Laryngeal Trauma: External Approaches

2020 ◽  
Vol 31 (4) ◽  
pp. 317-323
Author(s):  
David Myssiorek ◽  
Ahmed M.S. Soliman
Keyword(s):  
2020 ◽  
Vol 71 (2) ◽  
pp. 100-101
Author(s):  
H. Hatakeyama ◽  
M. Komatsu ◽  
K. Mizoguchi ◽  
N. Oridate

1968 ◽  
Vol 82 (9) ◽  
pp. 825-830
Author(s):  
John Duff
Keyword(s):  

2007 ◽  
Vol 116 (3) ◽  
pp. 192-194 ◽  
Author(s):  
Charles A. Elmaraghy ◽  
Neil Tanna ◽  
Gregory J. Wiet ◽  
D. Richard Kang

1973 ◽  
Vol 59 (1) ◽  
pp. 40-42
Author(s):  
Peter W. Head
Keyword(s):  

1990 ◽  
Vol 55 (3) ◽  
pp. 427-433 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tracey A. Yonick ◽  
Alan R. Reich ◽  
Fred D. Minifie ◽  
B. Raymond Fink

Certain acoustical consequences of endotracheal intubation were examined in 13 male cardiovascular-surgery patients. Each subject recorded three tokens of a sustained vowel 1 day before intubation, 1 day after, upon discharge, and during a follow-up visit. Eight acoustical measures were obtained from the audio-recorded vowels: (a) mean fundamental frequency (Fo), (b) Fostandard deviation, (c) Foperturbation quotient, (d) mean sound pressure level (SPL), (e) SPL standard deviation, (f) SPL perturbation quotient, (g) spectral flatness of the residue signal, and (h) coefficient of excess. Mean Fo, Fostandard deviation, mean SPL, SPL standard deviation, and coefficient of excess did not differ significantly across recording sessions, although certain predictable trends were apparent. Foperturbation quotient, SPL perturbation quotient, and spectral flatness of the residue signal varied significantly across sessions, implying that these acoustical measures may be useful in the identification and monitoring of even minor intubation-related laryngeal trauma.


2017 ◽  
pp. bcr-2017-220070
Author(s):  
Marina Brimioulle ◽  
Matthew King ◽  
Philippe Bowles ◽  
Nicholas Saunders
Keyword(s):  

2005 ◽  
Vol 16 (2) ◽  
pp. 293-297
Author(s):  
Hyo Jin Kim ◽  
Dong Wook Kim ◽  
Byung Don Lee ◽  
Hyuck Soon Chang

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document