Abstract No. 454: Efficacy and safety of radiofrequency wire recanalization of central venous occlusions

2012 ◽  
Vol 23 (3) ◽  
pp. S179
Author(s):  
G. Sivananthan ◽  
K.P. Daly ◽  
N. Halin
2013 ◽  
Vol 2013 ◽  
pp. 1-8 ◽  
Author(s):  
Serdar Topaloglu ◽  
Kıymet Yesilcicek Calik ◽  
Adnan Calik ◽  
Coskun Aydın ◽  
Sema Kocyigit ◽  
...  

Background. This retrospective study was designed to investigate the efficacy and safety of intermittent portal triad clamping (PTC) with low central venous pressure (CVP) in liver resections.Methods. Between January 2007 and August 2013, 115 patients underwent liver resection with intermittent PTC. The patients’ data were retrospectively analyzed.Results. There were 58 males and 57 females with a mean age of 55 years (±13.7). Cirrhosis was found in 23 patients. Resections were performed for malignant disease in 62.6% (n=72) and for benign disease in 37.4% (n=43). Major hepatectomy was performed in 26 patients (22.4%). Mean liver ischemia period was 27.1 min (±13.9). The mortality rate was 1.7% and the morbidity rate was 22.6%. Cumulative clamping time (t=3.61,P<0.001) and operation time (t=2.38,P<0.019) were significantly correlated with AST alterations (D-AST). Cumulative clamping time (t=5.16,P<0.001) was significantly correlated with D-ALT. Operation time (t=5.81,P<0.001) was significantly correlated with D-LDH.Conclusions. Intermittent PTC under low CVP was performed with low morbidity and mortality. Intermittent PTC can be safely applied up to 60 minutes in both normal and impaired livers.


2015 ◽  
Vol 16 (4) ◽  
pp. 309-314 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gajan Sivananthan ◽  
Daniel H. MacArthur ◽  
Kevin P. Daly ◽  
David W. Allen ◽  
Salar Hakham ◽  
...  

Blood ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 138 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 2139-2139
Author(s):  
Allen Li ◽  
Willem Brandt ◽  
Cameron Brown ◽  
Tzu-Fei Wang ◽  
Rick Ikesaka ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is a leading cause of mortality in patients with cancer and is associated with significant morbidity and healthcare expenditure. The risk of VTE is also increased following the insertion of a central venous catheter (CVC) for chemotherapy deliverance and supportive care. The risks and benefits of primary thromboprophylaxis in patients with cancer and newly inserted CVC are unclear. Objective We sought to assess the rates of VTE and major bleeding complications to determine the safety and efficacy of primary thromboprophylaxis in adult patients with cancer and a CVC. Methods A systematic search of MEDLINE, EMBASE, and all EBM was conducted. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of adult patients with cancer and a CVC receiving primary thromboprophylaxis or observation/placebo were included. The primary efficacy and safety outcomes were total VTE and major bleeding episodes, respectively. Results A total of 9 RCTs (3155 patients) were included in the analysis. The total rates of VTE were significantly lower in patients receiving primary thromboprophylaxis compared to those not receiving primary prevention (7.6% vs. 13%; Odds Ratio (OR) 0.51, 95% CI 0.32 to 0.82, p &lt; 0.01, I² = 52%) (Figure 1). The rate of major bleeding complication was not increased in patients receiving thromboprophylaxis (0.9% vs. 0.7%; OR 1.12, 95% CI 0.29 to 4.40, p = 0.87, I² = 32%) (Figure 2). Conclusions Primary thromboprophylaxis significantly reduced the risk of VTE without increasing the risk of major bleeding complications in patients with cancer and CVC. Future studies are needed to confirm these findings. Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures Wang: Servier: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Leo Pharma: Research Funding. Ikesaka: LEO Pharma: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Sanofi: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Wells: Bristol-Myers Squibb: Honoraria; Pfizer: Honoraria; Bayer: Honoraria; BMS/Pfizer: Research Funding; Servier: Honoraria. Carrier: Servier: Honoraria; Boehringer Ingelheim: Honoraria; Pfizer: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Aspen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Bristol Myers Squibb: Honoraria; Bayer: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; LEO Pharma: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Sanofi Aventis: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document