scholarly journals Valve-sparing aortic root replacement can be done safely and effectively in acute type A aortic dissection

Author(s):  
Zara Khachatryan ◽  
Johanna Herajärvi ◽  
Sergey Leontyev ◽  
Michael A. Borger
2019 ◽  
Vol 6 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hug Aubin ◽  
Payam Akhyari ◽  
Philipp Rellecke ◽  
Christina Pawlitza ◽  
George Petrov ◽  
...  

Circulation ◽  
2002 ◽  
Vol 106 (12_suppl_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Rainer G. Leyh ◽  
Stefan Fischer ◽  
Klaus Kallenbach ◽  
Theo Kofidis ◽  
Klaus Pethig ◽  
...  

Background Valve-sparing surgery including the replacement of the sinus of valsalvae were initially meant to be promising approaches in the treatment of acute type A aortic dissection. However, the long-term outcome after valve-sparing aortic root replacement in acute type A dissection is currently the subject of intense debate, and the evidence reported in the literature is sparse. Here we report on our experience on valve sparing aortic root replacement inpatients with acute type A dissection. Methods From August 1995 to November 2000, 30 patients with acute type A dissection received valve-sparing aortic root replacement. Two different techniques were performed: the “remodeling” technique, first described by Yacoub in 1983 (8 patients) and the “reimplantation” technique, initially described by David and Feindel, in 1992 (22 patients). Endpoints of the study were early and late mortality, as well as aortic valve-related complications and reoperations. Results The mean follow-up time was 22.6±15.4 months. The overall 30 day mortality was 17% (5/29) and the late mortality 4% (1/24). During the observation period, 4 patients had to be reoperated (n=3) for acute aortic valve regurgitation after aortic root remodeling and for acute aortic valve endocarditis (n=1) after aortic root reimplantation. In the 3 patients with acute aortic valve regurgitation, symptoms occurred 44, 24, and 17 months after the initial operation in these patients. Intraoperatively prolapsing aortic leaflets because of commissural detachment was found in all 3 cases. In all other patients the latest echocardiographic follow-up examination revealed freedom from aortic regugitation higher than grade 1. Conclusions The high failure rate of aortic root remodeling inpatients with acute type A aortic dissection is discouraging. Whether this technique should be applied in acute type A aortic dissection is questionable. In contrast, aortic root reimplantation lead to favorable midterm outcome. Thus, we recommend consideration of this technique for surgical treatment of patients with acute type A aortic dissection.


2002 ◽  
Vol 123 (2) ◽  
pp. 377-378 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rainer G. Leyh ◽  
Stefan Fischer ◽  
Arjang Ruhparwar ◽  
Mathias Karck ◽  
Wolfgang Harringer ◽  
...  

2016 ◽  
Vol 5 (4) ◽  
pp. 397-400 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stefano Mastrobuoni ◽  
Laurent De Kerchove ◽  
Emiliano Navarra ◽  
Parla Astarci ◽  
Philippe Noirhomme ◽  
...  

2015 ◽  
Vol 99 (3) ◽  
pp. 795-801 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bradley G. Leshnower ◽  
Richard J. Myung ◽  
LaRonica McPherson ◽  
Edward P. Chen

ASVIDE ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 3 ◽  
pp. 314-314
Author(s):  
Stefano Mastrobuoni ◽  
Laurent De Kerchove ◽  
Emiliano Navarra ◽  
Parla Astarci ◽  
Philippe Noirhomme ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Mahmoud Alhussaini ◽  
Eric Jeng ◽  
Tomas Martin ◽  
Amber Filion ◽  
Thomas Beaver ◽  
...  

Objective: Valve-sparing root replacement is commonly used for management of aortic root aneurysms in elective setting, but its technical complexity hinders its broader adoption for acute Type-A Aortic Dissection (ATAAD). The Florida Sleeve (FS) procedure is a simplified form of valve sparing aortic root reconstruction that does not require coronary reimplantation. Here, we present our outcomes of the Florida Sleeve (FS) repair in patients with dilated roots in the setting of an ATAAD. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed 24 consecutive patients (2002-2018) treated with FS procedure for ATAAD. Demographic, operative, and postoperative outcomes were queried from our institutional database. Long term follow-up was obtained from clinic visits for local patients, and with telephone and telehealth measures otherwise. Results: Mean age was 49 ± 14 years with 19 (79%) males. Marfan syndrome was present in 4 (16.7%) patients and 14 (58.3) had ≥2+ aortic insufficiency (AI). Nine (37.2%) had preoperative mal-perfusion or shock. The FS was combined with hemi-arch replacement in 15 (62.5%) patients and a zone-2 arch replacement in 9 (37.5%) patients. There were 2 (8.3%) early postoperative mortalities. Median follow-up period was 46 months (range; 0.3-146). The median survival of the entire cohort was 143.4 months. One patient (4.2%) required redo aortic valve replacement for unrelated aortic valve endocarditis at 30 months postoperatively. Conclusion: FS is simplified and reproducible valve-sparing root repair. In appropriate patients, it can be applied safely in acute Stanford type-A aortic dissection with excellent early and long-term results.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document