scholarly journals Estimating the value of novel interventions for Parkinson's disease: An early decision-making model with application to dopamine cell replacement

2006 ◽  
Vol 12 (7) ◽  
pp. 443-452 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jonas Hjelmgren ◽  
Ola Ghatnekar ◽  
Jan Reimer ◽  
Martin Grabowski ◽  
Olle Lindvall ◽  
...  
2017 ◽  
Vol 125 (2) ◽  
pp. 131-143 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alice Martini ◽  
Simon J. Ellis ◽  
James A. Grange ◽  
Stefano Tamburin ◽  
Denise Dal Lago ◽  
...  

2015 ◽  
Vol 279 ◽  
pp. 226-233 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chunhua Xi ◽  
Youling Zhu ◽  
Yanfang Mu ◽  
Bing Chen ◽  
Bin Dong ◽  
...  

Brain ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 141 (5) ◽  
pp. 1455-1469 ◽  
Author(s):  
Campbell Le Heron ◽  
Olivia Plant ◽  
Sanjay Manohar ◽  
Yuen-Siang Ang ◽  
Matthew Jackson ◽  
...  

2011 ◽  
Vol 100 (1) ◽  
pp. 173-189 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yilong Ma ◽  
Shichun Peng ◽  
Vijay Dhawan ◽  
David Eidelberg

2015 ◽  
Vol 113 (1) ◽  
pp. 200-205 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kenneth T. Kishida ◽  
Ignacio Saez ◽  
Terry Lohrenz ◽  
Mark R. Witcher ◽  
Adrian W. Laxton ◽  
...  

In the mammalian brain, dopamine is a critical neuromodulator whose actions underlie learning, decision-making, and behavioral control. Degeneration of dopamine neurons causes Parkinson’s disease, whereas dysregulation of dopamine signaling is believed to contribute to psychiatric conditions such as schizophrenia, addiction, and depression. Experiments in animal models suggest the hypothesis that dopamine release in human striatum encodes reward prediction errors (RPEs) (the difference between actual and expected outcomes) during ongoing decision-making. Blood oxygen level-dependent (BOLD) imaging experiments in humans support the idea that RPEs are tracked in the striatum; however, BOLD measurements cannot be used to infer the action of any one specific neurotransmitter. We monitored dopamine levels with subsecond temporal resolution in humans (n = 17) with Parkinson’s disease while they executed a sequential decision-making task. Participants placed bets and experienced monetary gains or losses. Dopamine fluctuations in the striatum fail to encode RPEs, as anticipated by a large body of work in model organisms. Instead, subsecond dopamine fluctuations encode an integration of RPEs with counterfactual prediction errors, the latter defined by how much better or worse the experienced outcome could have been. How dopamine fluctuations combine the actual and counterfactual is unknown. One possibility is that this process is the normal behavior of reward processing dopamine neurons, which previously had not been tested by experiments in animal models. Alternatively, this superposition of error terms may result from an additional yet-to-be-identified subclass of dopamine neurons.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document