Delaying ACL reconstruction beyond 6 months from injury impacts likelihood for clinically significant outcome improvement

The Knee ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 33 ◽  
pp. 290-297
Author(s):  
Brian Forsythe ◽  
Yining Lu ◽  
Avinesh Agarwalla ◽  
Chimere O. Ezuma ◽  
Bhavik H. Patel ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Acl Reconstruction ◽  
Outcome Improvement ◽  
Clinically Significant

Timeline for Maximal Subjective Outcome Improvement After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction

2018 ◽  
Vol 47 (10) ◽  
pp. 2501-2509 ◽  
Author(s):  
Avinesh Agarwalla ◽  
Richard N. Puzzitiello ◽  
Joseph N. Liu ◽  
Gregory L. Cvetanovich ◽  
Anirudh K. Gowd ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Anterior Cruciate Ligament ◽  
Acl Reconstruction ◽  
Clinical Significance ◽  
Cruciate Ligament ◽  
Return To Sport ◽  
Pubmed Database ◽  
Patient Reported ◽  
Clinically Significant ◽  
Anterior Cruciate

Background: Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) tears are one of the most common traumatic knee injuries experienced by athletes. Return to sport is considered the pinnacle endpoint among patients receiving ACL reconstruction. However, at the time of return to sport, patients may not be participating at their previous levels of function, as defined by clinical metrics. Purpose: To establish when patients perceive maximal subjective medical improvement according to patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs). Study Design: Systematic review. Methods: A systematic review of the PubMed database was conducted to identify studies that reported sequential PROMs up to a minimum of 2 years after ACL reconstruction. Pooled analysis was conducted for PROMs at follow-up points of 3 months, 6 months, 1 year, and 2 years. Clinically significant improvement was determined between pairs of intervals with the minimal clinically important difference. Results: This review contains 30 studies including 2253 patients who underwent ACL reconstruction. Clinically significant improvement in the KOOS (Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score) was seen up to 1 year after ACL reconstruction, but no clinical significance was noted from 1 to 2 years. Clinically significant improvement in the IKDC (International Knee Documentation Committee) and Lysholm questionnaires was seen up to 6 months postoperatively, but no clinical significance was noted beyond that. Conclusion: After ACL reconstruction, maximal subjective medical improvement is established 1 year postoperatively, with no further perceived clinical improvement beyond this time point according to current PROMs. The KOOS may be a more responsive metric to subjective improvements in this patient cohort than other patient-reported outcomes, such as the IKDC and Lysholm. Clinical Relevance: After ACL reconstruction, patients perceive interval subjective improvements until 1 year postoperatively.

scholarly journals Clinically Significant Outcome Improvement After Hip Arthroscopy in Patients With Femoroacetabular Impingement Syndrome and Severe Femoral Torsion

2021 ◽  
Vol 9 (10) ◽  
pp. 232596712110345
Author(s):  
Steven F. DeFroda ◽  
Thomas D. Alter ◽  
Blake M. Bodendorfer ◽  
Alexander C. Newhouse ◽  
Felipe S. Bessa ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Femoroacetabular Impingement ◽  
Hip Arthroscopy ◽  
Impingement Syndrome ◽  
Harris Hip Score ◽  
Femoral Torsion ◽  
Outcome Score ◽  
Femoroacetabular Impingement Syndrome ◽  
Patient Reported ◽  
Outcome Improvement ◽  
Clinically Significant

Background: The influence of femoral torsion on clinically significant outcome improvement after hip arthroscopy for femoroacetabular impingement syndrome (FAIS) has not been well-studied. Purpose: To quantify femoral torsion in FAIS patients using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and explore the relationship between femoral torsion and clinically significant outcome improvement after hip arthroscopy. Study Design: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3. Methods: Included were patients who underwent hip arthroscopy for FAIS between January 2012 and August 2018 and had 2-year follow-up and preoperative MRI scans containing transcondylar slices of the knee. Participants were categorized as having severe retrotorsion (SR; <0°), normal torsion (NT; 0°-25°), and severe antetorsion (SA; >25°) as measured on MRI. Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) included the Hip Outcome Score–Activities of Daily Living, Hip Outcome Score–Sports Subscale, modified Harris Hip Score, 12-item International Hip Outcome Tool (iHOT-12), and visual analog scale (VAS) for pain and satisfaction. Achievement of Patient Acceptable Symptom State (PASS) and substantial clinical benefit (SCB) were analyzed among cohorts. Results: Included were 183 patients (SR, n = 13; NT, n = 154; SA, n = 16) with a mean age, body mass index, and femoral torsion of 30.6 ± 12.1 years, 24.0 ± 4.4 kg/m2, and 12.55° ± 9.58°, respectively. The mean torsion was –4.5° ± 2.6° for the SR, 12.1° ± 6.8° for the NT, and 31.0° ± 3.6° for the SA group. There were between-group differences in the proportion of patients who achieved PASS and SCB on the iHOT-12, pain VAS, and any PRO ( P < .05). Post hoc analysis indicated that the SA group achieved lower rates of PASS and SCB on the iHOT-12 and pain VAS, and lower rates of PASS on any PRO versus the SR group ( P < .05); the SR group achieved higher rates of PASS and SCB on pain VAS scores versus the NT group ( P = .003). Conclusion: The orientation and severity of femoral torsion during hip arthroscopy influenced the propensity for clinically significant outcome improvement. Specifically, patients with femoral retrotorsion and femoral antetorsion had higher and lower rates of clinically significant outcome improvement, respectively.

scholarly journals Incidence of venous thromboembolism in Asian patients undergoing anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction without the use of mechanical or chemical prophylaxis

2021 ◽  
Vol 28 ◽  
pp. 221049172199431
Author(s):  
Xuan Liu ◽  
Andrew Hwee Chye Tan
Keyword(s):  
Anterior Cruciate Ligament ◽  
Venous Thromboembolism ◽  
Acl Reconstruction ◽  
Cruciate Ligament ◽  
Single Bundle ◽  
Tertiary Institution ◽  
Asian Patients ◽  
Venous Thromboembolic Events ◽  
Clinically Significant ◽  
Anterior Cruciate

Background: Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is a clinically relevant complication of major orthopedic surgeries. The prevalence of VTE and the indications for VTE thromboprophylaxis in Asian patients undergoing arthroscopic anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction are not clear. This study aims to evaluate the prevalence of clinically significant venous thromboembolic events (VTE) in Asian patients undergoing arthroscopic ACL reconstruction without mechanical or chemical thromboprophylaxis. Methods: All patients who underwent ACL reconstruction by a single surgeon from 2006 to 2018 in a single tertiary institution were reviewed. The inclusion criteria for the study included Asian patients of common ethnic groups in Singapore (Chinese, Malay, Indian) and underwent primary or revision ACL reconstruction, or ACL reconstruction combined with meniscal surgery. The exclusion criteria were patients with incomplete medical records, pre-existing anticoagulant treatment within 1 year prior to the surgery and additional procedures that altered the standard rehabilitation protocol, less than 6 months of follow-up duration. All patients received general anesthesia. The single-bundle ACL technique with autologous hamstring tendon reconstruction was performed. No chemical DVT prophylaxis was given. The patients were screened for clinically for VTE. Symptomatic patients were referred for ultrasonography. Results: Of the 581 patients reviewed, 3 patients had a clinical suspicion of deep vein thrombosis, but subsequent ultrasonography showed no thrombosis. Hence, the prevalence of clinically significant VTE was 0%. Conclusion: Given the low prevalence of clinically significant VTE, there is no need for routine mechanical or chemical thromboprophylaxis or radiologic screening in Asian patients undergoing arthroscopic ACL reconstruction.

scholarly journals Effect of Capsular Closure After Hip Arthroscopy for Femoroacetabular Impingement Syndrome on Achieving Clinically Meaningful Outcomes: A Meta-analysis of Prospective and Comparative Studies

2021 ◽  
Vol 9 (6) ◽  
pp. 232596712110174
Author(s):  
Kyle N. Kunze ◽  
Amar Vadhera ◽  
Annie Devinney ◽  
Benedict U. Nwachukwu ◽  
Bryan T. Kelly ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Femoroacetabular Impingement ◽  
Comparative Studies ◽  
Hip Arthroscopy ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Impingement Syndrome ◽  
Harris Hip Score ◽  
Femoroacetabular Impingement Syndrome ◽  
Outcome Improvement ◽  
Clinically Significant

Background: Recent literature has demonstrated conflicting evidence as to whether capsular closure after hip arthroscopy for femoroacetabular impingement syndrome (FAIS) results in superior outcomes compared with capsulotomy without repair. Additionally, these studies have not explored the effect of capsular management on clinically significant outcome improvement. Purpose: To perform a meta-analysis of prospective and comparative studies to determine whether capsular management influences the rate of clinically significant outcome improvement after hip arthroscopy for FAIS. Study Design: Systematic review; Level of evidence, 3. Methods: PubMed, OVID/Medline, EMBASE, and Cochrane databases were queried in September 2020 for studies with evidence levels 1 to 3 that directly compared capsular management cohorts and reported rates of achieving the minimal clinically important difference (MCID) at a minimum follow-up of 2 years. Studies of level 4 evidence, those not describing or directly comparing capsular management techniques as well as those not reporting the MCID were excluded. Methodological quality was assessed using the methodological index for nonrandomized studies tool. Mantel-Haenszel fixed-effects models were constructed to quantitatively evaluate the association between capsular management and achievement of the MCID by generating effect estimates in the form of relative risk (RR) with 95% CIs. Results: A total of 6 studies with 1611 patients were included. The overall pooled rate of MCID achievement for the modified Harris Hip Score (mHHS), Hip Outcome Score Activities of Daily Living (HOS-ADL), and HOS Sports Subscale (HOS-SS) were 84.4%, 80.3%, and 82.5%, respectively, at a mean follow-up of 40.8 months (range, 24-87.6 months). Capsular closure was associated with a significantly higher rate of MCID achievement for the mHHS (RR, 1.06; 95% CI, 1.01-1.10; P = .001) and trended toward statistical significance for the HOS-ADL (RR, 1.11; 95% CI, 1.0-1.24; P = .055) and the HOS-SS (RR, 1.09; 95% CI, 0.99-1.21; P = .094). Conclusion: Although capsular closure appeared to result in higher rates of clinically significant outcome improvement in hip function, there was no definitively increased likelihood of achieving clinically significant improvement in relevant hip outcome scores with capsular closure.

scholarly journals Independent Versus Transtibial Drilling in Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Meta-analysis With Meta-regression

2021 ◽  
Vol 9 (7) ◽  
pp. 232596712110156
Author(s):  
Marco Cuzzolin ◽  
Davide Previtali ◽  
Marco Delcogliano ◽  
Giuseppe Filardo ◽  
Christian Candrian ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Anterior Cruciate Ligament ◽  
Acl Reconstruction ◽  
Cruciate Ligament ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Cochrane Library ◽  
Pivot Shift Test ◽  
Clinically Significant ◽  
Anterior Cruciate ◽  
Femoral Tunnel Drilling ◽  
Tibial Translation

Background: Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction can be performed with different techniques for independent and transtibial (TT) drilling of femoral tunnels, but there is still no consensus on which approach leads to the best outcome. Purpose: To assess whether the independent or TT drilling approach for ACL reconstruction leads to the best functional outcomes. Study Design: Systematic review; Level of evidence, 2. Methods: A systematic literature search was conducted on July 1, 2020, using the PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, and Scopus databases. The influence of different femoral drilling techniques was analyzed through a meta-analysis in terms of patient-reported outcome measure scores, risk of complications, range of motion limitations, graft failure, and differential laxity. Subanalyses were performed to compare the different independent drilling techniques considered. Linear metaregression was performed to evaluate if the year of study publication influenced the results. The risk of bias and quality of evidence were assessed following the Cochrane guidelines. Results: A total of 22 randomized controlled trials including 1658 patients were included in the meta-analysis. Both International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) subjective score and Lysholm score were higher with the independent drilling approach (mean difference [MD], 1.24 [ P = .02] and 0.55 [ P = .005], respectively). No difference was documented in terms of the risk of reinjury, but independent drilling led to reduced KT-1000 arthrometer–assessed anterior tibial translation (MD, 0.23; P = .01) and a higher probability of a negative postoperative pivot-shift test finding (risk ratio, 1.13; P = .04). There were no significant differences in IKDC objective or Tegner scores. A P value of .07 was found for the association between the year of the study and IKDC objective scores. Conclusion: Independent femoral tunnel drilling provided better results than the TT approach, although the difference was not clinically significant. No difference was observed in the risk of reinjury. Increasingly better results were seen among surgical procedures performed in more recent years. Among the independent drilling options, the anteromedial portal technique seemed to provide the most favorable outcomes. The lack of clinically significant differences and the promising outcomes reported with new modified TT techniques suggest the importance of correct placement, rather than the tunnel drilling approach, to optimize the results of ACL reconstruction.

Arthroscopic Treatment of Femoroacetabular Impingement in Adolescents Provides Clinically Significant Outcome Improvement

2017 ◽  
Vol 33 (10) ◽  
pp. 1812-1818 ◽  
Author(s):  
Benedict U. Nwachukwu ◽  
Brenda Chang ◽  
Cynthia A. Kahlenberg ◽  
Kara Fields ◽  
Danyal H. Nawabi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Femoroacetabular Impingement ◽  
Arthroscopic Treatment ◽  
Outcome Improvement ◽  
Clinically Significant

scholarly journals How Should We Define Clinically Significant Outcome Improvement on the iHOT-12?

2018 ◽  
Vol 15 (2) ◽  
pp. 103-108 ◽  
Author(s):  
Benedict U. Nwachukwu ◽  
Brenda Chang ◽  
Edward C. Beck ◽  
William H. Neal ◽  
Kamran Movassaghi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Outcome Improvement ◽  
Clinically Significant

Time Required to Achieve Minimal Clinically Important Difference and Substantial Clinical Benefit After Arthroscopic Treatment of Femoroacetabular Impingement

2018 ◽  
Vol 46 (11) ◽  
pp. 2601-2606 ◽  
Author(s):  
Benedict U. Nwachukwu ◽  
Brenda Chang ◽  
Joshua Adjei ◽  
William W. Schairer ◽  
Anil S. Ranawat ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Femoroacetabular Impingement ◽  
Clinical Benefit ◽  
Hip Arthroscopy ◽  
Minimal Clinically Important Difference ◽  
Arthroscopic Treatment ◽  
Clinically Important Difference ◽  
Substantial Clinical Benefit ◽  
Outcome Improvement ◽  
Clinically Significant

Background: Minimal clinically important difference (MCID) defines the minimum degree of quantifiable outcome improvement that a patient perceives as the result of an intervention or in the process of healing. Substantial clinical benefit (SCB) defines the amount of quantifiable outcome improvement that is needed for a patient to feel substantially better. Little is known about when clinically significant outcome improvement is achieved. Purpose: To investigate the time-dependent nature of MCID and SCB after hip arthroscopy for femoroacetabular impingement (FAI). Study Design: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 2. Methods: An institutional hip preservation registry was queried. The modified Harris Hip Score, Hip Outcome Score, and 33-item International Hip Outcome Tool (iHOT-33) were administered to patients undergoing hip arthroscopy for FAI. Follow-up times for outcome measures were classified into 3 periods: 5 to 11 months (6 months), 12 to 23 months (1 year), and 24 to 35 months (2 years). Cumulative probabilities for achieving MCID and SCB were calculated with Kaplan-Meier survival curve analysis and interval censoring. A Weibull parametric regression analysis evaluated the odds of achieving earlier MCID. Results: A total of 719 patients undergoing primary hip arthroscopy were included. The mean ± SD age was 32.5 ± 10.5 years, and the majority were female (n = 380, 52.9%). Across all 4 outcome instruments, patients had the highest probability for achieving MCID and SCB by the 6-month postoperative period. The iHOT-33 demonstrated the highest probability for capturing MCID and SCB improvement at each of the 3 periods, with 76.0%, 84.8%, and 93.6% achieving MCID by 6 months, 1 year, and 2 years, respectively. Similarly, the probabilities of achieving SCB on the iHOT-33 were as follows: 57.1%, 68.0%, and 71.7%. A similar trend was demonstrated across other outcome tools. Older male patients and those with Outerbridge classification 1 to 4 (vs grade 0) had a significantly increased risk for taking a longer time to achieve MCID and SCB. Additionally, patients with higher preoperative outcome scores took a longer time to achieve MCID and SCB. Conclusion: At least half of patients treated with hip arthroscopy for FAI achieve MCID and SCB within the first 6 months after the procedure. However, clinically significant outcome improvement continues to be attained until 2 years postoperatively. Female patients, younger individuals, and those without chondral defects achieve faster clinical outcome improvement. These findings can be helpful for establishing shared decision-making aids and follow-up guidelines for arthroscopic treatment of FAI.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document