scholarly journals Influence of glenoid wear pattern on glenoid component placement accuracy in shoulder arthroplasty

Author(s):  
Kevin A. Hao ◽  
Christopher D. Sutton ◽  
Thomas W. Wright ◽  
Bradley S. Schoch ◽  
Jonathan O. Wright ◽  
...  
2014 ◽  
Vol 15 (4) ◽  
pp. 103-108 ◽  
Author(s):  
Thomas W. Throckmorton ◽  
Wolfgangf Vogt ◽  
Johann Wasmaier ◽  
Jason M. Hurst ◽  
Simon Frostick ◽  
...  

2012 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
pp. 48-55 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joseph P. Iannotti ◽  
Clay Greeson ◽  
Devin Downing ◽  
Vani Sabesan ◽  
Jason A. Bryan

2016 ◽  
Vol 25 (4) ◽  
pp. e90-e95 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ryan P. Mulligan ◽  
Frederick M. Azar ◽  
Thomas W. Throckmorton

2013 ◽  
Vol 95 (24) ◽  
pp. 2205-2212 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anastasios Papadonikolakis ◽  
Moni Blazej Neradilek ◽  
Frederick A Matsen

2018 ◽  
Vol 11 (2) ◽  
pp. 140-148 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alessandro Castagna ◽  
Raffaele Garofalo

Anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty (TSR) has been shown to generate good to excellent results for patients with osteoarthritis and a functioning rotator cuff. Many studies have reported that the glenoid component loosening and failure remain the most common long-term complication of total shoulder arthroplasty. The approach to glenoid component is critical because a surgeon should consider patient-specific anatomy, preserving bone stock and joint line restoration, for a good and durable shoulder function. Over the years, different glenoid design and materials have been tried in various configurations. These include cemented polyethylene, uncemented metal-backed and hybrid implants. Although advances in biomechanics, design and tribology have improved our understanding of the glenoid, the journey of the glenoid component in anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty has not yet reached its final destination. This article attempts to describe the evolution of the glenoid component in anatomic TSR and current practice.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document