ObjectivesTo explore whether a conceptual model of patient satisfaction previously developed 1–2 years post-total knee replacement (TKR) is still relevant 3–4 years post-TKR. Specifically, (i) what is the stability in satisfaction levels 3–4 years post-TKR? and (ii) does the existing conceptual model of patient satisfaction after TKR apply at this later follow-up?DesignA constructivist grounded theory qualitative follow-up study. The present study was theoretically governed by the findings of the initial qualitative inquiry. One-on-one semi-structured interviews were used to test the assumptions of the model developed from the findings of the previous study.SettingAn urban Australian public hospitalParticipantsFrom 40 people who participated in the original study, 11 participants were purposively sampled based on their level of satisfaction and factors driving satisfaction as reported in their first interview. There were six women and five men, the average time since TKR was 3 years and 5 months, and the average age at time of interview was 77 years.ResultsSatisfaction levels were mostly stable with the exception of three participants; two transitioned in a positive direction; one in a negative direction. The meaning of satisfaction and the factors that influenced satisfaction were consistent with the original findings. However, beliefs relating to the influence of ageing on persistent knee symptoms and functional limitations were more dominant in the present study.ConclusionsThe findings provide support for patient satisfaction being a multifactorial construct that is potentially modifiable over time. Clinicians may apply the conceptual model we have described to optimise satisfaction in patients up to 3–4 years post-TKR.
Radiographic follow-up study of cementless total knee Replacement (Mark-II, Okayama University Type)
