scholarly journals Variation in influenza vaccine assessment, receipt, and refusal by the concentration of Medicare Advantage enrollees in U.S. nursing homes

Vaccine ◽  
2022 ◽  
Author(s):  
Patience Moyo ◽  
Elliott Bosco ◽  
Barbara H. Bardenheier ◽  
Maricruz Rivera-Hernandez ◽  
Robertus van Aalst ◽  
...  
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Patience Moyo ◽  
Elliott Bosco ◽  
Barbara H Bardenheier ◽  
Maricruz Rivera-Hernandez ◽  
Robertus van Aalst ◽  
...  

ABSTRACT Background: More older adults enrolled in Medicare Advantage (MA) are entering nursing homes (NHs), and MA concentration could affect vaccination rates through shifts in resident characteristics and/or payer related influences on preventive services use. We investigated whether rates of influenza vaccination and refusal differ across NHs with varying concentrations of MA-enrolled residents. Methods: We analyzed 2014-2015 Medicare enrollment data and Minimum Data Set clinical assessments linked to NH-level characteristics, star ratings, and county-level MA penetration rates. The independent variable was the percentage of residents enrolled in MA at admission and categorized into three groups. We examined three NH-level outcomes: percentage of residents assessed and appropriately provided the influenza vaccine, receiving influenza vaccine, and refusing influenza vaccine. Results: There were 936,513 long-stay residents in 12,384 NHs. Categories for the prevalence of MA enrollment in NHs were low (0% to 3.3%; n=4131 NHs), moderate (3.4% to 18.6%; n=4127 NHs) and high (>18.6%; n=4126 NHs). Adjusting for covariates, influenza vaccination rates among long-stay residents were higher in NHs with moderate (1.7%, P<0.0001), or high (3.1%, P<0.0001) MA versus the lowest prevalence of MA. Influenza vaccine refusal was lower in NHs with moderate (-3.1%, P<0.0001), or high (-4.6% P<0.0001) MA compared with NHs with the lowest prevalence of MA. Among 753,616 short-stay residents in 12,205 NHs, there was no association between MA concentration and influenza vaccination receipt but vaccine refusal was greater in NHs with higher MA prevalence (high or moderate vs. low MA: 5.2%, P<0.0001). Conclusion: The relationship between MA concentration and influenza vaccination measures varied among post-acute and long-term NH residents. As MA takes a larger role in the Medicare program, and more MA beneficiaries enter NHs, there is need to consider how managed care can be leveraged to improve the delivery of preventive services such as influenza vaccinations in NH settings.


2000 ◽  
Vol 125 (2) ◽  
pp. 393-397 ◽  
Author(s):  
Y. DEGUCHI ◽  
Y. TAKASUGI ◽  
K. NISHIMURA

Influenza vaccine effect on the occurrence and severity of influenza virus infection in a population residing in nursing homes for the elderly was studied as a cohort study during an influenza A (H3N2) epidemic in Japan. Of 22462 individuals living in 301 welfare nursing homes, 10739 voluntarily received inactivated, sub-unit trivalent influenza vaccine in a programme supported by the Osaka Prefectural Government. There were statistically significantly fewer cases of influenza, hospital admissions due to severe infection, and deaths due to influenza in the vaccinated cohort compared to the unvaccinated controls. No serious adverse reactions to vaccination were recorded. Thus influenza vaccination is effective for preventing influenza disease in persons aged 65 years and over, and should be an integral part of the care of this population residing in nursing homes.


JAMA ◽  
1985 ◽  
Vol 253 (8) ◽  
pp. 1136 ◽  
Author(s):  
Peter A. Patriarca

2017 ◽  
Vol 1 (suppl_1) ◽  
pp. 442-443
Author(s):  
S. Gravenstein ◽  
J. Ogarek ◽  
M. Taljaard ◽  
L. Han ◽  
H. Davidson ◽  
...  

1985 ◽  
Vol 33 (7) ◽  
pp. 463-466 ◽  
Author(s):  
Peter A. Patriarca ◽  
Judith A. Weber ◽  
Morgan K. Meissner ◽  
Rachel L. Stricof ◽  
Bernadine Dateno ◽  
...  

1990 ◽  
Vol 11 (9) ◽  
pp. 473-478 ◽  
Author(s):  
Matthew L. Cartter ◽  
Philip O. Renzullo ◽  
Steven D. Helgerson ◽  
Stanley M. Martin ◽  
James F. Jekel

Author(s):  
Stefan Gravenstein ◽  
Kevin W McConeghy ◽  
Elie Saade ◽  
H Edward Davidson ◽  
David H Canaday ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Influenza outbreaks in nursing homes pose a threat to frail residents and occur even in vaccinated populations. We conducted a pragmatic cluster-randomized trial comparing adjuvanted trivalent influenza vaccine (aTIV) versus trivalent influenza vaccine (TIV). Here, we report an exploratory analysis to compare the effect of aTIV versus TIV on facility-reported influenza outbreaks. Methods Nursing homes were randomized to offer older residents either aTIV or TIV for the 2016-17 influenza season. The impact of the intent-to-treat vaccine assignment was evaluated for the total number of outbreaks reported from November-March. We collected data according to standard CDC definitions for both suspected outbreaks and those with a laboratory-confirmed case in nursing homes, and adjusted for facility-level vaccination rates and resident characteristics. Results Of 823 randomized nursing homes, 777 (aTIV, n=387; TIV, n=390) reported information on influenza outbreaks. The treatment groups had similar characteristics at baseline except for race/ethnicity: homes assigned to TIV had a higher percentage of African-American residents (18.0% versus 13.7%). There were 133 versus 162 facility-reported suspected influenza outbreaks in aTIV versus TIV facilities respectively, of these 115 versus 140 were laboratory confirmed. The aTIV group experienced a 17% reduction in suspected (rate ratio, RR, 0.83, 95% confidence interval, CI: 0.65, 1.05) and laboratory-confirmed influenza outbreaks (RR 0.83, 95%CI: 0.63, 1.06). Covariate adjustment increased the estimated reduction for suspected outbreaks to 21% (RR 0.79, 95%CI: 0.61, 0.99) and 22% for laboratory confirmed (RR 0.78, 95%CI: 0.60, 1.02). Conclusions In an exploratory analysis of a cluster-RCT we observed 17-21% fewer outbreaks with aTIV than TIV. ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT02882100.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document