Risk prediction models for the development of oral-mucosal pressure injuries in intubated patients in intensive care units: A prospective observational study

2020 ◽  
Vol 29 (4) ◽  
pp. 252-257 ◽  
Author(s):  
Byung Kwan Choi ◽  
Myoung Soo Kim ◽  
Soo Hyun Kim
2021 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Hideki Endo ◽  
Hiroyuki Ohbe ◽  
Junji Kumasawa ◽  
Shigehiko Uchino ◽  
Satoru Hashimoto ◽  
...  

AbstractSince the start of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, it has remained unknown whether conventional risk prediction tools used in intensive care units are applicable to patients with COVID-19. Therefore, we assessed the performance of established risk prediction models using the Japanese Intensive Care database. Discrimination and calibration of the models were poor. Revised risk prediction models are needed to assess the clinical severity of COVID-19 patients and monitor healthcare quality in ICUs overwhelmed by patients with COVID-19.


Seizure ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 43 ◽  
pp. 42-47 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrea Park ◽  
Martin Chapman ◽  
Victoria A. McCredie ◽  
Derek Debicki ◽  
Teneille Gofton ◽  
...  

2004 ◽  
Vol 26 (5) ◽  
pp. 263-267 ◽  
Author(s):  
Franca Vacca ◽  
Monica Vaiani ◽  
Andrea Messori ◽  
Sabrina Trippoli ◽  
Susanna Maltoni ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jamie M Boyd ◽  
Matthew T James ◽  
Danny J Zuege ◽  
Henry Thomas Stelfox

Abstract Background Patients being discharged from the intensive care unit (ICU) have variable risks of subsequent readmission or death; however, there is limited understanding of how to predict individual patient risk. We sought to derive risk prediction models for ICU readmission or death after ICU discharge to guide clinician decision-making. Methods Systematic review and meta-analysis to identify risk factors. Development and validation of risk prediction models using two retrospective cohorts of patients discharged alive from medical-surgical ICUs (n = 3 ICUs, n = 11,291 patients; n = 14 ICUs, n = 11,400 patients). Models were developed using literature and data-derived weighted coefficients. Results Sixteen variables identified from the systematic review were used to develop four risk prediction models. In the validation cohort there were 795 (7%) patients who were re-admitted to ICU and 703 (7%) patients who died after ICU discharge. The area under the curve (AUROC) for ICU readmission for the literature (0.615 [95%CI: 0.593, 0.637]) and data (0.652 [95%CI: 0.631, 0.674]) weighted models showed poor discrimination. The AUROC for death after ICU discharge for the literature (0.708 [95%CI: 0.687, 0.728]) and local data weighted (0.752 [95%CI: 0.733, 0.770]) models showed good discrimination. The negative predictive values for ICU readmission and death after ICU discharge ranged from 94%-98%. Conclusions Identifying risk factors and weighting coefficients using systematic review and meta-analysis to develop prediction models is feasible and can identify patients at low risk of ICU readmission or death after ICU discharge.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document