Social-ecological regime shifts (SERS) in coastal systems

2018 ◽  
Vol 161 ◽  
pp. 84-95 ◽  
Author(s):  
Prateep Kumar Nayak ◽  
Derek Armitage
2008 ◽  
pp. n/a-n/a ◽  
Author(s):  
Jan Kloppenborg Møller ◽  
Jacob Carstensen ◽  
Henrik Madsen ◽  
Tom Andersen

Ecosystems ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 15 (8) ◽  
pp. 1336-1350 ◽  
Author(s):  
Linda Randsalu-Wendrup ◽  
Daniel J. Conley ◽  
Jacob Carstensen ◽  
Ian Snowball ◽  
Catherine Jessen ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 88 (4) ◽  
pp. 694-715 ◽  
Author(s):  
Delphi F. L. Ward ◽  
Simon Wotherspoon ◽  
Jessica Melbourne-Thomas ◽  
Jessica Haapkylä ◽  
Craig R. Johnson

2013 ◽  
Vol 6 (3) ◽  
pp. 359-372 ◽  
Author(s):  
Steven J. Lade ◽  
Alessandro Tavoni ◽  
Simon A. Levin ◽  
Maja Schlüter

2020 ◽  
Vol 6 (41) ◽  
pp. eabc0276
Author(s):  
Xutong Wu ◽  
Yongping Wei ◽  
Bojie Fu ◽  
Shuai Wang ◽  
Yan Zhao ◽  
...  

Understanding the regime shifts of social-ecological systems (SES) and their local and spillover effects over a long time frame is important for future sustainability. We provide a perspective of processes unfolding over time to identify the regime shifts of a SES based on changes in the relationships between SES components while also addressing their drivers and local and spillover effects. The applicability of this approach has been demonstrated by analyzing the evolution over the past 1000 years of the SES in China’s Loess Plateau (LP). Five evolutionary phases were identified: “fast expansion of cultivation,” “slow expansion of cultivation,” “landscape engineering for higher production,” “transition from cultivation to ecological conservation,” and “revegetation for environment.” Our study establishes empirical links between the state (phase) of a SES to its drivers and effects. Lessons of single-goal driven and locally focused SES management in the LP, which did not consider these links, have important implications to long-term planning and policy formulation of SES.


Land ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 9 (4) ◽  
pp. 97
Author(s):  
Therezah Achieng ◽  
Kristine Maciejewski ◽  
Michelle Dyer ◽  
Reinette Biggs

This study explored the shift in land use from livestock farming to game farming in the Eastern Cape, South Africa, from a social-ecological regime shift perspective. A regime shift can be defined as a large, persistent change in the structure and function of the intertwined social and ecological components of a landscape. This research focused on the Amakhala game reserve as a case study to understand how the shift affected the provision of ecosystem services and human wellbeing. We used remote sensing techniques to quantify changes in vegetation and found evidence of vegetation recovery following the shift. We then conducted interviews with both landowners and farmworkers and used participatory mapping to understand their perceptions of the main drivers and social-ecological impacts of the shift in land use. Social narratives revealed stark differences in different stakeholders’ perceptions, highlighting that the change in land use had varied implications for, and were perceived differently by, different stakeholders. Farmworkers emphasized changes in social structures that weakened community bonds and erased valued connections to the land. At the same time, they increased employment of women, skills development, and increased wages as benefits of the new game farming regime. Landowners, on the other hand, indicated financial gains from the land use change. The transition therefore resulted in trade-offs that surfaced as social, economic, and cultural losses and gains. These changes, especially in social relationships and community structures, have implications for resilience and possible future pathways of development in the region.


Author(s):  
Laura M. Pereira ◽  
Scott Drimie ◽  
Kristi Maciejewski ◽  
Patrick Bon Tonissen ◽  
Reinette (Oonsie) Biggs

Sustainably achieving the goal of global food security is one of the greatest challenges of the 21st century. The current food system is failing to meet the needs of people, and at the same time, is having far-reaching impacts on the environment and undermining human well-being in other important ways. It is increasingly apparent that a deep transformation in the way we produce and consume food is needed in order to ensure a more just and sustainable future. This paper uses the concept of regime shifts to understand key drivers and innovations underlying past disruptions in the food system and to explore how they may help us think about desirable future changes and how we might leverage them. We combine two perspectives on regime shifts—one derived from natural sciences and the other from social sciences—to propose an interpretation of food regimes that draws on innovation theory. We use this conceptualization to discuss three examples of innovations that we argue helped enable critical regime shifts in the global food system in the past: the Haber-Bosch process of nitrogen fixation, the rise of the supermarket, and the call for more transparency in the food system to reconnect consumers with their food. This paper concludes with an exploration of why this combination of conceptual understandings is important across the Global North/ Global South divide, and proposes a new sustainability regime where transformative change is spearheaded by a variety of social–ecological innovations.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document