Cervical Posterior Spinal Artery Syndrome Caused By Spontaneous Vertebral Artery Dissection: Two Case Reports and Literature Review

Author(s):  
Futao Chen ◽  
Xuemeng Liu ◽  
Tiantian Qiu ◽  
Chunxue Jia ◽  
Min Liu ◽  
...  
2018 ◽  
Vol 15 (6) ◽  
pp. 701-710 ◽  
Author(s):  
Wataro Tsuruta ◽  
Tetsuya Yamamoto ◽  
Go Ikeda ◽  
Masayuki Sato ◽  
Yoshiro Ito ◽  
...  

AbstractBACKGROUNDEndovascular surgery for vertebral artery dissections (VADs) carries the risk of spinal cord infarction (SCI). Although SCI in the region of the anterior spinal artery (ASA) has been reported, SCI in the region of the posterior spinal artery (PSA) is rare.OBJECTIVETo investigate PSA infarction after endovascular surgery for VAD.METHODSInfarction in the region of the PSA after endovascular surgery for VADs carried out in consecutive 21 cases was investigated. The variables of aneurysmal location, status, intra-aneurysmal thrombosis, antithrombotic therapy, and endovascular procedure were investigated in relation to the occurrence of spinal cord or brain stem infarction.RESULTSThirteen cases were unruptured aneurysms, and 8, ruptured aneurysms. The endovascular surgical method was internal trapping in 10 cases, stent-assisted coil embolization in 8 cases, and proximal occlusion (PO) in 3 cases. Periprocedural symptomatic infarction was detected in 4 of the 21 cases (19%): 3 SCIs and 1 lower medulla infarction, after 1 stent-assisted coil embolization and 3 PO. All 3 symptomatic SCIs were PSA infarction. On univariate analysis, the variables of posterior inferior cerebellar artery-involved-type, PO, and intraprocedural proximal flow arrest were significantly correlated with occurrence of PSA infarction.CONCLUSIONPSA infarction after endovascular surgery for VAD seems not to be a rare potential complication. Insufficiency of collateral blood flow and artery-to-artery embolism due to intraprocedural flow stagnation of the VA seem to be the possible mechanisms of PSA infarction in addition to previously reported mechanisms such as direct obliteration by the embolic materials and extended thrombosis of the VA stump.


2017 ◽  
Vol 52 (4) ◽  
pp. 234-239
Author(s):  
Valeria Ripa ◽  
Timur M. Urakov ◽  
Sarah C. Jernigan

2019 ◽  
Vol 59 (4) ◽  
pp. 154-161 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kenichi ARIYADA ◽  
Keita SHIBAHASHI ◽  
Hidenori HODA ◽  
Shinta WATANABE ◽  
Masahiro NISHIDA ◽  
...  

Nosotchu ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 40 (3) ◽  
pp. 195-199
Author(s):  
Mai Okawara ◽  
Hiroyuki Yamaguchi ◽  
Mikiya Ueda ◽  
Takahiro Maeda

2013 ◽  
Vol 27 (4) ◽  
pp. 497.e15-497.e21 ◽  
Author(s):  
Madeline M. Stark ◽  
Nedaa Skeik ◽  
Josser E. Delgado Almandoz ◽  
Benjamin M. Crandall ◽  
David E. Tubman

2007 ◽  
Vol 100 (7) ◽  
pp. 330-338 ◽  
Author(s):  
E Ernst

Objective To identify adverse effects of spinal manipulation. Design Systematic review of papers published since 2001. Setting Six electronic databases. Main outcome measures Reports of adverse effects published between January 2001 and June 2006. There were no restrictions according to language of publication or research design of the reports. Results The searches identified 32 case reports, four case series, two prospective series, three case-control studies and three surveys. In case reports or case series, more than 200 patients were suspected to have been seriously harmed. The most common serious adverse effects were due to vertebral artery dissections. The two prospective reports suggested that relatively mild adverse effects occur in 30% to 61 % of all patients. The case-control studies suggested a causal relationship between spinal manipulation and the adverse effect. The survey data indicated that even serious adverse effects are rarely reported in the medical literature. Conclusions Spinal manipulation, particularly when performed on the upper spine, is frequently associated with mild to moderate adverse effects. It can also result in serious complications such as vertebral artery dissection followed by stroke. Currently, the incidence of such events is not known. In the interest of patient safety we should reconsider our policy towards the routine use of spinal manipulation.


Nosotchu ◽  
2001 ◽  
Vol 23 (4) ◽  
pp. 325-329
Author(s):  
Ken-ichi Katsura ◽  
Yoichiro Hashimoto ◽  
Satoru Orita ◽  
Tadashi Terasaki ◽  
Makoto Uchino

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document