Facet joint contact pressure is not significantly affected by ProDisc cervical disc arthroplasty in sagittal bending: a single-level cadaveric study

2012 ◽  
Vol 12 (10) ◽  
pp. 949-959 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joel A. Bauman ◽  
Nicolas V. Jaumard ◽  
Benjamin B. Guarino ◽  
Christine L. Weisshaar ◽  
Daniel E. Lipschutz ◽  
...  
2017 ◽  
Vol 42 (videosuppl1) ◽  
pp. V5 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tsung-Hsi Tu ◽  
Jau-Ching Wu ◽  
Henrich Cheng ◽  
Praveen V. Mummaneni

For patients with multilevel cervical stenosis at nonadjacent segments, one of the traditional approaches has included a multilevel fusion of the abnormal segments as well as the intervening normal segment. In this video we demonstrate an alternative treatment plan with tailored use of a combination of anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) and cervical disc arthroplasty (CDA) with an intervening skipped level.The authors present the case of a 72-year-old woman with myeloradiculopathy and a large disc herniation with facet joint degeneration at C3–4 and bulging disc at C5–6. After nonoperative treatment failed, she underwent a single-level ACDF at C3–4 and single-level arthroplasty at C5–6, which successfully relieved her symptoms. No intervention was performed at the normal intervening C4–5 segment. By using ACDF combined with arthroplasty, the authors have avoided a 3-level fusion for this patient and maintained the range of motion of 2 disc levels.The video can be found here: https://youtu.be/OrxcPUBvqLk.


2014 ◽  
Vol 21 (11) ◽  
pp. 1905-1908 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robert W. Tracey ◽  
Daniel G. Kang ◽  
John P. Cody ◽  
Scott C. Wagner ◽  
Michael K. Rosner ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (9) ◽  
pp. S170
Author(s):  
Joseph Drain ◽  
Azeem T. Malik ◽  
Robert C. Ryu ◽  
Varun K. Singh ◽  
Elizabeth Yu ◽  
...  

2011 ◽  
Vol 11 (10) ◽  
pp. S16 ◽  
Author(s):  
Peter McCombe ◽  
Paul Mernagh ◽  
William Sears

2004 ◽  
Vol 17 (3) ◽  
pp. 44-54 ◽  
Author(s):  
Denis J. DiAngelo ◽  
Kevin T. Foley ◽  
Brian R. Morrow ◽  
John S. Schwab ◽  
Jung Song ◽  
...  

An in vitro biomechanical study was conducted to compare the effects of disc arthroplasty and anterior cervical fusion on cervical spine biomechanics in a multilevel human cadaveric model. Three spine conditions were studied: harvested, single-level cervical disc arthroplasty, and single-level fusion. A programmable testing apparatus was used that replicated physiological flexion/extension, lateral bending, and axial rotation. Measurements included vertebral motion, applied load, and bending moments. Relative rotations at the superior, treated, and inferior motion segment units (MSUs) were normalized with respect to the overall rotation of those three MSUs and compared using a one-way analysis of variance with Student–Newman–Keuls test (p < 0.05). Simulated fusion decreased motion across the treated site relative to the harvested and disc arthroplasty conditions. The reduced motion at the treated site was compensated at the adjacent segments by an increase in motion. For all modes of testing, use of an artificial disc prosthesis did not alter the motion patterns at either the instrumented level or adjacent segments compared with the harvested condition, except in extension.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document