Correlation between Vascular Geometry Changes and Long-term Outcomes after Enterprise Stent Deployment for Intracranial Aneurysms Located on Small Arteries

Author(s):  
Lei Yao ◽  
Qi Wu ◽  
Bin Yuan ◽  
Lili Wen ◽  
Renxin Yi ◽  
...  
2018 ◽  
Vol 129 (6) ◽  
pp. 1492-1498 ◽  
Author(s):  
Masaomi Koyanagi ◽  
Akira Ishii ◽  
Hirotoshi Imamura ◽  
Tetsu Satow ◽  
Kazumichi Yoshida ◽  
...  

OBJECTIVELong-term follow-up results of the treatment of unruptured intracranial aneurysms (UIAs) by means of coil embolization remain unclear. The aim of this study was to analyze the frequency of rupture, retreatment, stroke, and death in patients with coiled UIAs who were followed for up to 20 years at multiple stroke centers.METHODSThe authors retrospectively analyzed data from cases in which patients underwent coil embolization between 1995 and 2004 at 4 stroke centers. In collecting the late (≥ 1 year) follow-up data, postal questionnaires were used to assess whether patients had experienced rupture or retreatment of a coiled aneurysm or any stroke or had died.RESULTSOverall, 184 patients with 188 UIAs were included. The median follow-up period was 12 years (interquartile range 11–13 years, maximum 20 years). A total of 152 UIAs (81%) were followed for more than 10 years. The incidence of rupture was 2 in 2122 aneurysm-years (annual rupture rate 0.09%). Nine of the 188 patients with coiled UIAs (4.8%) underwent additional treatment. In 5 of these 9 cases, the first retreatment was performed more than 5 years after the initial treatment. Large aneurysms were significantly more likely to require retreatment. Nine strokes occurred over the 2122 aneurysm-years. Seventeen patients died in this cohort.CONCLUSIONSThis study demonstrates a low risk of rupture of coiled UIAs with long-term follow-up periods of up to 20 years. This suggests that coiling of UIAs could prevent rupture for a long period of time. However, large aneurysms might need to be followed for a longer time.


2020 ◽  
pp. 159101992097623
Author(s):  
Qiaowei Wu ◽  
Li Li ◽  
Qiuji Shao ◽  
Tianming Xu ◽  
Kaitao Chang ◽  
...  

Background As a new endovascular reconstruction technique, flow diverter (FD) shows excellent efficacy and safety for treatment of intracranial aneurysms. In a previous multicenter, randomized, controlled, pre-market study, Tubridge FD showed remarkably higher complete occlusion rate compared with traditional stent-assisted coiling. However, a nonsignificant higher complication rate in the Tubridge group was noted. Considering the learning curve, the safety, and long-term outcomes of Tubridge FD should be verified in new prospective, real world, multicenter, post-market trials. Methods This study is a prospective, multicenter, single-arm, post-market clinical trial that evaluates the safety and efficacy of Tubridge in the treatment of patients with intracranial aneurysms by reconstructing parent artery. We expect 200 participants who meet the inclusion and exclusion criteria to be included. Clinical information and angiographic results (Raymond–Roy grading scale, RRGS) will be recorded objectively. The primary endpoint will be the complete occlusion rate of the target aneurysm (RRGS 1) at 12-month follow-up. Secondary endpoints will include the adequate occlusion rate (RRGS 1 & 2) and the rate of major in-stent stenosis (>50%) at 12-month follow-up, technique success rate, changes of modified Rankin Scale before and after the procedure, the rate of aneurysm related disability, neurological mortality, and all-cause mortality within follow-up period. Discussion This post-market, prospective trial may offer more information on the safety and long-term outcomes of Tubridge FD. When the study is complete, the results may provide us a new strategy for the treatment of intracranial aneurysms. Trial registration: WHO-Chinese Clinical Trial Registry: ChiCTR2000032282.


2015 ◽  
Vol 42 (2) ◽  
pp. 72-79 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kenneth J. Sim ◽  
Bernard Yan ◽  
Richard J. Dowling ◽  
Peter J. Mitchell

2012 ◽  
Vol 40 (5) ◽  
pp. 310-316
Author(s):  
Junichi ONO ◽  
Toshio MACHIDA ◽  
Osamu NAGANO ◽  
Atsushi FUJIKAWA ◽  
Kyoko AOYAGI ◽  
...  

2016 ◽  
Vol 96 ◽  
pp. 1-9 ◽  
Author(s):  
Juri Kivelev ◽  
Rokuya Tanikawa ◽  
Kosumo Noda ◽  
Juha Hernesniemi ◽  
Mika Niemelä ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 134 ◽  
pp. e289-e297
Author(s):  
Keitaro Yamagami ◽  
Taketo Hatano ◽  
Ichiro Nakahara ◽  
Akira Ishii ◽  
Mitsushige Ando ◽  
...  

CHEST Journal ◽  
2007 ◽  
Vol 132 (4) ◽  
pp. 542A
Author(s):  
Darpan Bansal ◽  
Raghu Muppidi ◽  
Bradley R. Hughes ◽  
Kunal Sarkar ◽  
Jawahar L. Mehta ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document