scholarly journals Middle mesenteric artery arising from an inflammatory infrarenal aortic aneurysm

2009 ◽  
Vol 49 (2) ◽  
pp. 474-477 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrea M. Dirrigl ◽  
Alexander Zimmermann ◽  
Stefan Ockert ◽  
Hans-Henning Eckstein
VASA ◽  
2007 ◽  
Vol 36 (1) ◽  
pp. 41-43 ◽  
Author(s):  
Vandoni ◽  
Alerci ◽  
Froment ◽  
Braghetti ◽  
Bogen ◽  
...  

Middle mesenteric artery has been described in 1923. We report the observation of a patient with an abdominal aortic aneurysm who had this rare artery arising from the anterior wall of the aneurysmal sac. His inferior mesenteric artery was occluded at its origin from the aorta and the middle and the distal colon was vascularized only by the middle mesenteric artery. Occlusion of this artery would have been necessary before endovascular repair of the aneurysm. We were concerned about the risk of colic ischemia after the occlusion of the middle mesenteric artery, so we abandoned this approach and operated on the patient via a laparotomy. Based on a case report, we here report a literature overview on the repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm in the presence of a middle mesenteric artery.


VASA ◽  
1999 ◽  
Vol 28 (1) ◽  
pp. 30-33 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bürger ◽  
Meyer ◽  
Tautenhahn ◽  
Halloul

Background: Objective evaluation of the management of patients with ruptured infrarenal aortic aneurysm in emergency situations has been described rarely. Patients and methods: Fifty-two consecutive patients with ruptured infrarenal aortic aneurysm (mean age, 70.3 years; range, 56–89 years; SD 7.8) were admitted between January 1993 and March 1998. Emergency protocols, final reports, and follow-up data were analyzed retrospectively. APACHE II scores at admission and fifth postoperative day were assessed. Results: The time between the appearance of first symptoms and the referral of patients to the hospital was more than 5 hours in 37 patients (71%). Thirty-eight patients (71%) had signs of shock at time of admission. Ultrasound was performed in 81% of patients as the first diagnostic procedure. The most frequent site of aortic rupture was the left retroperitoneum (87%). Intraoperatively, acute left ventricular failure occurred in four patients, and cardiac arrest in two others. The postoperative course was complicated significantly in 34 patients. The overall mortality rate was 36.5% (n = 19). In 35 patients, APACHE II score was assessed, showing a probability of death of more than 40% in five patients and lower than 30% in 17 others. No patient showing probability of death of above 75% at the fifth postoperative day survived (n = 7). Conclusions: Ruptured aortic aneurysm demands surgical intervention. Clinical outcome is also influenced by preclinical and anesthetic management. The severity of disease as well as the patient’s prognosis can be approximated using APACHE II score. Treatment results of heterogenous patient groups can be compared.


2007 ◽  
Vol 14 (2) ◽  
pp. 144-149 ◽  
Author(s):  
Volker Ruppert ◽  
Kerstin Erz ◽  
Dominik Bürklein ◽  
Marcus Treitl ◽  
Bernd Steckmeier ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 78 ◽  
pp. 35-37
Author(s):  
Christopher C. Zarour ◽  
Kaitlin M. Zaki-Metias ◽  
Arooj Mian ◽  
Michael Vempala ◽  
Barakat Ogunde ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document