Catastrophic airway complication during esophageal stent removal

2018 ◽  
Vol 23 ◽  
pp. 29-30
Author(s):  
Wan Hsin Hsu ◽  
Kuen Bao Chen ◽  
Kin Shing Poon ◽  
Ju Hsin Chang
2017 ◽  
Vol 85 (5) ◽  
pp. AB149
Author(s):  
Tomas DaVee ◽  
Tejas Kirtane ◽  
Aman Deep ◽  
Laura G. Romero ◽  
Liben D. Mahometano ◽  
...  

ASVIDE ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 4 ◽  
pp. 423-423
Author(s):  
Anne S. van Drumpt ◽  
Hidde M. Kroon ◽  
Frank Grüne ◽  
Robert van Thiel ◽  
Manon C. W. Spaander ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shuai Wang ◽  
Meipan Yin ◽  
Yaozhen Ma ◽  
Meng Wang ◽  
Yalin Tong ◽  
...  

Abstract Background: Treatment of complications after esophageal stent placement and methods for removal of stents need to be improved. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of stent-in-stent (SIS) removal of esophageal stent under fluoroscopy.Methods: This study retrospectively analyzed the clinical data of consecutive patients undergoing esophageal stent removal by SIS under fluoroscopy. Under awake condition, local anesthesia, and fluoroscopic monitoring, a second esophageal stent was placed in the first esophageal stent. Four weeks later, both esophageal stents were removed by the SIS technique under fluoroscopy.Results: A total of 12 patients were treated by the SIS removal technique. In 10 patients, the first esophageal stent was easily removed by the SIS method; in the other 2 patients, stent fracture occurred, and some residual nitinol wire had to be removed endoscopically. No serious complications occurred in any patient.Conclusions: The SIS removal technique appears to be a safe and effective method for removal of embedded esophageal metallic stents.


2013 ◽  
Vol 77 (3) ◽  
pp. 496-497 ◽  
Author(s):  
Albert J. Bredenoord ◽  
Jacques J. Bergman ◽  
Paul Fockens

2021 ◽  
Vol 4 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 54-56
Author(s):  
D R Lim ◽  
M Tsai ◽  
S E Gruchy ◽  
J Jones ◽  
G Williams ◽  
...  

Abstract Background The COVID-2019 pandemic continues to restrict access to endoscopy, resulting in delays or cancellation of non-urgent endoscopic procedures. A delay in the removal or exchange of plastic biliary stents may lead to stent occlusion with consensus recommendation of stent removal or exchange at three-month intervals [1–4]. We postulated that delayed plastic biliary stent removal (DPBSR) would increase complication rates. Aims We aim to report our single-centre experience with complications arising from DPBSR. Methods This was a retrospective, single-center, observational cohort study. All subjects who had ERCP-guided plastic biliary stent placement in Halifax, Nova Scotia between Dec 2019 and June 2020 were included in the study. DPBSR was defined as stent removal >=90 days from insertion. Four endpoints were assigned to patients: 1. Stent removed endoscopically, 2. Died with stent in-situ (measured from stent placement to documented date of death/last clinical encounter before death), 3. Pending removal (subjects clinically well, no liver enzyme elevation, not expired, endpoint 1 Nov 2020), and 4. Complication requiring urgent reintervention. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis was used to represent duration of stent patency (Fig.1). Results 102 (47.2%) had plastic biliary stents placed between 2/12/2019 and 29/6/2020. 49 (48%) were female, and the median age was 68 (R 16–91). Median follow-up was 167.5 days, 60 (58.8%) subjects had stent removal, 12 (11.8%) died before replacement, 21 (20.6%) were awaiting stent removal with no complications (median 230d, R 30–332), 9 (8.8%) had complications requiring urgent ERCP. Based on death reports, no deaths were related to stent-related complications. 72(70.6%) of patients had stents in-situ for >= 90 days. In this population, median time to removal was 211.5d (R 91-441d). 3 (4.2%) subjects had stent-related complications requiring urgent ERCP, mean time to complication was 218.3d (R 94–441). Stent removal >=90 days was not associated with complications such as occlusion, cholangitis, and migration (p=1.0). Days of stent in-situ was not associated with occlusion, cholangitis, and migration (p=0.57). Sex (p=0.275), cholecystectomy (p=1.0), cholangiocarcinoma (p=1.0), cholangitis (p=0.68) or pancreatitis (p=1.0) six weeks prior to ERCP, benign vs. malignant etiology (p=1.0) were not significantly associated with stent-related complications. Conclusions Plastic biliary stent longevity may have been previously underestimated. The findings of this study agree with CAG framework recommendations [5] that stent removal be prioritized as elective (P3). Limitations include small sample size that could affect Kaplan-Meier survival analysis. Despite prolonged indwelling stent time as a result of COVID-19, we did not observe an increased incidence of stent occlusion or other complications. Funding Agencies None


2021 ◽  
Vol 63 (2) ◽  
pp. 233-234
Author(s):  
Shunsuke Fujii ◽  
Sooyoung Lee ◽  
Kaori Okamura ◽  
Makoto Hayashida ◽  
Keiichiro Mizuno

2015 ◽  
Vol 157 (12) ◽  
pp. 2071-2075 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christian A. Bowers ◽  
Philip Taussky ◽  
Min S. Park ◽  
Jayson A. Neil ◽  
William T. Couldwell

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document