Serosurvey for Trichinella in polar bears (Ursus maritimus) from Svalbard and the Barents Sea

2010 ◽  
Vol 172 (3-4) ◽  
pp. 256-263 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kjetil Åsbakk ◽  
Jon Aars ◽  
Andrew E. Derocher ◽  
Øystein Wiig ◽  
Antti Oksanen ◽  
...  
2003 ◽  
Vol 66 (1) ◽  
pp. 107-113 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mette Mauritzen ◽  
Andrew E Derocher ◽  
Olga Pavlova ◽  
Øystein Wiig

2009 ◽  
Vol 18 (4) ◽  
pp. 735-749 ◽  
Author(s):  
E. ZEYL ◽  
J. AARS ◽  
D. EHRICH ◽  
Ø. WIIG

2010 ◽  
Vol 88 (12) ◽  
pp. 1139-1148 ◽  
Author(s):  
E. Zeyl ◽  
D. Ehrich ◽  
J. Aars ◽  
L. Bachmann ◽  
Ø. Wiig

Polar bears ( Ursus maritimus Phipps, 1774) show fidelity to general denning areas in subsequent reproductive events. Studying the level and spatio-temporal scale of denning-area fidelity is critical to determine the adaptability of polar bears to climate change. We used mark–recapture data in conjunction with mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) data to investigate the level of fidelity of polar bears from the Barents Sea population to five maternal denning areas. There was no differentiation in mtDNA haplotype frequencies between denning areas. The fidelity of females to denning areas is at a local geographic scale and small groups of neighboring females (3–13) shared similar haplotypes with higher probability than expected by chance. The transmission of denning-area fidelity is supported by the short distances (≤60.0 km) observed between capture locations of six (out of eight) denning mother–daughter pairs. Moreover, our results suggested that some females (3 out of 13) used different denning areas in subsequent denning events. This behavioral plasticity implies that females are likely to be able to change denning locations if unsuitable ice conditions prevent them from reaching their preferred denning areas. We consider this plasticity an important attribute of polar bears when facing climate change.


1990 ◽  
Vol 8 (2) ◽  
pp. 309-311
Author(s):  
Øystein Wiig ◽  
Vidar Bakken

2003 ◽  
Vol 37 (21) ◽  
pp. 4919-4924 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gro H. Olsen ◽  
Mette Mauritzen ◽  
Andrew E. Derocher ◽  
Eugen G. Sørmo ◽  
Janneche U. Skaare ◽  
...  

Ecography ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 41 (4) ◽  
pp. 567-578 ◽  
Author(s):  
Karen Lone ◽  
Benjamin Merkel ◽  
Christian Lydersen ◽  
Kit M. Kovacs ◽  
Jon Aars

ARCTIC ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 72 (2) ◽  
pp. 197-202 ◽  
Author(s):  
Thomas G. Smith ◽  
Ian Stirling

Harp seals (Pagophilus groenlandicus) that breed in February and March in the White Sea migrate to open water around Svalbard and Franz Josef Land in the Barents Sea, feeding pelagically while following the receding ice edge northward to the edge of the polar pack. Although harp seals are present throughout the area during the summer, they are primarily pelagic and do not appear to be extensively preyed upon by polar bears (Ursus maritimus). However, occasionally, large numbers of harp seals may haul out and rest on the pack ice or feed in the water below the ice and surface to breathe between the floes. When approached by a polar bear while on the ice, harp seals do not exhibit the instant flight response characteristic of the polar bear’s primary prey species, ringed (Pusa hispida) and bearded seals (Erignathus barbatus). In this situation, polar bears may make multiple kills without either consuming their own prey or scavenging seals killed by other bears. This behavior appears not to frighten other nearby harp seals, whether hauled out on the ice or in the water below the floes. These unusual concentrations of harp seals hauled out on sea ice may be related to the distribution and abundance of fish or other epontic prey. Their lack of an escape response to predators on the surface of the sea ice is probably a result of briefly hauling out in large numbers in spring while whelping on the sea ice in areas where the consequences of potential polar bear predation are insignificant. The rare events of harp seal mortality from bears killing them on the surface of pack ice during the summer do not appear to have a significant impact at the population level of either species.


2020 ◽  
Vol 639 ◽  
pp. 1-19 ◽  
Author(s):  
MA Blanchet ◽  
J Aars ◽  
M Andersen ◽  
H Routti

Polar bears Ursus maritimus are currently facing rapid environmental changes with loss of sea ice and shifts in their prey distribution. Two distinct ecotypes exist in the Barents Sea, where sea ice is decreasing at the highest rate in the Arctic. Coastal bears remain within the Archipelago of Svalbard year-round, whereas offshore bears follow the marginal ice zone (MIZ). We explored these 2 ecotypes’ habitat use, activity and energy needs as well as seasonal variation within these parameters. During the period from 2011-2018, adult female polar bears were equipped with GPS collars and activity sensors (n = 84); 46 of these were equipped with conductivity switches to record aquatic behaviour. Offshore bears travelled longer distances at a higher speed on land and at sea away from land and had a higher activity rate compared to coastal bears. This translated into higher overall energy expenditure. Offshore bears also undertook more distant and energetically costly trips from land to the MIZ, swimming in open water. Both ecotypes showed similar seasonal patterns of activity and movement consistent with their life history linked to sea ice phenology. Despite higher energy expenditure, the offshore strategy seemed to be as profitable as the coastal one as females had marginally better spring body condition, likely due to their specialized high caloric diet of seals throughout the year. However, both ecotypes are currently experiencing habitat changes. Future studies should aim to predict how rapidly declining sea ice in the Barents Sea may challenge polar bears energetically during the coming decades.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document