Iron carbide as a source of carbon for graphite and diamond formation under lithospheric mantle P-T parameters

Lithos ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 286-287 ◽  
pp. 151-161 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yuliya V. Bataleva ◽  
Yuri N. Palyanov ◽  
Yuri M. Borzdov ◽  
Oleg A. Bayukov ◽  
Evgeniy V. Zdrokov
2021 ◽  
Vol 7 (4) ◽  
pp. eabb4644
Author(s):  
Yuri N. Palyanov ◽  
Yuri M. Borzdov ◽  
Alexander G. Sokol ◽  
Yuliya V. Bataleva ◽  
Igor N. Kupriyanov ◽  
...  

Most natural diamonds are formed in Earth’s lithospheric mantle; however, the exact mechanisms behind their genesis remain debated. Given the occurrence of electrochemical processes in Earth’s mantle and the high electrical conductivity of mantle melts and fluids, we have developed a model whereby localized electric fields play a central role in diamond formation. Here, we experimentally demonstrate a diamond crystallization mechanism that operates under lithospheric mantle pressure-temperature conditions (6.3 and 7.5 gigapascals; 1300° to 1600°C) through the action of an electric potential applied across carbonate or carbonate-silicate melts. In this process, the carbonate-rich melt acts as both the carbon source and the crystallization medium for diamond, which forms in assemblage with mantle minerals near the cathode. Our results clearly demonstrate that electric fields should be considered a key additional factor influencing diamond crystallization, mantle mineral–forming processes, carbon isotope fractionation, and the global carbon cycle.


2009 ◽  
Vol 46 (2) ◽  
pp. 139-154 ◽  
Author(s):  
Erşan Türkoğlu ◽  
Martyn Unsworth ◽  
Dinu Pana

Geophysical studies of upper mantle structure can provide constraints on diamond formation. Teleseismic and magnetotelluric data can be used in diamond exploration by mapping the depth of the lithosphere–asthenosphere boundary. Studies in the central Slave Craton and at Fort-à-la-Corne have detected conductors in the lithospheric mantle close to, or beneath, diamondiferous kimberlites. Graphite can potentially explain the enhanced conductivity and may imply the presence of diamonds at greater depth. Petrologic arguments suggest that the shallow lithospheric mantle may be too oxidized to contain graphite. Other diamond-bearing regions show no upper mantle conductor suggesting that the correlation with diamondiferous kimberlites is not universal. The Buffalo Head Hills in Alberta host diamondiferous kimberlites in a Proterozoic terrane and may have formed in a subduction zone setting. Long period magnetotelluric data were used to investigate the upper mantle resistivity structure of this region. Magnetotelluric (MT) data were recorded at 23 locations on a north–south profile extending from Fort Vermilion to Utikuma Lake and an east–west profile at 57.2°N. The data were combined with Lithoprobe MT data and inverted to produce a three-dimensional (3-D) resistivity model with the asthenosphere at 180–220 km depth. This model did not contain an upper mantle conductor beneath the Buffalo Head Hills kimberlites. The 3-D inversion exhibited an eastward dipping conductor in the crust beneath the Kiskatinaw terrane that could represent the fossil subduction zone that supplied the carbon for diamond formation. The low resistivity at crustal depths in this structure is likely due to graphite derived from subducted organic material.


2015 ◽  
Vol 463 (1) ◽  
pp. 707-711 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yu. V. Bataleva ◽  
Yu. N. Palyanov ◽  
Yu. M. Borzdov ◽  
O. A. Bayukov ◽  
N. V. Sobolev

2016 ◽  
Vol 471 (1) ◽  
pp. 1144-1148 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yu. V. Bataleva ◽  
Yu. N. Palyanov ◽  
Yu. M. Borzdov ◽  
N. V. Sobolev

Author(s):  
Z. A. Karpovich ◽  
◽  
E. I. Zhimulev ◽  

The problem of diamond formation, despite the huge amount of accumulated information, has not been finally resolved. Currently, the most well-established hypothesis is that the diamond will be formed as a result of metasomatosis. According to this theory, the source of carbon were fluids of C-H-O-N-S composition. There are still questions concerning the environment for diamond crystallization. One of the most common inclusions in diamonds from kimberlite tubes are sulfides. They are also represented in diamondiferous xenoliths of peridotite and eclogite from diamondiferous tubes, but their quantity in diamonds is still higher in comparison with xenoliths. Modern scientific researches allow to assert that large diamonds, such as Kullinan (3106 carats), Koh-i-Noor, etc., were formed at great depths of about 360 – 750 km. Inclusions in these diamonds are, along with silicate minerals, iron-nickel alloy, iron-nickel carbide and sulfide (pyrrhotite). The present study is devoted to studying the model growth environment of a diamond in the Fe-C-S system with a sulfur content of 3 wt. % in relation to iron. The experiments of 0.5 hours duration were carried out at 6 GPa and 1450 С on a high-pressure apparatus of "cutting sphere" type. As a result, diamond synthesis was obtained. The following phases were recorded during the analysis of growth medium composition (metal-sulfide sintering): solid solution of carbon in iron, iron sulfide, iron carbide. Iron sulfide is represented by pyrrhotite. Thus, the phases established in solid products of the experiments fully correspond to the phases isolated from inclusions of natural diamonds.


2016 ◽  
Vol 57 (1) ◽  
pp. 176-189 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yu.V. Bataleva ◽  
Yu.N. Palyanov ◽  
Yu.M. Borzdov ◽  
O.A. Bayukov ◽  
N.V. Sobolev

2015 ◽  
Vol 56 (1-2) ◽  
pp. 280-295 ◽  
Author(s):  
N.P. Pokhilenko ◽  
A.M. Agashev ◽  
K.D. Litasov ◽  
L.N. Pokhilenko

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document