scholarly journals Duplex Ultrasound Surveillance After Transcarotid Artery Revascularization (TCAR) in Clinical Practice

2021 ◽  
Vol 73 (5) ◽  
pp. 1830
Author(s):  
B.R. Beeman ◽  
B.A. Kuhn ◽  
M.H. Recht ◽  
P.E. Muck ◽  
P.A. Schneider
2019 ◽  
Vol 70 (5) ◽  
pp. e162
Author(s):  
Brian R. Beeman ◽  
Brian A. Kuhn ◽  
Matthew Recht ◽  
Patrick Muck ◽  
Peter A. Schneider

Author(s):  
Brian R. Beeman ◽  
Brian A. Kuhn ◽  
Matthew H. Recht ◽  
Patrick E. Muck ◽  
Peter A. Schneider

2011 ◽  
pp. 601-612
Author(s):  
Joe P. Chauvapun ◽  
Martin R. Back ◽  
Dennis F. Bandyk

2020 ◽  
Vol 144 ◽  
pp. e80-e86
Author(s):  
Peter A. Rozman ◽  
David B. Kurland ◽  
Danielle Golub ◽  
Myra Trang ◽  
Aaron Rothstein ◽  
...  

2007 ◽  
Vol 31 (1) ◽  
pp. 27-30
Author(s):  
Patrick A. Stone ◽  
Paul A. Armstrong ◽  
Sarah K. Flaherty ◽  
Robert Brumberg ◽  
Martin R. Back ◽  
...  

2015 ◽  
Vol 62 (2) ◽  
pp. 378-384 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ali F. AbuRahma ◽  
Mohit Srivastava ◽  
Zachary AbuRahma ◽  
Will Jackson ◽  
Albeir Mousa ◽  
...  

2006 ◽  
Vol 192 (5) ◽  
pp. 583-588 ◽  
Author(s):  
Brian Park ◽  
Francesco Aiello ◽  
Michael Dahn ◽  
James O. Menzoian ◽  
Arun Mavanur

2019 ◽  
Vol 21 (5) ◽  
pp. 623-629
Author(s):  
Andrew TO Nickinson ◽  
Rebecca Rogers ◽  
Ahmed Elbasty ◽  
Ian Nunney ◽  
Philip C Bennett

Background: Duplex ultrasound surveillance with pre-emptive treatment of an identified stenosis is increasingly being utilised to help maintain arteriovenous fistula patency. This study aims to determine whether post-operative duplex ultrasound surveillance can improve fistula patency at 12 months and improve the proportion of ‘pre-haemodialysis’ patients commencing haemodialysis via a usable fistula. Methods: All arteriovenous fistulae formed between 1st January 2015 and 31st August 2017 in a single, tertiary vascular centre were included. Primary and secondary patency at 12 months, along with the proportion of pre-haemodialysis patients commencing haemodialysis via a usable arteriovenous fistula, were compared between the fistulae undergoing duplex ultrasound surveillance and ‘standard practice’. Results: Two hundred forty-one arteriovenous fistulae were created in 216 patients. A higher proportion of brachiobasilic transposition arteriovenous fistula and patients undergoing arteriovenous fistula creation following a previously failed access were identified in the duplex ultrasound surveillance group. Primary patency at 12 months (hazard ratio = 0.43, 95% confidence interval = 0.30–0.61, p < .001) was significantly lower in the duplex ultrasound surveillance group compared with the ‘standard practice’ group. Despite this, no difference was identified in secondary patency at 12 months (hazard ratio = 1.82, 95% confidence interval = 0.87–3.80, p = .112). No difference was also identified in the proportion of pre-haemodialysis patients starting haemodialysis with a usable arteriovenous fistula (duplex ultrasound surveillance = 65.0% vs standard practice = 77.8%; odds ratio = 0.53, 95% confidence interval 0.58–1.19, p = .279). Conclusion: Post-operative duplex ultrasound surveillance following arteriovenous fistula formation is associated with higher rates of post-operative intervention; however, this does not translate into improved secondary patency or the proportion of pre-haemodialysis patients commencing HD via their fistula.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document