Abstract No. 320: Proximal embolization of the splenic artery in splenic trauma

2010 ◽  
Vol 21 (2) ◽  
pp. S121
Author(s):  
I. Kori ◽  
O. Zmora ◽  
D. Samuels ◽  
A. Kessler ◽  
G. Rosen ◽  
...  
2021 ◽  
Vol 38 (01) ◽  
pp. 105-112
Author(s):  
Majd Habash ◽  
Darrel Ceballos ◽  
Andrew J. Gunn

AbstractThe spleen is the most commonly injured organ in blunt abdominal trauma. Patients who are hemodynamically unstable due to splenic trauma undergo definitive operative management. Interventional radiology plays an important role in the multidisciplinary management of the hemodynamically stable trauma patient with splenic injury. Hemodynamically stable patients selected for nonoperative management have improved clinical outcomes when splenic artery embolization is utilized. The purpose of this article is to review the indications, technical aspects, and clinical outcomes of splenic artery embolization for patients with high-grade splenic injuries.


2015 ◽  
Vol 38 (5) ◽  
pp. 1143-1151 ◽  
Author(s):  
P. T. Foley ◽  
H. Kavnoudias ◽  
P. U. Cameron ◽  
C. Czarnecki ◽  
E. Paul ◽  
...  

2008 ◽  
Vol 35 (2) ◽  
pp. 108-114 ◽  
Author(s):  
Osnat Zmora ◽  
Yitzhak Kori ◽  
David Samuels ◽  
Ada Kessler ◽  
Carl I. Schulman ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 11 (4) ◽  
pp. 293
Author(s):  
Vicki Moran ◽  
Carl Freeman ◽  
Adam Fang ◽  
Heidi Isreal ◽  
Shuran Ma ◽  
...  

2016 ◽  
Vol 20 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Richard J. Cormack ◽  
Mollie C.M. Ferris ◽  
Jason K. Wong ◽  
Stefan Przybojewski

Background: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the splenic salvage rate with angioembolisation in the non-operative management (NOM) of blunt splenic injury.Methods: We conducted a retrospective analysis of patients presenting to our Level I trauma centre with computed tomography (CT)-confirmed splenic injury following blunt trauma and in whom angioembolisation was utilised in the algorithm of NOM. Data review included CT and angiography findings, embolisation technique and patient outcomes.Results: Between January 2005 and April 2010, 60 patients with splenic injury following blunt trauma underwent NOM, which included splenic artery embolisation (SAE). All patients included in the study required a preadmission. CT scan was used to document the American Association for the Surgery of Trauma (AAST) grade of splenic injury. The average injury grade was 3.0. The non-operative splenic salvage rate following SAE was 96.7% with statistically similar salvage rates achieved for grades II to IV injuries. The quantity of haemoperitoneum and the presence of a splenic vascular injury did not significantly affect the splenic salvage rate. The overall complication rate was 27%, of which 15% were minor and 13% were major.Conclusion: SAE is a safe and effective treatment strategy in the NOM of blunt splenic injury. The quantity of haemoperitoneum, the presence of vascular injury and embolisation technique did not significantly affect the splenic salvage rate.


2014 ◽  
Vol 3 (2) ◽  
pp. 37-48
Author(s):  
CP Chou ◽  
YH Kim ◽  
S Tresoldi ◽  
EI Tikh ◽  
S Baker ◽  
...  

Objective: To evaluate the efficacy of superselective splenic artery embolization (SAE) using a coaxial catheter technique in patients with blunt splenic injury. Patient Selection and Methods: We retrospectively reviewed cases of 24 consecutive patients undergoing splenic angiography for blunt splenic injury at a Level 1 trauma center. After angiographic confirmation of splenic injury, superselective SAE was performed using gelfoam pledgets (n=15), with or without coils, and liquid embolic materials (n=9). All procedures were performed through a microcatheter advanced coaxially through a selective angiographic catheter. Severity of splenic injury was graded using CT imaging. The angiographic findings were retrospectively divided into four groups. Outcome measures included technical success, complications and recurrence of symptoms requiring additional intervention or surgery despite embolization. Results: All cases were technically successful, with immediate occlusion of targeted vessels after embolization. One patient underwent distal pancreatectomy- splenectomy 3 days after splenic embolization due to symptoms related to distal pancreatic injury, unrelated to the angiographic intervention. A second embolization was performed 1-3 days after initial embolization in 4 patients with clinical suspicion of re-bleeding. One of these four patients underwent splenectomy 3 days after the second embolization, during exploration for associated bowel and diaphragmatic injury. A second patient underwent splenectomy 1 day after a second embolization due to need for continued transfusions. The splenic salvage rate was not significantly related to CT grade of splenic injury (p=1.0) or angiographic classification (p=0.8). Conclusion: Superselective SAE can be performed as a safe alternative to splenectomy in patients with blunt splenic trauma, particularly when there is no additional major organ injury. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3126/njr.v3i2.9606 Nepalese Journal of Radiology Vol.3(2)July-Dec, 2013: 37-48


1995 ◽  
Vol 5 (05) ◽  
pp. 310-312 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. Uroz Tristan ◽  
D. Poenaru ◽  
F. Martinez Lagares ◽  
S. Leclerc ◽  
L. Sanchis Solera

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document