Core stability, shoulder peak torque and function in throwing athletes with and without shoulder pain

2018 ◽  
Vol 34 ◽  
pp. 36-42 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lívia Silveira Pogetti ◽  
Theresa Helissa Nakagawa ◽  
Giovanna Prado Conteçote ◽  
Paula Rezende Camargo
2021 ◽  
pp. 026921552199095
Author(s):  
Danilo Harudy Kamonseki ◽  
Letícia Bojikian Calixtre ◽  
Rodrigo Py Gonçalves Barreto ◽  
Paula Rezende Camargo

Objective: To systematically review the effectiveness of electromyographic biofeedback interventions to improve pain and function of patients with shoulder pain. Design: Systematic review of controlled clinical trials. Literature search: Databases (Medline, EMBASE, CINAHL, PEDro, CENTRAL, Web of Science, and SCOPUS) were searched in December 2020. Study selection criteria: Randomized clinical trials that investigated the effects of electromyographic biofeedback for individuals with shoulder pain. Patient-reported pain and functional outcomes were collected and synthesized. Data synthesis: The level of evidence was synthesized using GRADE and Standardized Mean Differences and 95% confidence interval were calculated using a random-effects inverse variance model for meta-analysis. Results: Five studies were included with a total sample of 272 individuals with shoulder pain. Very-low quality of evidence indicated that electromyographic biofeedback was not superior to control for reducing shoulder pain (standardized mean differences = −0.21, 95% confidence interval: −0.67 to 0.24, P = 0.36). Very-low quality of evidence indicated that electromyographic biofeedback interventions were not superior to control for improving shoulder function (standardized mean differences = −0.11, 95% confidence interval: −0.41 to 0.19, P = 0.48). Conclusion: Electromyographic biofeedback may be not effective for improving shoulder pain and function. However, the limited number of included studies and very low quality of evidence does not support a definitive recommendation about the effectiveness of electromyographic biofeedback to treat individuals with shoulder pain.


Neurosurgery ◽  
2000 ◽  
Vol 47 (6) ◽  
pp. 1452-1452 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kimberly S. Harbaugh ◽  
Rand Swenson ◽  
Richard L. Saunders

ABSTRACT OBJECTIVE AND IMPORTANCE The ability to diagnose peripheral nerve disorders is dependent on knowledge of the anatomic course and function of the nerves in question. The classic teaching regarding the suprascapular nerve (SScN) is that it has no cutaneous branches, despite the fact that a cutaneous branch was first reported in the anatomic literature 20 years ago. CLINICAL PRESENTATION We describe a case of a 35-year-old male patient who presented with right shoulder pain and atrophy and weakness of the right supra- and infraspinatus muscles. During the examination, he was also noted to have an area of numbness involving the right upper lateral shoulder region. Electrical study results were consistent with SScN entrapment at the suprascapular notch. INTERVENTION The patient underwent surgical decompression 7 months after the onset of his symptoms. The patient noted resolution of his shoulder pain immediately after the procedure, and his shoulder sensory disturbance had improved by 2 weeks. At 9 months after surgery, he remained pain-free, his shoulder sensation was normal, and his motor abnormalities had improved significantly. CONCLUSION This case provides clinical evidence for the presence of a cutaneous branch of the SScN, as described in cadaveric studies. Although shoulder numbness demands a search for alternative diagnoses, it does not necessarily exclude the diagnosis of SScN entrapment.


1984 ◽  
Vol 148 (4) ◽  
pp. 478-482 ◽  
Author(s):  
Steven O. Short ◽  
Jory N. Kaplan ◽  
George E. Laramore ◽  
Charles W. Cummings

2016 ◽  
Vol 25 ◽  
pp. e98
Author(s):  
E. Barrett ◽  
M.O' Keeffe ◽  
K.O' Sullivan ◽  
K. McCreesh ◽  
J. Lewis

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document