A Ruler for Abdominoplasty Preoperative Markings: The Potential of Best Scar Symmetry

Background. Scar appearance is an important outcome in abdominoplasty surgery, and its asymmetry can have a significant impact on patient and surgeon satisfaction. Here, we compared the scar symmetry reached with a ruler specially designed for the preoperative marking in abdominoplasty to the classic preoperative incision marking. Methods. In this randomized, uni-blind study, 42 patients were allocated to 2 different groups. Group 1 patients had their preoperative marking made by a group of surgeons that used the classic technique as described by Baroudi (n = 21), and Group 2 patients received their preoperative marking by another group of surgeons, using a ruler specially designed to fit the abdominal contour (n = 21). Patients were evaluated using a standard questionnaire that collected information about general patient’s characteristics. On the follow-up period, we evaluated the presence of late surgical complications, need for revision surgery, patient’s satisfaction concerning the postoperative scar, and 4 distances were measured in both groups to assess symmetry. Statistical analysis was made. Results. A total of 42 patients underwent abdominoplasty and were evaluated on the follow-up period (mean time: 4 months). The mean difference of corresponding measures on each side (A-B vs. A-B’ and A-C vs. A-C’) was higher in Group 1 comparing to Group 2. The level of correlation between corresponding measurements was higher in Group 2. Better satisfaction regarding the scar symmetry was achieved in Group 2, being this result statistically significant ( P = .004). Conclusions. The use of the specialized ruler may help surgeons achieve a better scar symmetry with higher patient satisfaction.

The effect of preoperative stoma site marking on risk of stoma-related complications in patients with intestinal ostomy—protocol of a systematic review and meta-analysis

Background An intestinal ostomy is an artificial bowel opening created on the skin. Procedure-related mortality is extremely rare. However, the presence of an ostomy may be associated with significant morbidity. Complications negatively affect the quality of life of ostomates. Preoperative stoma site marking can reduce stoma-related complications and is recommended by several guidelines. However, there is no consensus on the procedure and recommendations are based on low-quality evidence. The objective of the systematic review will be to investigate if preoperative stoma site marking compared to no preoperative marking in patients undergoing intestinal stoma surgery reduces or prevents the rate of stoma-related complications. Methods We will include (cluster-) randomised controlled trials and cohort studies that involve patients with intestinal ostomies comparing preoperative stoma site marking to no preoperative marking and report at least one patient-relevant outcome. For study identification, we will systematically search MEDLINE/PubMed, EMBASE, CENTRAL and CINHAL as well as Google Scholar, trial registries, conference proceedings and reference lists. Additionally, we will contact experts in the field. Two reviewers will independently perform study selection and data extraction. Outcomes will be prioritised based on findings from telephone interviews with five ostomates and five ostomy and wound nurses prior to conducting the review. Outcomes may include but are not limited to stoma-related complications (infection, parastomal abscess, hernia, mucocutaneous separation, dermatological complications, stoma necrosis, stenosis, retraction and prolapse) or other patient-relevant postoperative endpoints (quality of life, revision rate, dependence on professional care, mortality, length of stay and readmission). We will use the ROBINS-I or the Cochrane risk of bias tool to assess the risk of bias of the included studies. We will perform a meta-analysis and assess the certainty of evidence using the GRADE approach. Discussion With the results of the systematic review, we aim to provide information for future clinical guidelines and influence clinical routine with regard to preoperative stoma site marking in patients undergoing ostomy surgery. When the evidence of our systematic review is low, it would still be a useful basis for future clinical trials by identifying data gaps. Systematic review registration PROSPERO registration number: CRD42021226647

Three-Random-Point Marking Method for Toric Intraocular Lens Alignment Using the iTrace Aberrometer

Purpose. To evaluate the clinical outcome of the three-random-point (TRP) marking method for toric intraocular lens (IOL) alignment using the iTrace aberrometer (Tracey Technologies Corp., Houston, TX). Setting. Department of Ophthalmology, Guangdong Eye Institute, Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences, Guangdong Provincial People’s Hospital, Guangzhou, China. Design. Prospective, randomized comparative trial. Method. Thirty eyes of 30 patients undergoing cataract surgery with coexisting corneal astigmatism of over 1.0 D were included in this study. All patients were prospectively randomized into the TRP marking group or slit-lamp horizontal meridian (SHM) marking group. TRP marking involved marking three points randomly in the corneal limbus of the patients and accurately marking the horizontal meridian was not required. The follow-up duration was 3 months after cataract surgery. Results. Fifteen eyes of 15 patients were in the TRP marking group and 15 eyes of 15 patients in the SHM marking group. There was no statistically significant difference in BCVA, UDVA, preexisting corneal astigmatism, or residual astigmatism between the groups before or after surgery P > 0.05 . The mean toric IOL misalignment was lesser but without significance in the TRP marking group than in the SHM marking group after 3 postoperative months (2.66° ± 1.42° versus 3.29° ± 1.67°; P = 0.295 ). Conclusion. The TRP marking method using the iTrace aberrometer is simple and accurate for preoperative marking of toric IOLs. It can eliminate the potential systematic errors resulting from varying head positions during the preoperative keratometry measurement and from manual marking.

Ciliated muconodular papillary tumor with a growing cavity shadow that mimicked colorectal metastasis to the lung: a case report

Background Ciliated muconodular papillary tumor (CMPT) is a rare papillary nodule tumor with benign and malignant characteristics that occurs in the peripheral lung. Case presentation A 70-year-old woman who underwent right hemicolectomy for colorectal cancer (CRC; pT3N0M0, p-stage II) 2 years prior, presented with a sub-centimeter growing cavity shadow on chest computed tomography (CT), which was suspected to be a CRC metastasis. Because positron emission tomography CT suggested there was no other site suspicious of recurrence, thoracoscopic resection with preoperative pleural dye marking was planned to remove the small lesion, which seemed to be hardly palpable on CT. Immediately after pleural dye marking adjacent to the lesion using cone beam CT in the hybrid operating room, thoracoscopic wedge resection was performed and the tumor was finally diagnosed as CMPT, characterized by the papillary growth of mucus-producing cells in the alveoli. Conclusion We resected the non-palpable small lung lesions following preoperative marking using cone-beam CT in the hybrid operating room. This case highlights a rare cavitary CT image of a CMPT mimicking a metastatic lung tumor from colorectal cancer.

Patient-Specific 3D-Printed Rhinoplasty Operative Guides

Three-dimensional (3D) imaging technology has become a popular clinical technology for surgical planning and simulation in rhinoplasty. This technology offers the opportunity to translate a simulated 3D image into a surgical plan in the operating room in a quantitative manner. Herein, we describe a technique for creating patient-specific 3D-printed rhinoplasty marking templates from preoperative 3D imaging. Five adult patients presenting for primary rhinoplasty were recruited as subjects. 3D photographs were captured of each patient, and goals of surgery were digitally simulated based on patient preference. Simulated and baseline digital renderings were exported to a third-party 3D printing company. 3D-printed plastic molds were created to precisely fit the patient’s preoperative nose when overlaid on the dorsum. Molds included windows through the lateral walls corresponding to the preoperative simulation whereby the patient’s desired dorsal height and contour was marked on the skin immediately prior to surgery. 3D image capture, digital rendering, and goals of surgery simulations were created using standard office-based 3D imaging equipment and added an additional 10 minutes the standard preoperative rhinoplasty consultation. Turnaround time was 5 days and cost was $100 per patient. The senior author found the patient-specific marking templates to effectively transfer the patient’s desired dorsal height and contour onto the patient in the form of skin markings. The technique described herein aids quantitative translation of patient goals in dorsal reduction rhinoplasty into the operating room and onto the patient in the form of preoperative marking. The workflow is fast, cost-effective, uses standard office-based technology, and requires little technological expertise.