Minimally Invasive Brachial Plexus and Peripheral Nerve Surgery – Where We Are Now?

2015 ◽  
Vol 84 (2) ◽  
pp. 599
Author(s):  
Lukas Rasulić ◽  
Miroslav Samardžić
2017 ◽  
Vol 12 (01) ◽  
pp. e7-e14 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lukas Rasulic

AbstractPeripheral nerve injuries and brachial plexus injuries are relatively frequent. Significance of these injuries lies in the fact that the majority of patients with these types of injuries constitute working population. Since these injuries may create disability, they present substantial socioeconomic problem nowadays. This article will present current state-of-the-art achievements of minimal invasive brachial plexus and peripheral nerve surgery. It is considered that the age of the patient, the mechanism of the injury, and the associated vascular and soft-tissue injuries are factors that primarily influence the extent of recovery of the injured nerve. The majority of patients are treated using classical open surgical approach. However, new minimally invasive open and endoscopic approaches are being developed in recent years—endoscopic carpal and cubital tunnel release, targeted minimally invasive approaches in brachial plexus surgery, endoscopic single-incision sural nerve harvesting, and there were even attempts to perform endoscopic brachial plexus surgery. The use of the commercially available nerve conduits for bridging short nerve gap has shown promising results. Multidisciplinary approach individually designed for every patient is of the utmost importance for the successful treatment of these injuries. In the future, integration of biology and nanotechnology may fabricate a new generation of nerve conduits that will allow nerve regeneration over longer nerve gaps and start new chapter in peripheral nerve surgery.


Microsurgery ◽  
2010 ◽  
Vol 30 (8) ◽  
pp. 622-626 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ivica Ducic ◽  
Matthew Endara ◽  
Ali Al-Attar ◽  
Humair Quadri

2006 ◽  
Vol 59 (suppl_4) ◽  
pp. ONS-441-ONS-448 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stephen M. Russell ◽  
David G. Kline

Abstract Complication avoidance during peripheral nerve surgery has received little attention in the neurosurgical literature. The goal of our two-part review is to discuss these possible complications, with this initial article highlighting the pitfalls associated with pre- and intraoperative assessment of nerve injuries, as well as the operative nuances used during brachial plexus exploration to minimize complications.


Author(s):  
L. Rasulic ◽  
M. Samardzic ◽  
V. Bascarevic ◽  
M. Micovic ◽  
I. Cvrkota ◽  
...  

Neurosurgery ◽  
2010 ◽  
Vol 66 (4) ◽  
pp. 784-787 ◽  
Author(s):  
Philipp Slotty ◽  
Patrick Kröpil ◽  
Mark Klingenhöfer ◽  
Hans-Jakob Steiger ◽  
Daniel Hänggi ◽  
...  

Abstract OBJECTIVE Exact intraoperative localization of pathologies in spinal and peripheral nerve surgery is not easily achieved. In spinal surgery, intraoperative fluoroscopy is the common method for identification of the level affected. It seldom visualizes the pathology itself and is prone to error in identifying anatomic disorders and superimposing structures. In peripheral nerve surgery, intraoperative fluoroscopy is of little value. The present technical study was conducted to evaluate the feasibility of using a preoperative computed tomography–guided needle marking system, which was previously developed for use in gynecology. The goal was to reduce intraoperative localization error and radiation exposure to patients and operating room personnel. METHODS We used a flexible hooked-wire needle marking system, which has previously been used for preoperative marking of breast lesions, to localize and tag spinal and peripheral nerve pathologies. Marking was carried out under computed tomographic control before surgery. Seven illustrative cases were chosen for this report: 6 patients with disorders of the spine and 1 patient with a peripheral nerve schwannoma. RESULTS No adverse reactions, aside from minor discomfort, were observed in this study. In all cases, the needle could be used as a reliable guide for the surgical approach and led directly to the pathology. In no case was additional intraoperative fluoroscopy needed. The level of radiation exposure to the patient as a result of computed tomography–based marking was similar to or less than that encountered in conventional intraoperative x-ray localization. Radiation exposure to the operating room personnel was eliminated by this method. CONCLUSION Preoperative marking of spinal level or peripheral nerve pathologies with a flexible hooked-wire needle marking system is feasible and appears to be safe and useful for neurosurgical spinal and peripheral procedures.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document