Opening Wedge High Tibial Osteotomy with Combined Use of Patient-Specific 3D-Printed Plates and Taylor Spatial Frame for the Treatment of Knee Osteoarthritis

Background. High tibial osteotomy (HTO) is used to treat medial degeneration of the osteoarthritis (OA) knee. However, shortcomings still exist in the current procedure, like unprecise creation, inability to correct knee rotation, and internal fixed failure. Here, we reported a novel procedure: patient-specific 3D-printed plates for opening wedge high tibial osteotomy (OWHTO) combined with Taylor spatial frame (TSF). The detailed technique was described, and the clinical outcomes were evaluated. Methods. We prospectively evaluate outcomes of patient-specific 3D-printed plates for OWHTO with use of TSF in 25 patients with knee OA and varus alignment. Postoperative efficacy was evaluated using the HSS knee score, pain visual simulation score (VAS), and knee joint motion (ROM), and lower limb alignment was evaluated by measuring femorotibial angle (FTA) and hip-knee-ankle (HKA). Results and Conclusion. All patients did not experience complications such as wound infection, nerve damage, or bone amputation. 25 patients were followed up for 6–18 months. The bony union at bone amputation was achieved in 3 months after surgery, and the pain symptoms were significantly alleviated or disappeared. The VAS score was significantly reduced in 6 months after surgery compared with preoperative; the HSSS score was significantly added in 6 months after surgery compared with preoperative. The ROM of knee joint increased significantly 6 months after operation compared with that before operation, and the difference was statically significant ( P < 0.05 ). The FTA and HKA after operation were significantly superior to that before operation, and the difference was statically significant ( P < 0.01 ). Conclusions. Our study showed that patient-specific 3D-printed plates for HTO with the use of TSF have the advantages of small trauma, few complications, simple operation, and fast recovery in treating knee OA and varus alignment.

Older age and varus alignment lead to early failure in treating patellofemoral osteoarthritis with Fulkerson osteotomy

Background: It is unclear the risk factors for the failure of modified Fulkerson osteotomy. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed 40 patients who underwent the modified Fulkerson osteotomy from 1998 to 2015. There were 4 males and 36 females. The mean age of the study group was 50.2 ± 11.2 years. We used standard anteriorization measuring 10–15 mm and medialization measuring 10 mm while maintaining an intact periosteal sleeve. Results: Both the patellofemoral angle and the congruence angle improved significantly after 5.9 years. Preoperatively, the mean preoperative Lysholm score was 56.12, and the Knee Society score was 60.52. At the final follow-up, these scores improved significantly to 88.75 and 86.49, respectively. However, eight patients (20%) underwent total knee arthroplasty in the follow-up period, five of whom underwent the operation within 5 years. Comparing the survival and non-survival groups, there was a significant difference of an older age in the TKA conversion group (survival: 48.3 ± 11.1; non-survival: 57.8 ± 8.7, p = 0.03). For knee alignment, the non-survival group had a mean valgus femorotibial angle of 1.8° ± 4.9° preoperatively, and the survival group had a mean valgus angle of 6.4° ± 4.5° ( p = 0.03). Conclusions: we found that patients with older age and those with varus alignment have an increased risk of deteriorated medial femorotibial cartilage.

Correction of Varus Alignment with Peripheral Osteophyte Removal during Total Knee Arthroplasty: An Assessment with Computer Navigation

Techniques for symmetrical balancing in flexion and extension have been described; however, the ideal technique is unclear. This study aimed to clarify whether resection of peripheral osteophytes could restore neutral hip–knee–ankle (HKA) angle of varus deformity of arthritic knees. Data from 90 varus arthritic knees that had undergone total knee arthroplasty (TKA) using a nonimage-based navigation system were analyzed. The change in the coronal mechanical axis, while applying manual valgus stress at extension and 90 degrees of knee flexion, was recorded after the following sequential procedures: (1) anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) sectioning, (2) subperiosteal stripping of the deep medial collateral ligament (MCL) from the underlying osteophytes on the medial tibia, and (3) complete removal of peripheral osteophytes from the proximal medial tibia and distal medial femoral condyle. Repeated measures of analysis of variance (ANOVA) were performed to compare the varus angle among each step, and a post hoc analysis by paired t-test was utilized to compare the parameters between baseline and each step. The varus alignment with valgus stress at extension and 90 degrees of flexion (mean: 6.0 ± 3.6 and 5.2 ± 3.9 degrees of varus, respectively) was significantly corrected to a near-neutral mechanical axis (mean: 0.9 ± 2.4 and 1.4 ± 4.2 degrees of varus, respectively) after peripheral osteophyte resection (p < 0.01, both). In many cases, varus deformity of arthritic knees could be corrected to near-neutral HKA angle by applying manual valgus stress after complete peripheral osteophyte resection. These procedures could facilitate soft tissue balancing in TKA, minimizing the risk of overrelease of the medial soft tissues.

Assessment of Hindfoot Alignment Comparing Weightbearing Radiography to Weightbearing Computed Tomography

Background: Hindfoot alignment view (HAV) radiographs are widely utilized for 2-dimensional (2D) radiographic assessment of hindfoot alignment; however, the development of weightbearing computed tomography (WBCT) may provide more accurate methods of quantifying 3-dimensional (3D) hindfoot alignment. The aim of this study was to compare the 2D calcaneal moment arm measurements on HAV radiographs with WBCT. Methods: This retrospective cohort study included 375 consecutive patients with both HAV radiographs and WBCT imaging. Measurement of the 2D hindfoot alignment moment arm was compared between both imaging modalities. The potential confounding influence of valgus/varus/neutral alignment, presence of hardware, and motion artifact were further analyzed. Results: The intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) of interobserver and intraobserver reliability for measurements with both imaging modalities were excellent. Both modalities were highly correlated (Spearman coefficient, 0.930; P < .001). HAV radiographs exhibited a mean calcaneal moment arm difference of 3.9 mm in the varus direction compared with WBCT (95% CI, –4.9 to 12.8). The difference of hindfoot alignment between both modalities was comparable in subgroups with neutral/valgus/varus alignment, presence of hardware, and motion artifact. Conclusion: Both HAV radiographs and WBCT are highly reliable and highly correlated imaging methods for assessing hindfoot alignment. Measurements were not influenced by severe malalignment, the presence of hardware, or motion artifact on WBCT. On average, HAV radiographs overestimated 3.9 mm of varus alignment as compared with WBCT. Level of Evidence: Level III, retrospective comparative study.

Mild to Moderate Varus Alignment in Relation to Surgical Repair of a Medial Meniscus Root Tear: A Matched-Cohort Controlled Study With 2 Years of Follow-up

Background: Increased varus alignment of the lower extremity is known to be a poor prognostic factor for the surgical repair for a medial meniscus root tear (MMRT). However, given the concept of constitutional varus, which is present in a substantial portion of the normal population, the generally accepted surgical indication for MMRT concerning a varus alignment of 5° may be unnecessarily narrow. Purpose: To compare the surgical outcomes of arthroscopic transtibial pullout repair of MMRT according to the degree of varus alignment of the lower extremity. Study Design: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3 Methods: Patients who underwent isolated arthroscopic transtibial pullout repair of MMRT between January 2010 and July 2017 at one institution and had a minimum follow-up of 2 years were included in this study. Patients were classified into 1 of 2 groups: the experimental group (n = 22) included patients with a preoperative hip-knee-ankle angle between 5° and 10° varus (mild to moderate varus alignment) and the control group (n = 51) included those with a preoperative hip-knee-ankle angle <5° varus (neutral alignment). Clinical scores and radiographic parameters were compared between the groups to assess surgical outcomes, which were statistically matched for potential confounders (age, body mass index, the severity of cartilage lesion) by use of the inverse probability of treatment weighting. A noninferiority trial was performed comparing the experimental and control groups in terms of subjective outcomes (International Knee Documentation Committee subjective and Lysholm scores) and objective outcomes (postoperative medial meniscal extrusion and the rate of osteoarthritis progression). Results: There were no statistically significant differences in surgical outcomes between the groups in subjective and objective aspects, which were consistent before and after inverse probability of treatment weighting. Apart from the clinical improvement observed in both groups, overall degenerative changes in the knee were found, although progression rates did not differ between the groups. In terms of the noninferiority trial, the overall surgical outcomes in the experimental group were not inferior to those in the control group. Conclusion: The short-term surgical outcomes of arthroscopic transtibial pullout repair for MMRT of patients with mild to moderate varus alignment were not inferior to but rather comparable with those with neutral alignment in terms of subjective and objective aspects. Therefore, it would be inappropriate to exclude patients with a diagnosis of MMRT from being indicated for the surgery simply because of mild to moderate varus alignment.