Processing of famous faces and medial temporal lobe event-related potentials: a depth electrode study

NeuroImage ◽  
2005 ◽  
Vol 25 (2) ◽  
pp. 401-407 ◽  
Author(s):  
T. Dietl ◽  
P. Trautner ◽  
M. Staedtgen ◽  
M. Vannuchi ◽  
A. Mecklinger ◽  
...  
2007 ◽  
Vol 38 (3) ◽  
pp. 168-171 ◽  
Author(s):  
Wuttichai V. Chayasirisobhon ◽  
Sirichai Chayasirisobhon ◽  
Sue Nwe Tin ◽  
Ngoc Leu ◽  
Keo Tehrani ◽  
...  

We studied scalp-recorded auditory event-related potentials (ERPs) of 30 untreated patients with new-onset temporal lobe epilepsy and 30 age-and sex-matched normal controls. This study was designed to eliminate the effects of intractability of seizures and chronic use of antiepileptic drugs on P300 auditory ERPs. There were no statistically significant differences in both latency and amplitude of P300 between the two groups. Similar methods were also used to analyze component latencies and amplitudes of ERPs of 9 patients who had hippocampal sclerosis with comparison to control subjects. There were no statistically significant differences between these two groups as well. Our study evidently does not support temporal lobe sources of P300 scalp-recorded auditory ERPs. We also conclude that the scalp-recorded auditory ERPs procedure is not a useful tool to evaluate temporal lobe epilepsy.


2014 ◽  
Vol 16 (1) ◽  
pp. 67-73 ◽  
Author(s):  
Artemios K. Artemiadis ◽  
Maria Fili ◽  
George Papadopoulos ◽  
Fotini Christidi ◽  
Stergios Gatzonis ◽  
...  

2008 ◽  
Vol 78 (2-3) ◽  
pp. 207-215 ◽  
Author(s):  
Thomas Dietl ◽  
Martin Kurthen ◽  
Dietmar Kirch ◽  
Mario Staedtgen ◽  
Carlo Schaller ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 120 (2) ◽  
pp. 812-829 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dawei Shen ◽  
Dominique T. Vuvan ◽  
Claude Alain

Attentional blink (AB) refers to the situation where correctly identifying a target impairs the processing of a subsequent probe in a sequence of stimuli. Although the AB often coincides with a modulation of scalp-recorded cognitive event-related potentials (ERPs), the neural sources of this effect remain unclear. In two separate experiments, we used classical LORETA analysis recursively applied (CLARA) to estimate the neural sources of ERPs elicited by an auditory probe when it immediately followed an auditory target (i.e., AB condition), when no auditory target was present (i.e., no-AB condition), and when the probe followed an auditory target but occurred outside of the AB time window (i.e., no-AB condition). We observed a processing deficit when the probe immediately followed the target, and this auditory AB was accompanied by reduced P3b amplitude. Contrasting brain electrical source activity from the AB and no-AB conditions revealed reduced source activity in the medial temporal region as well as in the temporoparietal junction (extending into inferior parietal lobe), ventromedial prefrontal cortex, left anterior thalamic nuclei, mammillary body, and left cerebellum. The results indicate that successful probe identification following a target relies on a widely distributed brain network and further support the suggestion that the auditory AB reflects the failure of the probe to reach short-term consolidation. NEW & NOTEWORTHY Within a rapid succession of auditory stimuli, the perception of a predefined target sound often impedes listeners’ ability to detect another target sound that is presented close in succession. This attentional blink may be related to activity in brain areas supporting attention and memory. We show that the auditory attentional blink is associated with brain activity changes in a network including the medial temporal lobe, parietal cortex, and prefrontal cortex. This study suggests that a problem in the interaction between attention and memory underlies the auditory attentional blink.


2016 ◽  
Vol 108 ◽  
pp. 90
Author(s):  
Amanda G. Jaimes-Bautista ◽  
Mario Rodríguez-Camacho ◽  
Yaneth Rodríguez-Agudelo ◽  
Iris E. Martínez-Juárez

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document