scholarly journals On the difference between the maximum multiplicity and path cover number for tree-like graphs

2005 ◽  
Vol 409 ◽  
pp. 13-31 ◽  
Author(s):  
Francesco Barioli ◽  
Shaun Fallat ◽  
Leslie Hogben
10.37236/525 ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 18 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Cheng Yeaw Ku ◽  
Kok Bin Wong

Let $G$ be a graph. It is well known that the maximum multiplicity of a root of the matching polynomial $\mu(G,x)$ is at most the minimum number of vertex disjoint paths needed to cover the vertex set of $G$. Recently, a necessary and sufficient condition for which this bound is tight was found for trees. In this paper, a similar structural characterization is proved for any graph. To accomplish this, we extend the notion of a $(\theta,G)$-extremal path cover (where $\theta$ is a root of $\mu(G,x)$) which was first introduced for trees to general graphs. Our proof makes use of the analogue of the Gallai-Edmonds Structure Theorem for general root. By way of contrast, we also show that the difference between the minimum size of a path cover and the maximum multiplicity of matching polynomial roots can be arbitrarily large.


IEEE Access ◽  
2021 ◽  
pp. 1-1
Author(s):  
Huiqing Liu ◽  
Jian Lu ◽  
Shunzhe Zhang ◽  
Xiuyu Zhong
Keyword(s):  

2015 ◽  
Vol 8 (1) ◽  
pp. 147-167 ◽  
Author(s):  
Adam Berliner ◽  
Cora Brown ◽  
Joshua Carlson ◽  
Nathanael Cox ◽  
Leslie Hogben ◽  
...  

2004 ◽  
Vol 392 ◽  
pp. 289-303 ◽  
Author(s):  
Francesco Barioli ◽  
Shaun Fallat ◽  
Leslie Hogben

2019 ◽  
Vol 14 (2) ◽  
pp. 49-56
Author(s):  
Kenneth B. Larena ◽  
Michael P. Baldado Jr.

Author(s):  
Minerva Catral ◽  
Anna Cepek ◽  
Leslie Hogben ◽  
My Huynh ◽  
Kirill Lazebnik ◽  
...  

10.37236/170 ◽  
2009 ◽  
Vol 16 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Cheng Yeaw Ku ◽  
K. B. Wong

We give a necessary and sufficient condition for the maximum multiplicity of a root of the matching polynomial of a tree to be equal to the minimum number of vertex disjoint paths needed to cover it.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document