Computerized Provider Order Entry and Patient Safety

2006 ◽  
Vol 53 (6) ◽  
pp. 1169-1184 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christoph U. Lehmann ◽  
George R. Kim
CJEM ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 18 (4) ◽  
pp. 264-269 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrew Gray ◽  
Christopher M.B. Fernandes ◽  
Kristine Van Aarsen ◽  
Melanie Columbus

AbstractObjectivesComputerized provider order entry (CPOE) has been established as a method to improve patient safety by avoiding medication errors; however, its effect on emergency department (ED) flow remains undefined. We examined the impact of CPOE implementation on three measures of ED throughput: wait time (WT), length of stay (LOS), and the proportion of patients that left without being seen (LWBS).MethodsWe conducted a retrospective cohort study of all ED patients of 18 years and older presenting to London Health Sciences Centre during July and August 2013 and 2014, before and after implementation of a CPOE system. The three primary variables were compared between time periods. Subgroup analyses were also conducted within each Canadian Triage and Acuity Scale (CTAS) level (1–5) individually, as well as for admitted patients only.ResultsA significant increase in WT of 5 minutes (p=0.036) and LOS of 10 minutes (p=0.001), and an increase in LWBS from 7.2% to 8.1% (p=0.002) was seen after CPOE implementation. Admitted patients’ LOS increased by 63 minutes (p<0.001), the WT of CTAS 3 and 5 patients increased by 6 minutes (p=0.001) and 39 minutes (p=0.005), and LWBS proportion increased significantly for CTAS 3–5 patients, from 24.3% to 42.0% (p<0.001) for CTAS 5 patients specifically.ConclusionsCPOE implementation detrimentally impacted all patient flow throughput measures that we examined. The most striking clinically relevant result was the increase in LOS of 63 minutes for admitted patients. This raises the question as to whether the potential detrimental effects to patient safety of CPOE implementation outweigh its benefits.


2020 ◽  
Vol 27 (6) ◽  
pp. 924-928
Author(s):  
Emilie Fortman ◽  
A Zachary Hettinger ◽  
Jessica L Howe ◽  
Allan Fong ◽  
Zoe Pruitt ◽  
...  

Abstract Objective We sought to determine rates of computerized provider order entry (CPOE) patient identity verification and when and where in the ordering process verification occurred. Materials and Methods Fifty-five physicians from 4 healthcare systems completed simulated patient scenarios using their respective CPOE system (Epic or Cerner). Eye movements were recorded and analyzed. Results Across all participants patient id was verified significantly more often than not (62.4% vs 37.6%). Vendor A had significantly higher verification rates than not; vendor B had no difference. Participants using vendor A verified information significantly more often before signing the order than after (88.4% vs 11.6%); there was no difference in vendor B. The banner bar was the most frequent verification location. Discussion Factors such as CPOE design, physician training, and the use of a simulated methodology may be impacting verification rates. Conclusions Verification rates vary by CPOE product, and this can have patient safety consequences.


2012 ◽  
Vol 59 (6) ◽  
pp. 1247-1255 ◽  
Author(s):  
Erika L. Abramson ◽  
Rainu Kaushal

2011 ◽  
Vol 7 (4) ◽  
pp. 218-222 ◽  
Author(s):  
Allen R. Chen ◽  
Christoph U. Lehmann

Implementation of computerized provider order entry required extensive customization but improved patient safety in a highly complex pediatric oncology environment.


2011 ◽  
Vol 02 (04) ◽  
pp. 522-533 ◽  
Author(s):  
L. Fabrizio ◽  
S.H. Shaha ◽  
S.K. Magid ◽  
S.L. Perlman

Summary Objective: Medication dosing errors are of particular concern in hospitalized children. Avoidance of such errors is essential to quality improvement and patient safety. Computerized provider order entry (CPOE) systems with clinical decision support (CDS) have the potential to reduce medication errors. The objective of this study was to evaluate provider response to the dosing alerts in a CPOE system with CDS for pediatric inpatients and to identify differences in provider response based on clinician specialty. Patients and methods: We conducted a retrospective analysis of all medication dosing alerts over a 1-year period (January 1 through December 31, 2008) for all pediatric inpatients at Hospital for Special Surgery. Alerts were analyzed with respect to medication dosing, prescriber, and action taken by the prescriber after the alert was triggered (i.e., accepted suggested change, ignored recommendation/overrode, or cancelled the order). Results: During the study period, 18,163 medication orders were placed and 1,024 dosing alerts were fired. Overdosing of medications accounted for 91% of the alerts and underdosing 9%. The pediatric-trained providers ignored more alerts and cancelled fewer orders than the non-pediatric-trained providers (p<0.001). Both groups changed the order similarly based on CDS recommendations. Conclusions: Differences in response to CDS were found between pediatric-trained and non-pediatric-trained providers caring for pediatric patients; however, both groups changed orders based on CDS similarly. CPOE with built-in CDS may be of particular value when providers with different specialties and types of training are caring for pediatric patients.


Author(s):  
Mahtab Kasaei ◽  
Fahimeh Sadeghi ◽  
Sakineh Saghaeiannejad ◽  
Vahideh Shirzad ◽  
Nahid Tavakoli ◽  
...  

2008 ◽  
Vol 15 (4) ◽  
pp. 453-460 ◽  
Author(s):  
P. Bonnabry ◽  
C. Despont-Gros ◽  
D. Grauser ◽  
P. Casez ◽  
M. Despond ◽  
...  

2015 ◽  
Vol 84 (12) ◽  
pp. 1085-1093 ◽  
Author(s):  
Brian M. Dekarske ◽  
Christopher R. Zimmerman ◽  
Robert Chang ◽  
Paul J. Grant ◽  
Bruce W. Chaffee

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document