scholarly journals Transjugular Balloon-Assisted Retrograde Ethylene-Vinyl Alcohol Copolymer Embolization of a Main Pulmonary Artery Defect Discovered during Removal of a Malpositioned Dialytic Central Venous Catheter

2019 ◽  
Vol 30 (5) ◽  
pp. 742-743
Author(s):  
Pietro Quaretti ◽  
Nicola Cionfoli ◽  
Lorenzo Paolo Moramarco ◽  
Riccardo Corti ◽  
Giorgio Togni
2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael C Chang ◽  
Mary Garland

Optimal support of critically ill surgical patients with cardiovascular dysfunction requires that the bedside clinician have both a clear understanding of basic cardiovascular physiology and thorough knowledge of the information available from invasive hemodynamic monitors, including the advantages and pitfalls of each system. Assessment of hemodynamic function in underperfused patients should start with a quantitative assessment of global cardiovascular function. Global variables can be flow derived (e.g., cardiac output), pressure derived (e.g., systolic blood pressure), or both (e.g., ventricular stroke work and power). Any assessment consistent with inadequate global hemodynamic performance should be followed by analysis of the independent determinants of cardiovascular function. These independent determinants include heart rate, preload, afterload, and myocardial contractility. Invasive hemodynamic monitors allow the bedside clinician to measure and quantitate various combinations of global performance and the determinants of cardiac function depending on the monitoring system employed. Central venous lines enable measurement of central venous pressure but limited measure of right ventricular preload. Pulmonary artery catheters offer information pertaining to several global measures and independent determinants. Devices that depend on pulse contour wave analysis, when coupled with a central venous catheter, can measure cardiac output and preload in the context of measurements of stroke volume. However, being invasive, each device carries some degree of risk to the patient, and each monitoring technique employed via these devices carries pitfalls in both measurement and interpretation. It is incumbent upon the bedside clinician to understand the physiologic derangements affecting the patient and the utility and pitfalls of the information available from each device when selecting monitoring systems to be used in any given patient and the supportive therapy that ensues. This review contains 3 figures, 1 table, and 28 references. Key words: afterload, cardiac output, central venous catheter, hemodynamic monitor, myocardial contractility, perfusion, preload, pulmonary artery catheter, pulse contour analysis, stroke volume, stroke volume variability, stroke work, ventricular power 


2003 ◽  
Vol 31 (1) ◽  
pp. 80-86 ◽  
Author(s):  
C. S. Webster ◽  
A. F. Merry ◽  
D. J. Emmens ◽  
I. C. Van Cotthem ◽  
R. L. Holland ◽  
...  

We conducted a prospective audit of central venous catheter (CVC) use in 1000 consecutive patients to better define the rates of postoperative complications (particularly vascular perforation) and the pattern of CVC and pulmonary artery catheter (PAC) usage (particularly the number of lumens inserted and utilized). Details of CVCs, complications, and the number of lumens in place and used, were recorded daily until all CVCs were removed. A total of 1546 CVCs and 223 PACs were placed in study patients. Two non-fatal perforations occurred: a perforated right atrium in a patient who received an Arrow triple-lumen CVC (previously reported), and a perforated pulmonary artery in a patient upon withdrawal of a Baxter PAC. The risk per patient of any CVC-related perforation was 0.2% (95% confidence interval (CI): 0.02% to 0.7%). The rates of CVC-related sepsis and local infection were 3% (95% CI: 2% to 4%) and 2% (95% CI: 1% to 3%) respectively. At the peak of CVC use (day 1 in the ICU) the overall number of lumens placed was significantly correlated with lumens used (r=0.53), endorsing clinical judgement in the anticipation of the needs of the patient. The modal number of lumen uses in adults and children was four. However, in children, fewer catheters were inserted per patient than in adults (1.28 vs 1.63, P=0.01), and placed lumens were used more intensively (P< 0.001). Data appear to justify the routine selection of a triple-lumen CVC in adult patients, but not of a quad-lumen CVC.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document