Marine reserve more sustainable than gear restriction in maintaining long-term coral reef fisheries yields

Marine Policy ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 128 ◽  
pp. 104478
Author(s):  
Tim R. McClanahan
2015 ◽  
Vol 529 ◽  
pp. 233-248 ◽  
Author(s):  
GR Russ ◽  
KI Miller ◽  
JR Rizzari ◽  
AC Alcala

2005 ◽  
Vol 39 (1) ◽  
pp. 68-73 ◽  
Author(s):  
James Lindholm ◽  
Sarah Fangman ◽  
Les Kaufman ◽  
Steven Miller

We surgically implanted coded-acoustic transmitters in a total of 46 coral reef fish during a saturation mission to the Aquarius Undersea Laboratory in August 2002. Aquarius is located within the Conch Reef Research Only Area, a no-take marine reserve in the northern Florida Keys National Marine Sanctuary. Over the course of 10 days, with daily bottom times of 7 hrs, saturation diving operations allowed us to collect, surgically tag, release, and subsequently track fishes entirely in situ. Fish were collected using baited traps deployed adjacent to the reef as well as nets manipulated on the bottom by divers. Surgical implantation of acoustic transmitters was conducted at a mobile surgical station that was moved to different sites across the reef. Each fish was revived from anesthetic and released as divers swam the fish about the reef. Short-term tracking of tagged fish was conducted by saturation divers, while long-term fish movement was recorded by a series of acoustic receivers deployed on the seafloor. Though not designed as an explicit comparison with surface tagging operations, the benefits of working entirely in situ were apparent.


Coral Reefs ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 31 (1) ◽  
pp. 13-26 ◽  
Author(s):  
P. Houk ◽  
K. Rhodes ◽  
J. Cuetos-Bueno ◽  
S. Lindfield ◽  
V. Fread ◽  
...  

2012 ◽  
Vol 64 (6) ◽  
pp. 1129-1135 ◽  
Author(s):  
Pi-Jen Liu ◽  
Pei-Jie Meng ◽  
Li-Lian Liu ◽  
Jih-Terng Wang ◽  
Ming-Yih Leu

2002 ◽  
Vol 59 (3) ◽  
pp. 405-415 ◽  
Author(s):  
P Apostolaki ◽  
E J Milner-Gulland ◽  
M K McAllister ◽  
G P Kirkwood

We present a model of the effects of a marine reserve on spawning stock biomass (SSB) and short- and long-term yield for a size-structured species that exhibits seasonal movements. The model considers the effects of protecting nursery and (or) spawning grounds under a range of fishing mortalities and fish mobility rates. We consider two extremes of effort redistribution following reserve establishment and analyze the effects of a reserve when the fishery targets either mature or immature fish. We apply the model to the Mediterranean hake (Merluccius merluccius) and show that a marine reserve could be highly beneficial for this species. We demonstrate benefits from reserves not just for overexploited stocks of low-mobility species, but also (to a lesser extent) for underexploited stocks and high-mobility species. Greatly increased resilience to overfishing is also found in the majority of cases. We show that a reserve provides benefits additional to those obtained from simple effort control. Benefits from reserves depend to a major extent on the amount of effort redistribution following reserve establishment and on fishing selectivity; hence, these factors should be key components of any evaluation of reserve effectiveness.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document