stroke volume
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

2509
(FIVE YEARS 462)

H-INDEX

88
(FIVE YEARS 6)

2022 ◽  
Vol 15 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Jon-Émile S. Kenny ◽  
Igor Barjaktarevic ◽  
David C. Mackenzie ◽  
Mai Elfarnawany ◽  
Zhen Yang ◽  
...  

Abstract Objective Doppler ultrasonography of the common carotid artery is used to infer stroke volume change and a wearable Doppler ultrasound has been designed to improve this workflow. Previously, in a human model of hemorrhage and resuscitation comprising approximately 50,000 cardiac cycles, we found a strong, linear correlation between changing stroke volume, and measures from the carotid Doppler signal, however, optimal Doppler thresholds for detecting a 10% stroke volume change were not reported. In this Research Note, we present these thresholds, their sensitivities, specificities and areas under their receiver operator curves (AUROC). Results Augmentation of carotid artery maximum velocity time integral and corrected flowtime by 18% and 4%, respectively, accurately captured 10% stroke volume rise. The sensitivity and specificity for these thresholds were identical at 89% and 100%. These data are similar to previous investigations in healthy volunteers monitored by the wearable ultrasound.


2022 ◽  
Author(s):  
Cornelis Slagt ◽  
Eduard Johannes Spoelder ◽  
Marijn Cornelia Theresia Tacken ◽  
Maartje Frijlink ◽  
Sjoerd Servaas ◽  
...  

Abstract Background: During the COVID-19 pandemic in The Netherlands, critically ill ventilated COVID-19 patients were transferred not only between hospitals by ambulance but also by the Helicopter Emergency Medical Service (HEMS). To date, little is known about the impact of helicopter transport on critically ill patients and COVID-19 patients in particular. This study was conducted to explore the impact of inter-hospital helicopter transfer on vital signs of mechanically ventilated severe COVID-19 intensive care patients, with special focus on take-off, midflight, and landing.Methods: All ventilated critically ill COVID-19 patients who were transported between April 2020 and June 2021 by the Dutch ‘Lifeliner 5’ HEMS team and who were fully monitored, including noninvasive cardiac output, were included in this study. Three 10-minute timeframes (take-off, midflight and landing) were defined for analysis. Continuous data on the vital parameters heart rate, peripheral oxygen saturation, arterial blood pressure, end-tidal CO2 and noninvasive cardiac output using electrical cardiometry were collected and stored at 1-minute intervals. Data were analydzed for differences over time within the timeframes using 1-way analysis of variance. Significant differences were checked for clinical relevance.Results: Ninety-eight patients were included in the analysis. During take-off, an increase was noticed in cardiac output (from 6.7 to 8.1 Lmin-1; P<0.0001), which was determined by a decrease in systemic vascular resistance (from 1068 to 750 dyne·s·cm−5, P<0.0001) accompanied by an increase in stroke volume (from 92.0 to 110.2 ml, P<0.0001). Other parameters were unchanged during take-off and mid-flight. During landing, cardiac output and stroke volume slightly decreased (from 7.9 to 7.1 Lmin-1, P<0.0001 and from 108.3 to 100.6 ml, P<0.0001, respectively), and total systemic vascular resistance increased (P<0.0001). Though statistically significant, the found changes were small and not clinically relevant to the medical status of the patients as judged by the attending physicians.Conclusions: Interhospital helicopter transfer of ventilated intensive care patients with COVID-19 can be performed safely and does not result in clinically relevant changes in vital signs.This study was assessed by the medical ethical committee Arnhem-Nijmegen, the Netherlands (identifier 2021-7313). The committee waived the need for informed consent. The study was registered at www.trialregister.nl (identifier NL9307).


2022 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chiara Sonnino ◽  
Luciano Frassanito ◽  
Alessandra Piersanti ◽  
Pietro Paolo Giuri ◽  
Bruno Antonio Zanfini ◽  
...  

Abstract Background: Left uterine displacement (LUD) has been questioned as an effective strategy to prevent aortocaval compression after spinal anesthesia (SA) for cesarean delivery (CD). We tested if LUD has a significant impact on cardiac output (CO) in patients undergoing CD under SA during continuous non-invasive hemodynamic monitoring.Methods: Forty-six patients were included in the final analysis. We considered 4 timepoints of 5 minutes each: T1=baseline with LUD; T2=baseline without LUD; T3=after SA with LUD; T4=after SA without LUD. LUD was then repositioned for CD. Primary outcome was to test if CO decreased from T3 to T4. We also compared CO between T1 and T2 and other hemodynamic variables: mean, systolic and diastolic blood pressure (respectively MAP, SAP and DAP), heart rate (HR), stroke volume (SV), stroke volume variation (SVV), pulse pressure variation (PPV), contractility (dP/dt), dynamic arterial elastance (Eadyn) at the different timepoints. Data on fetal Apgar scores and umbilical arterial and venous pH were collected.Results: CO did not vary from T3 to T4 [CO mean difference -0.02 L/min [95% CI -0.88 to 0.82; p=1]. No significant variation was registered for any variable at any timepoint. Conclusions: LUD did not show a significant impact on CO during continuous hemodynamic monitoring after SA for CD.Trial registration: (retrospectively registered on 03/12/2021) NCT05143684.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Cornelis Slagt ◽  
Eduard Johannes Spoelder ◽  
Marijn Cornelia Theresia Tacken ◽  
Maartje Frijlink ◽  
Sjoerd Servaas ◽  
...  

Abstract Background: During the COVID-19 pandemic in The Netherlands, critically ill ventilated COVID-19 patients were not only transferred between hospitals by ambulance, but also by the Helicopter Emergency Medical Service (HEMS). To date, little is known about the impact of helicopter transport on critically ill patients, and COVID-19 patients in particular. This study was conducted to explore the impact of inter-hospital helicopter transfer on vital signs of mechanically ventilated severe COVID-19 intensive care patients, with special focus on take-off, midflight, and landing. Methods: All ventilated critically ill COVID-19 patients who were transported between April 2020 and June 2021 by the Dutch ‘Lifeliner 5’ HEMS team and who were fully monitored including non-invasive cardiac output, were included in this study. Three 10 minute timeframes (take-off, midflight and landing) were defined for analysis. Continuous data of vital parameters heartrate, peripheral oxygen saturation, arterial blood pressure, end-tidal CO2 and non-invasive cardiac output using electrical cardiometry were collected and stored at a 1 minute interval. Data were analysed for differences over time within the timeframes using 1-way analysis of variance. Significant differences were checked for clinical relevance. Results: Ninety-eight patients were included in the analysis. During take-off an increase was noticed in cardiac output (from 6.7 to 8.1 Lmin-1; P<0.0001) which was determined by a decrease in systemic vascular resistance (from 1068 to 750 dyne·s·cm−5, P<0.0001) accompanied by an increase in stroke volume (from 92.0 to 110.2 ml, P<0.0001). Other parameters were unchanged during take-off and mid-flight. During the landing cardiac output and stroke volume slightly decreased (from 7.9 to 7.1 Lmin-1, P<0.0001 and from 108.3 to 100.6 ml, P<0.0001 respectively) and total systemic vascular resistance increased (P<0.0001). Though statistically significant, the found changes were small and not clinically relevant to the medical status of the patients as judged by the attending physicians. Conclusions: Interhospital helicopter transfer of ventilated intensive care patients with COVID-19 can be performed safely and does not result in clinically relevant changes in vital signs. This study this has been assessed by the medical ethical committee Arnhem-Nijmegen, the Netherlands (identifier 2021-7313). The committee waived the need for informed consent. The study was registered at www.trialregister.nl (identifier NL9307).


Author(s):  
Ryan M. Reavette ◽  
Spencer J. Sherwin ◽  
Meng-Xing Tang ◽  
Peter D. Weinberg

Heart failure is treatable, but in the United Kingdom, the 1-, 5- and 10-year mortality rates are 24.1, 54.5 and 75.5%, respectively. The poor prognosis reflects, in part, the lack of specific, simple and affordable diagnostic techniques; the disease is often advanced by the time a diagnosis is made. Previous studies have demonstrated that certain metrics derived from pressure–velocity-based wave intensity analysis are significantly altered in the presence of impaired heart performance when averaged over groups, but to date, no study has examined the diagnostic potential of wave intensity on an individual basis, and, additionally, the pressure waveform can only be obtained accurately using invasive methods, which has inhibited clinical adoption. Here, we investigate whether a new form of wave intensity based on noninvasive measurements of arterial diameter and velocity can detect impaired heart performance in an individual. To do so, we have generated a virtual population of two-thousand elderly subjects, modelling half as healthy controls and half with an impaired stroke volume. All metrics derived from the diameter–velocity-based wave intensity waveforms in the carotid, brachial and radial arteries showed significant crossover between groups—no one metric in any artery could reliably indicate whether a subject’s stroke volume was normal or impaired. However, after applying machine learning to the metrics, we found that a support vector classifier could simultaneously achieve up to 99% recall and 95% precision. We conclude that noninvasive wave intensity analysis has significant potential to improve heart failure screening and diagnosis.


PLoS ONE ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 16 (12) ◽  
pp. e0261546
Author(s):  
Sam D. Hutchings ◽  
Jim Watchorn ◽  
Rory McDonald ◽  
Su Jeffreys ◽  
Mark Bates ◽  
...  

Introduction Haemorrhage is a leading cause of death following traumatic injury and the early detection of hypovolaemia is critical to effective management. However, accurate assessment of circulating blood volume is challenging when using traditional vital signs such as blood pressure. We conducted a study to compare the stroke volume (SV) recorded using two devices, trans-thoracic electrical bioimpedance (TEB) and supra-sternal Doppler (SSD), against a reference standard using trans- thoracic echocardiography (TTE). Methods A lower body negative pressure (LBNP) model was used to simulate hypovolaemia and in half of the study sessions lower limb tourniquets were applied as these are common in military practice and can potentially affect some haemodynamic monitoring systems. In order to provide a clinically relevant comparison we constructed an error grid alongside more traditional measures of agreement. Results 21 healthy volunteers aged 18–40 were enrolled and underwent 2 sessions of LBNP, with and without lower limb tourniquets. With respect to absolute SV values Bland Altman analysis showed significant bias in both non-tourniquet and tourniquet strands for TEB (-42.5 / -49.6 ml), rendering further analysis impossible. For SSD bias was minimal but percentage error was unacceptably high (35% / 48%). Degree of agreement for dynamic change in SV, assessed using 4 quadrant plots showed a seemingly acceptable concordance rate for both TEB (86% / 93%) and SSD (90% / 91%). However, when results were plotted on an error grid, constructed based on expert clinical opinion, a significant minority of measurement errors were identified that had potential to lead to moderate or severe patient harm. Conclusion Thoracic bioimpedance and suprasternal Doppler both demonstrated measurement errors that had the potential to lead to clinical harm and caution should be applied in interpreting the results in the detection of early hypovolaemia following traumatic injury.


2021 ◽  
Vol 12 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lilian Vornholz ◽  
Fabian Nienhaus ◽  
Michael Gliem ◽  
Christina Alter ◽  
Carina Henning ◽  
...  

Patients with acute ischemic stroke (AIS) present an increased incidence of systemic inflammatory response syndrome and release of Troponin T coinciding with cardiac dysfunction. The nature of the cardiocirculatory alterations remains obscure as models to investigate systemic interferences of the brain-heart-axis following AIS are sparse. Thus, this study aims to investigate acute cardiocirculatory dysfunction and myocardial injury in mice after reperfused AIS. Ischemic stroke was induced in mice by transient right-sided middle cerebral artery occlusion (tMCAO). Cardiac effects were investigated by electrocardiograms, 3D-echocardiography, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), invasive conductance catheter measurements, histology, flow-cytometry, and determination of high-sensitive Troponin T (hsTnT). Systemic hemodynamics were recorded and catecholamines and inflammatory markers in circulating blood and myocardial tissue were determined by immuno-assay and flow-cytometry. Twenty-four hours following tMCAO hsTnT was elevated 4-fold compared to controls and predicted long-term survival. In parallel, systolic left ventricular dysfunction occurred with impaired global longitudinal strain, lower blood pressure, reduced stroke volume, and severe bradycardia leading to reduced cardiac output. This was accompanied by a systemic inflammatory response characterized by granulocytosis, lymphopenia, and increased levels of serum-amyloid P and interleukin-6. Within myocardial tissue, MRI relaxometry indicated expansion of extracellular space, most likely due to inflammatory edema and a reduced fluid volume. Accordingly, we found an increased abundance of granulocytes, apoptotic cells, and upregulation of pro-inflammatory cytokines within myocardial tissue following tMCAO. Therefore, reperfused ischemic stroke leads to specific cardiocirculatory alterations that are characterized by acute heart failure with reduced stroke volume, bradycardia, and changes in cardiac tissue and accompanied by systemic and local inflammatory responses.


2021 ◽  
Vol 50 (1) ◽  
pp. 177-177
Author(s):  
Muhammad Javed ◽  
Douglas Hansell ◽  
Jennifer Sahatjian ◽  
Heath Latham

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document