scholarly journals Mapping of the anterior tibial profile to identify accurate reference points for sagittal alignment of tibial component in total knee arthroplasty

2017 ◽  
Vol 103 (6) ◽  
pp. 959-963 ◽  
Author(s):  
G. Cinotti ◽  
E. Caruso ◽  
L. Orsina ◽  
G. La Torre ◽  
F.R. Ripani
Joints ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 01 (04) ◽  
pp. 155-160 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrea Baldini ◽  
Pier Indelli ◽  
Lapo De Luca ◽  
Pierpaolo Mariani ◽  
Massimiliano Marcucci

Purpose: to compare the anterior tibial surface curvature, the Akagi’s line and the medial third of the tibial tubercle in order to assess which is the most reliable landmark for correct tibial component rotational positioning in total knee arthroplasty. Methods: three independent investigators reviewed 124 knee MRI scans. The most suitable tibial baseplate tracing for the Nexgen Total Knee System (Zimmer, Warsaw, USA) was superimposed on the scan matching the anterior tibial cortex with the anterior aspect of the baseplate. The rotation of the tibial baseplate tracing was calculated with respect to the transepicondylar axis (TEA), the medial third of the tibial tubercle line, Akagi’s line and the femoral posterior condylar axis (PCA). Customized software was created and used for analysis of the MRI datasets.The reliability of each measurement was then calculated by using the intraclass correlation coefficient for interobserver agreement. Results: observer agreement on the position of the Akagi’s line was within 3° in 64% of the cases and within 5°in 85% of the cases. Agreement on the position of the medial third of the tibial tubercle was within 3°in 29% of the cases and within 5°in 70% of the cases. Agreement on the localization of the anterior tibial surface curvature was within 3°in 89% of the cases and within 5°in 99% of the cases. Component alignment along the anterior cortex guaranteed full matching ± 3° with the epicondylar axis in 75% of the knees. Conclusions: the anterior tibial surface curvature was found to be a more reliable and more easily identifiable landmark for correct tibial component alignment than either Akagi’s line or the medial third of the tibialtubercle. Level of evidence: level III, retrospective cohort study.


2014 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
pp. 8-12
Author(s):  
Andrea Baldini ◽  
Pier Francesco Indelli ◽  
PT Luca Manfredini ◽  
Massimiliano Marcucci

ABSTRACT Purpose We hypothesized that the anterior tibial surface curvature is a more reliable landmark for correct tibial component rotational positioning in TKA respect to the ‘Akagi’ line and the medial third of the tibial tubercle. Methods Three independent investigators reviewed 124 knee MRI scans, identifying independently the femoral transepicondylar axis (TEA), the femoral posterior condylar axis (PCA), a line connecting the middle of the posterior cruciate ligament and the medial edge of the patellar tendon attachment (Akagi's line), the medial third of the tibial tubercle and the anterior tibial surface curvature. The most appropriate tibial baseplate tracing for the NexGen Total Knee System (Zimmer, Warsaw, USA) was superimposed matching the anterior tibial cortex with its anterior surface. At this point, the rotation of the tibial plate tracing was calculated in respect to the TEA, the medial third of the tibial tubercle line, the Akagi's line and the PCA. Customized software was created and used for analysis of the MRI datasets. Results: The investigators agreed on the localization of the Akagi's line in 64% of the cases within 3° and in 85% of the cases within 5° (minimum –16°, maximum –7°): this landmark might lead to internal rotation of the tibial component. The observers agreed on the localization of the medial third of the tibial tubercle in 29% of the cases within 3° and, in 70% of the cases, within 5° (minimum –4°, maximum +4°): this landmark might lead to external rotation of the tibial component. The investigators agreed on the localization of the anterior tibial surface curvature in 89% of the cases within 3° and in 99% of the cases within 5° (minimum –1°, maximum +4°): component alignment along the anterior cortex guaranteed full matching ±3° to the epicondylar axis in 75% of the knees. Conclusion Alignment of the tibial component, when based on the anterior tibial surface, was more reliable and easier identifiable than either the Akagi's line or the medial third of the tibial tubercle. Level of evidence Level 3 (Retrospective cohort study). Indelli PF, Baldini A, Manfredini L, Marcucci M. Rotational Alignment Landmarks in Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty. The Duke Orthop J 2014;4(1):8-12.


Author(s):  
Francisco Antonio Miralles-Muñoz ◽  
Marta Rubio-Morales ◽  
Laiz Bello-Tejada ◽  
Santiago González-Parreño ◽  
Alejandro Lizaur-Utrilla ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Pablo Besa ◽  
Rafael Vega ◽  
Gerardo Ledermann ◽  
Claudio Calvo ◽  
Manuela Angulo ◽  
...  

AbstractThis study aimed to determine the tibial cut (TC) accuracy using extensor hallucis longus (EHL) tendon as an anatomical landmark to position the total knee arthroplasty (TKA) extramedullary tibial guide (EMTG), and its impact on the TKA mechanical alignment (MA). We retrospectively studied 96 TKA, performed by a single surgeon, using a femoral tailored intramedullary guide technique. Seventeen were prior to the use of the EHL and 79 used the EHL tendon to position the EMTG. We analyzed preoperative and postoperative standing total lower extremity radiographs to determine the tibial component angle (TCA) and the correction in MA, comparing pre-EHL use and post-EHL technique incorporation. Mean TCA was 88.89 degrees and postoperative MA was neutral in 81% of patients. Pre- and postoperative MAs were not correlated. As a conclusion of this study, using the EHL provides a safe and easy way to determine the position of EMTG.


The Knee ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 19 (5) ◽  
pp. 560-563 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ajay Srivastava ◽  
Gregory Y. Lee ◽  
Nikolai Steklov ◽  
Clifford W. Colwell ◽  
Kace A. Ezzet ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 33 (4) ◽  
pp. 1231-1234 ◽  
Author(s):  
Derek F. Amanatullah ◽  
Graham D. Pallante ◽  
Matthieu P. Ollivier ◽  
Alexander W. Hooke ◽  
Matthew P. Abdel ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 27 (4) ◽  
pp. 1270-1279 ◽  
Author(s):  
ShiZhong Gu ◽  
Shinichi Kuriyama ◽  
Shinichiro Nakamura ◽  
Kohei Nishitani ◽  
Hiromu Ito ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kai Lei ◽  
LiMing Liu ◽  
PengFei Yang ◽  
Ran Xiong ◽  
Liu Yang ◽  
...  

Abstract Purpose: Lower limb alignment is crucial in total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Previous studies have shown that robotics and personalized three-dimensional (3D) preoperative planning could improve postoperative alignment accuracy compared with conventional TKA, but comparison between the above two techniques has never been reported. The purpose of this study was to compare the alignment and prosthesis positioning accuracy between robotics and personalized 3D preoperative planning in TKA.Methods: A consecutive series of patients who received TKA in our Center from September 2020 to January 2021 were enrolled. After 1:2 matching, 52 and 104 patients were eventually included in robotics group and personalized 3D preoperative planning group, respectively. Multiple postoperative alignment variables, operation time, tourniquet time, length of hospital stay, hemoglobin (Hb) decrease at 1 and 3 days after operation were recorded and compared.Results: Compared with personalized 3D preoperative planning, robotics had significantly lower frontal tibial component (FTC) angle absolute deviation (P<0.001) and less FTC outliers (P<0.05). The postoperative hip-knee-ankle (HKA) angle and frontal femoral component (FFC) angle were different between two groups, while the absolute deviations were similar. Hb decreases of robotics were significantly lower than those of personalized 3D preoperative planning (P<0.001), while the operation time and tourniquet time were longer (P<0.001).Conclusion: Compared with personalized 3D preoperative planning, robotics has more accurate tibial component coronal alignment and less postoperative Hb decrease, while the operation time is significantly longer.Trial registration: The Chinese Clinical Trial Registry, ChiCTR2000036235. Registered 22 August 2020, http://www.chictr.org.cn/showproj.aspx?proj=59300


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document