.37, p < 0.001; Heterogenity: τ2 = 0.47, χ2 = 25.24, df = 3 ( p < 0.001), I2 = 88%). Female gender was not a significant association, with an odds ratio of 0.98 when compared to the male gender (95% CI: 0.66–1.45, Z = 0.09, p = 0.93; Heterogenity: τ2 = 0.20, χ2 = 44.24, df = 5 ( p < 0.001), I2 = 89%). Conclusions: Hand dominance and older age are associated with RCTs. More studies are required for further assessment of associations and risk factors of RCTs.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document