vCJD and blood transfusion: risk assessment in the United Kingdom

2006 ◽  
Vol 13 (5) ◽  
pp. 307-311 ◽  
Author(s):  
S.A. Dobra ◽  
P.G. Bennett
2007 ◽  
Vol 22 (4) ◽  
pp. 186-191 ◽  
Author(s):  
J R H Scurr ◽  
J H Scurr

Objectives: To report the outcome of 100 consecutive medicolegal claims referred to one of the authors (1990–2003) following the development of venous thromboembolism (VTE) in surgical patients. Methods: A retrospective analysis of the experience of a vascular surgeon acting as an expert witness in the United Kingdom. Results: Prophylaxis had been provided to 43 claimants with risk factors, who, unfortunately, still developed a VTE and alleged negligence. Twenty-nine claims involved patients who had not received prophylaxis because they were at low risk. In 25/28 claims where no prophylaxis was provided, despite identifiable VTE risk factors, the claim was successful. Claimants who developed a VTE that had been managed incorrectly were successful whether they had received prophylaxis or not. Settlement amounts, where disclosed, are reported. Conclusions: Failure to perform a risk assessment and to provide appropriate venous thromboprophylaxis in surgical patients is considered negligent. Clinicians looking after all hospitalized patients who are not assessing their patients' risk for VTE and/or not providing appropriate prophylaxis are at risk of being accused of negligence.


2003 ◽  
Vol 7 (51) ◽  
Author(s):  

The first case of variant Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease (vCJD) thought to have been infected via a blood transfusion may have been seen in the United Kingdom


Transfusion ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 51 (8) ◽  
pp. 1872-1873 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anna M. Molesworth ◽  
Jan Mackenzie ◽  
Dawn Everington ◽  
Richard S.G. Knight ◽  
Robert G. Will

Transfusion ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 58 (4) ◽  
pp. 846-853 ◽  
Author(s):  
Elizabeth A. Stokes ◽  
Sarah Wordsworth ◽  
Julie Staves ◽  
Nicola Mundy ◽  
Jane Skelly ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Hussein Ahmad Bataineh ◽  
Sulaiman Humaid Al Harthy ◽  
Raqiya Ali Al Balushi ◽  
Ahmad Omar Albesisi

The study aims to make risk assessment of investment in the United Kingdom so as to open a new branch of a big bank in United Arab Emirate. The findings of the risk assessment recommended to establish the new branch in the UK basing on diverse reasons. Firstly, according to the international monitory fund report, the GDP of the United Kingdom will increase from the financial year 2018 through the financial year 2022. The economy will advance and widen. Plus, the growth in GDP indicate that all sector in economy including the banking sector will also develop. Secondly, according to the UK office Budget Responsibility (ORB) projections, the UK interest rate will rise in the coming four financial years that will surely be reflected on the increase of profitability. Thirdly, the inflation rate in the UK will decrease in the coming four years, which has positive effects on the banking sectors because inflation rate leads to low costs of products and services. Additionally, the GDP per capital of the UK rise in the coming four fiscal years which is healthy for banking sector to be highly productive and profitable. More importantly the population of the UK will increase in the coming four years, which is favourable to the banking sector this means that the number of will increase. Moreover, the bank of England allows all the commercial banks in the country. Another reason that encourage investing in the UK is the advancement in technology. Besides, the most important reason encourage investment in the UK is the country’s system of governance that is a democratic system of leadership that does not hinders private investors unless they violate law. The researchers conclude that they recommend the decision to open the new bank in the UK. Since the benefits supersede the costs. JEL: E22; F21; G21 <p> </p><p><strong> Article visualizations:</strong></p><p><img src="/-counters-/edu_01/0746/a.php" alt="Hit counter" /></p>


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document