scholarly journals Predicting the Burden of Knee Arthroplasty Revision Over A 20-Year Horizon

2014 ◽  
Vol 17 (7) ◽  
pp. A388-A389
Author(s):  
M. Comas ◽  
R.E. Guerrero-Ludueña ◽  
M. Espallargues ◽  
M. Coll ◽  
M. Pons ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Knee Arthroplasty ◽  
Arthroplasty Revision

Socioeconomic Issues and Demographics of Total Knee Arthroplasty Revision

2006 ◽  
Vol 446 ◽  
pp. 15-21 ◽  
Author(s):  
Khaled J Saleh ◽  
Edward R Santos ◽  
Hassan M. Ghomrawi ◽  
Javad Parvizi ◽  
Kevin J Mulhall
Keyword(s):  
Total Knee Arthroplasty ◽  
Knee Arthroplasty ◽  
Total Knee Arthroplasty Revision ◽  
Socioeconomic Issues ◽  
Total Knee ◽  
Arthroplasty Revision

Impact of Image-Derived Instrumentation on Total Knee Arthroplasty Revision Rates

2019 ◽  
Vol 101 (7) ◽  
pp. 580-588 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael J. McAuliffe ◽  
Benjamin R. Beer ◽  
Joshua J. Hatch ◽  
Ross W. Crawford ◽  
Alana R. Cuthbert ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Total Knee Arthroplasty ◽  
Knee Arthroplasty ◽  
Total Knee Arthroplasty Revision ◽  
Total Knee ◽  
Arthroplasty Revision

Radiographic Prediction of Intraoperative Bone Loss in Knee Arthroplasty Revision

2006 ◽  
Vol 446 ◽  
pp. 51-58 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kevin J Mulhall ◽  
Hassan M Ghomrawi ◽  
Gerard A Engh ◽  
Charles R Clark ◽  
Paul Lotke ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Bone Loss ◽  
Knee Arthroplasty ◽  
Arthroplasty Revision

scholarly journals Analysis of Total Knee Arthroplasty revision causes

2018 ◽  
Vol 19 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Anne Postler ◽  
Cornelia Lützner ◽  
Franziska Beyer ◽  
Eric Tille ◽  
Jörg Lützner
Keyword(s):  
Total Knee Arthroplasty ◽  
Knee Arthroplasty ◽  
Total Knee Arthroplasty Revision ◽  
Total Knee ◽  
Arthroplasty Revision

Comparative Biomechanical In Vitro Study of Different Modular Total Knee Arthroplasty Revision Stems With Bone Defects

2020 ◽  
Vol 35 (11) ◽  
pp. 3318-3325
Author(s):  
Dario Guttowski ◽  
Valerie Polster ◽  
Gerd Huber ◽  
Michael M. Morlock ◽  
Klaus Püschel ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Total Knee Arthroplasty ◽  
Knee Arthroplasty ◽  
In Vitro Study ◽  
Bone Defects ◽  
Vitro Study ◽  
Total Knee Arthroplasty Revision ◽  
Total Knee ◽  
Arthroplasty Revision

scholarly journals Comprehensive Look at Blood Transfusion Utilization in Total Joint Arthroplasty at a Single Academic Medical Center under a Single Surgeon

2013 ◽  
Vol 2013 ◽  
pp. 1-6 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sean Robinson ◽  
Owen McGonigle ◽  
Sam Volin ◽  
Yung-Chi Sung ◽  
Matthew Moore ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Total Knee Arthroplasty ◽  
Total Hip Arthroplasty ◽  
Knee Arthroplasty ◽  
Hip Arthroplasty ◽  
Medical Center ◽  
Academic Medical Center ◽  
Total Hip ◽  
Estimated Blood Loss ◽  
Total Knee ◽  
Arthroplasty Revision

The utilization of autologous and allogeneic transfusions in total joint arthroplasties was to characterize patients who may benefit from giving preoperative blood donations. We conducted a retrospective chart review of 525 patients to document preoperative hematocrit, estimated blood loss, length of stay, transfusions, and medical comorbidities. Results of our review showed that total hip arthroplasty revision (THA-R) had the highest prevalence of transfusions (60%) followed by total hip arthroplasty (THA, 53%), total knee arthroplasty-revision (TKA-R, 33%), and total knee arthroplasty (TKA, 23%). There was significant waste of autologous donations: 92% of TKA patients, 64% of THA, and 33% of THA-R patients wasted on average 1.527, 1.321, and 1.5 autologous units, respectively. Pre-operative hematocrit was the strongest predictor of future transfusion need across all procedures, and primary THA had additional predictors in age and gender.

scholarly journals KNEE ARTHROPLASTY REVISION WITH A CONSTRAINED IMPLANT USING HINGE AND ROTATING TIBIAL BASIS

2016 ◽  
Vol 24 (1) ◽  
pp. 22-26 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fabio Jansen Angelini ◽  
Camilo Partezani Helito ◽  
Bruno Azevedo Veronesi ◽  
Tales Mollica Guimarães ◽  
José Ricardo Pécora ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Knee Arthroplasty ◽  
Arthroplasty Revision

Functional outcome after total knee arthroplasty revision

2002 ◽  
Vol 17 (8) ◽  
pp. 967-977 ◽  
Author(s):  
Khaled J. Saleh ◽  
Daryll C. Dykes ◽  
Richard L. Tweedie ◽  
Khadeeja Mohamed ◽  
Ashwin Ravichandran ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Total Knee Arthroplasty ◽  
Functional Outcome ◽  
Knee Arthroplasty ◽  
Total Knee Arthroplasty Revision ◽  
Total Knee ◽  
Arthroplasty Revision

scholarly journals Revision total knee arthroplasty longer term outcome and comparison between infection and aseptic loosening at mean follow-up of 10 years

2020 ◽  
pp. 221049172097183
Author(s):  
TST Tse ◽  
SHK Hui ◽  
CY To ◽  
MK Wong ◽  
WL Tsang
Keyword(s):  
Total Knee Arthroplasty ◽  
Aseptic Loosening ◽  
Knee Arthroplasty ◽  
Revision Arthroplasty ◽  
Term Outcome ◽  
Revision Knee Arthroplasty ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Total Knee ◽  
Arthroplasty Revision

Background: Although the majority of total knee arthroplasty cases have good outcome and survival, some arthroplasty eventually required revision. While early outcomes of revision knee arthroplasty are well reported, there is relatively fewer literatures reporting on the longer term outcome of revision knee arthroplasty. This study aims to review the outcome of revision knee arthroplasty for a longer term, and also make comparison between the two common indications for revision arthroplasty of infection and aseptic loosening. Methods: This study reviews all total knee arthroplasty revision performed at a single center over a 11 year period. Of the 48 cases found, 35 cases not lost to follow-up had a mean follow-up duration of 10.6 years (SD 2.9) for aseptic loosening, and 10.1 years (SD 2.6) for infection. Data of initial arthroplasty, revision arthroplasty, demographics, follow-up outcome were obtained, analyzed and compared. Results: Revision arthroplasty due to infection had more cases that required use of varus/valgus constraints (p ∼ 0.008) and extensile surgical exposure of quadriceps snip (p ∼ 0.005) compared to aseptic loosening. The survival at 10 years for this study is 91% overall (aseptic loosening 93.3%, infection 89.3%). Infection cases had significant initial improvement for range of motion (p ∼ 0.001) and use of walking aid (p ∼ 0.04) at post-operation 1 year, but no significant differences between the infection and aseptic loosening cases at 5 years and 10 years follow-up. Comparison between the two groups on other factors including initial arthroplasty, operative details, demographics, post-operative details and X-rays showed no statistically significant difference.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document