Range of motion and adjacent level degeneration after lumbar total disc replacement

2006 ◽  
Vol 6 (3) ◽  
pp. 242-247 ◽  
Author(s):  
Russel C. Huang ◽  
Patrick Tropiano ◽  
Thierry Marnay ◽  
Federico P. Girardi ◽  
Moe R. Lim ◽  
...  
2004 ◽  
Vol 4 (5) ◽  
pp. S87-S88 ◽  
Author(s):  
Russel Huang ◽  
Federico Girardi ◽  
Moe Lim ◽  
Frank Cammisa ◽  
Patrick Tropiano ◽  
...  

Spine ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 43 (20) ◽  
pp. 1395-1400 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jack E. Zigler ◽  
Scott L. Blumenthal ◽  
Richard D. Guyer ◽  
Donna D. Ohnmeiss ◽  
Leena Patel

SAS Journal ◽  
2008 ◽  
Vol 2 (4) ◽  
pp. 184-188 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joshua D. Auerbach ◽  
Surena Namdari ◽  
Andrew H. Milby ◽  
Andrew P. White ◽  
Sudheer C. Reddy ◽  
...  

2016 ◽  
Vol 40 (2) ◽  
pp. E8 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ralf Wagner ◽  
Menno Iprenburg ◽  
Albert E. Telfeian

The proposed advantages of total disc replacement (TDR) over fusion in the lumbar spine are the preservation of motion and the avoidance of adjacent-level disease. One of the complications inherent in TDR is the possibility of vertebral body fracture due to trauma or a malpositioned implant. The resulting dilemma is that posterior decompression of the displaced bone fragment could then have a destabilizing effect and possibly require fusion, thus obviating the benefit of an arthroplasty procedure. In this study, the authors describe the technical considerations and feasibility of the treatment of a postoperative L-5 paresis that resulted from a dislocated bone fragment at L4–5 during a 2-level lumbar TDR.


Spine ◽  
2006 ◽  
Vol 31 (10) ◽  
pp. E291-E297 ◽  
Author(s):  
Moe R. Lim ◽  
Randall T. Loder ◽  
Russel C. Huang ◽  
Stephen Lyman ◽  
Kai Zhang ◽  
...  

2004 ◽  
Vol 4 (5) ◽  
pp. S48-S49 ◽  
Author(s):  
Russel Huang ◽  
Federico Girardi ◽  
Frank Cammisa ◽  
Moe Lim ◽  
Patrick Tropiano ◽  
...  

2007 ◽  
Vol 7 (2) ◽  
pp. 131-138 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dong-Hyun Kim ◽  
Kyeong-Sik Ryu ◽  
Moon-Kyu Kim ◽  
Chun-Kun Park

Object. The purpose of this prospective controlled study was to evaluate possible factors that could affect postoperative segmental range of motion (ROM) after lumbar total disc replacement (TDR) using the ProDisc II prosthesis. Methods. Thirty-two consecutive patients with intractable discogenic pain underwent lumbar TDR using the Pro-Disc II prosthesis, 30 of whom were followed up for at least 24 months. Segmental ROM was assessed preoperatively and every 6 months postoperatively using dynamic x-ray films. Segmental ROM at the reference level was assessed in relation to patient age, sex, body mass index (BMI), levels with implants, preoperative ROM, prosthesis size, and prosthesis position. Results. At the last follow-up visit, mean ROM of the disc prostheses was significantly increased from 4.23 ±3.12° to 6.81 ±3.76° at L3–4, and from 3.66 ±2.47° to 6.09 ±2.11° at L4–5. Mean ROM at L5–S1, however, was decreased from 3.12 ±1.56° to 2.86 ±1.26° (p > 0.05). This difference in the changes in postoperative ROM between L5–S1 and the other operated levels was the only statistically significant factor (p = 0.025) among the variables related to the postoperative ROM that the authors assessed, but other factors such as patient age, sex, BMI, disc height, and the size and position of the prosthesis were not related to segmental ROM. Conclusions. The data demonstrate that after TDR using the ProDisc II prosthesis, ROM of the prosthesis at L5–S1 is significantly lower compared with ROM at the other levels. In preserving ROM, the advantage of lumbar TDR using the ProDisc II might be minimal at L5–S1. Among the variables related to postoperative ROM, the level at which the ProDisc II prosthesis was implanted was the only one found to be statistically significant.


2012 ◽  
Vol 17 (6) ◽  
pp. 504-511 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jack E. Zigler ◽  
Jamieson Glenn ◽  
Rick B. Delamarter

Object The authors report the 5-year results for radiographically demonstrated adjacent-level degenerative changes from a prospective multicenter study in which patients were randomized to either total disc replacement (TDR) or circumferential fusion for single-level lumbar degenerative disc disease (DDD). Methods Two hundred thirty-six patients with single-level lumbar DDD were enrolled and randomly assigned to 2 treatment groups: 161 patients in the TDR group were treated using the ProDisc-L (Synthes Spine, Inc.), and 75 patients were treated with circumferential fusion. Radiographic follow-up data 5 years after treatment were available for 123 TDR patients and 43 fusion patients. To characterize adjacent-level degeneration (ALD), radiologists at an independent facility read the radiographic films. Adjacent-level degeneration was characterized by a composite score including disc height loss, endplate sclerosis, osteophytes, and spondylolisthesis. At 5 years, changes in ALD (ΔALDs) compared with the preoperative assessment were reported. Results Changes in ALD at 5 years were observed in 9.2% of TDR patients and 28.6% of fusion patients (p = 0.004). Among the patients without adjacent-level disease preoperatively, new findings of ALD at 5 years posttreatment were apparent in only 6.7% of TDR patients and 23.8% of fusion patients (p = 0.008). Adjacent-level surgery leading to secondary surgery was reported for 1.9% of TDR patients and 4.0% of fusion patients (p = 0.6819). The TDR patients had a mean preoperative index-level range of motion ([ROM] of 7.3°) that decreased slightly (to 6.0°) at 5 years after treatment (p = 0.0198). Neither treatment group had significant changes in either ROM or translation at the superior adjacent level at 5 years posttreatment compared with baseline. Conclusions At 5 years after the index surgery, ProDisc-L maintained ROM and was associated with a significantly lower rate of ΔALDs than in the patients treated with circumferential fusion. In fact, the fusion patients were greater than 3 times more likely to experience ΔALDs than were the TDR patients. Clinical trial registration no.: NCT00295009.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document