scholarly journals Is arthroplasty preferable to internal fixation for the treatment of extracapsular fracture of the upper femur in the elderly?

2016 ◽  
Vol 102 (6) ◽  
pp. 689-694 ◽  
Author(s):  
P. Duriez ◽  
T. Devaux ◽  
C. Chantelot ◽  
N. Baudrier ◽  
J.-Y. Hery ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Internal Fixation ◽  
The Elderly ◽  
Extracapsular Fracture

216 Fix or Replace: Is Internal Fixation Still A Viable Option in The Elderly with Un-Displaced Intracapsular Femoral Neck Fractures?

2021 ◽  
Vol 108 (Supplement_6) ◽  
Author(s):  
R Morris ◽  
A Krishna ◽  
H Hamid ◽  
M Chawda ◽  
H Mumtaz
Keyword(s):  
Femoral Neck ◽  
Internal Fixation ◽  
Revision Surgery ◽  
Retrospective Review ◽  
The Elderly ◽  
Femoral Neck Fractures ◽  
Type I ◽  
Cannulated Screws ◽  
Viable Option ◽  
Displaced Femoral Neck Fractures

Abstract Aim The treatment of impacted or un-displaced femoral neck fractures in the elderly osteoporotic patient is still largely debated, with arthroplasty versus internal fixation two surgical options1. Our aim was to retrospectively review patients over the age of 80 with un-displaced intracapsular hip fractures who had undergone internal fixation and assess their rate of mortality and revision surgery. Method We conducted a retrospective review of all patients with femoral neck fractures over a 4-year period between January 2015 to December 2018. We refined this to only patients over the age of 80 with un-displaced intracapsular femoral neck fractures fixed with cannulated screws. We noted their mental and mobility status, their follow-up attendance over 3 years, their mortality and rate of revision surgery. Results There were a total of 1232 femoral neck fractures in a 4-year period. Of these, 37 were >80 with un-displaced intracapsular femoral neck fractures, with 23 fixed with cannulated screws and 14 with a Dynamic Hip Screw. Mean age – 85, M:F (1:4.75). All patients were either Garden Classification Type I or II. 4% had cognitive impairment. All patients were independently mobile. 83% were followed up for 3 years, with 1 patient (4%) undergoing revision surgery 3 years following cannulated screw fixation. The 30-day mortality rate was 5%. Conclusions The treatment choice for un-displaced intracapsular femoral neck fractures in the elderly remains debateable. Our retrospective review shows that the rate of re-operation is low in patients who have undergone fixation with cannulated screws and so this remains a viable option.

Treatment of Distal Radius Fractures in Women Older than 80 Years: A Preliminary Report of Functional and Radiographic Outcomes after Open Reduction and Internal Fixation

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lili E. Schindelar ◽  
Richard M. McEntee ◽  
Robert E. Gallivan ◽  
Brian Katt ◽  
Pedro K. Beredjiklian
Keyword(s):  
Internal Fixation ◽  
Distal Radius ◽  
Functional Outcomes ◽  
Open Reduction ◽  
The Elderly ◽  
Distal Radius Fractures ◽  
Implant Design ◽  
Complication Rates ◽  
Radius Fractures ◽  
Hardware Failures

Abstract Background Distal radius fractures are one of the most common fractures seen in the elderly. The management of distal radius fractures in the elderly, especially patients older than 80 years, has not been well defined. The purpose of this study was to evaluate operative treatment of distal radius fractures in patients older than 80 years to determine functional outcomes and complication rates. Materials and Methods A retrospective review was performed to identify patients 80 years or older who were treated for a distal radius fracture with open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF). Medical records were reviewed for demographics, medical history, functional outcomes including quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (qDASH), radiographs, and postoperative complications. Results There were 40 patients included for review. Average age was 84 years. The preoperative qDASH score was 69. At 6 months follow-up, the postoperative qDASH score was 13 (p < 0.001). There were five (12.5%) complications reported postoperatively. All fractures healed with adequate radiographic alignment and there were no hardware failures. Conclusion Distal radius fractures in patients older than 80 years treated with ORIF have good functional outcomes and low complication rates. Increased functionality and independence of the elderly, as well as updated implant design can lead to the effective surgical management of these patients. When indicated from a clinical perspective, operative fixation of distal radius fractures should be considered in patients older than 80 years.

scholarly journals Arthroplasty versus Internal Fixation for Displaced Intracapsular Femoral Neck Fracture in the Elderly

2016 ◽  
Vol 129 (21) ◽  
pp. 2630-2638 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chen-Yi Ye ◽  
An Liu ◽  
Ming-Yuan Xu ◽  
Nwofor Samuel Nonso ◽  
Rong-Xin He
Keyword(s):  
Femoral Neck ◽  
Internal Fixation ◽  
Femoral Neck Fracture ◽  
The Elderly ◽  
Neck Fracture ◽  
Intracapsular Femoral Neck Fracture

scholarly journals Comparative Study of Internal Fixation of the Ulna and Distal Ulna Resection in Patients Older Than 70 Years With Distal Radius and Distal Metaphyseal Ulna Fractures

Hand ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 14 (4) ◽  
pp. 540-546
Author(s):  
Jorge G. Boretto ◽  
Ezequiel E. Zaidenberg ◽  
Gerardo L. Gallucci ◽  
Alejandro Sarme ◽  
Pablo De Carli
Keyword(s):  
Internal Fixation ◽  
Distal Radius ◽  
The Elderly ◽  
Acute Management ◽  
Distal Ulna ◽  
Radiographic Appearance ◽  
Patient Demographics ◽  
Ulna Fractures

Background: Acute management of fractures of the distal ulna that are associated with fractures of the distal radius remains difficult, particularly in the elderly. Methods: In this study, we investigated whether internal fixation of the distal ulna is associated with a higher rate of complications than resection of the distal ulna in patients older than 70 years. Twenty-four consecutive patients were included in this study, 12 of whom had undergone open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) of the distal ulna, and 12 who had undergone distal ulna resection. Patients were retrospectively assessed for range of motion, grip strength, pain, and radiographic appearance. The functional outcome was evaluated by the Mayo Wrist Score. Complications were classified according to the Classification of Surgical Complications. Results: There were no differences in patient demographics between the 2 groups, except patient age. Clinical evaluation showed no difference at follow-up; however, there were significantly more complications associated with ORIF compared with resection. Conclusions: The results from our study show that women older than 70 years with fracture of the distal radius and distal ulna have a higher rate of complications if ORIF of the distal ulna is performed. Patients should be warned, by surgeons, of this in cases where ORIF of the distal ulna is suggested.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document