Intrafocal Pin Plate Fixation of Distal Ulna Fractures Associated With Distal Radius Fractures

2012 ◽  
Vol 2012 ◽  
pp. 8-9
Author(s):  
J. Adams
Keyword(s):  
Distal Radius ◽  
Plate Fixation ◽  
Distal Radius Fractures ◽  
Radius Fractures ◽  
Distal Ulna ◽  
Ulna Fractures

scholarly journals Outcomes of Distal Ulna Fractures Associated With Operatively Treated Distal Radius Fractures

Hand ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 15 (3) ◽  
pp. 418-421 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kevin F. Lutsky ◽  
Ludovico Lucenti ◽  
Pedro K. Beredjiklian
Keyword(s):  
Distal Radius Fracture ◽  
Distal Radius ◽  
Open Reduction Internal Fixation ◽  
Distal Radius Fractures ◽  
Radius Fracture ◽  
Radius Fractures ◽  
Distal Ulna ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Ulna Fractures ◽  
Surgical Fixation

Background: The purpose of this study was to report outcomes in patients with nonstyloid distal ulna fractures treated in conjunction with open reduction internal fixation (ORIF) of distal radius fractures. Methods: A retrospective review of all patients who had undergone ORIF of a distal radius fracture over a 5-year period at a single institution was performed. Radiographic review was performed to identify patients with a concomitant fracture of the distal ulna. Radiographs were examined to determine whether and how the distal ulna fracture was stabilized and to assess healing of the distal ulna. Range of motion (ROM) was determined by review of the patients’ charts. All skeletally mature patients with distal ulna fractures (not including isolated styloid fractures) undergoing surgical fixation of the distal radius fracture were included. Patients were excluded if follow-up was inadequate. There were 172 fractures of the distal ulna meeting the inclusion criteria. Seven patients were excluded. There were 91 patients treated without ulna fixation (ulna-no) and 74 patients treated with ulna fixation (ulna-yes). Results: Seventy-two (97%) of the ulna-yes patients healed. All patients in the ulna-no group healed. The only significant difference in ROM was in pronation, although the magnitude of this difference was relatively small. Conclusions: Fractures of the distal ulna have high rates of healing and result in equivalent motion regardless of whether the distal ulna is treated operatively. Routine surgical fixation of concomitant distal ulna fractures during distal radius ORIF does not appear to be necessary.

scholarly journals Minimising the risk of extensor pollicis longus rupture following volar plate fixation of distal radius fractures: a cadaveric study

2011 ◽  
Vol 93 (1) ◽  
pp. 57-60 ◽  
Author(s):  
DC Perry ◽  
DMG Machin ◽  
JA Casaletto ◽  
DJ Brown
Keyword(s):  
High Risk ◽  
Distal Radius ◽  
Plate Fixation ◽  
Tendon Injury ◽  
Distal Radius Fractures ◽  
Volar Plate ◽  
Radius Fractures ◽  
Extensor Pollicis Longus ◽  
Fixed Angle ◽  
Volar Plate Fixation

INTRODUCTION Rupture of extensor pollicis longus (EPL) tendon is a recognised complication following volar plate fixation of distal radius fractures, usually from attrition caused by prominent screws. We sought to identify the screw holes in some of the most commonly used plates which may precipitate tendon injury. SUBJECTS AND METHODS Three fixed-angle volar locking plates were sequentially positioned into 18 cadaveric arms. A wire was passed through each of the holes in the plates using a locking guide and the dorsal relationships noted. RESULTS Each plate had specific ‘high-risk’ holes which directed the wire towards the EPL groove. The central screw holes appeared mostly implicated in EPL injury. CONCLUSIONS Awareness of ‘high-risk’ holes and appropriate minor alterations in surgical technique may consequently decrease the incidence of EPL irritation and rupture.

Plate Fixation of Distal Radius Fractures

Hand Clinics ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 37 (2) ◽  
pp. 259-266
Author(s):  
Lili E. Schindelar ◽  
Asif M. Ilyas
Keyword(s):  
Distal Radius ◽  
Plate Fixation ◽  
Distal Radius Fractures ◽  
Radius Fractures

145 Outcomes of Unstable Distal Radius Fractures – A Meta-Analysis of Bridging External Fixation Versus Volar Plating

2021 ◽  
Vol 108 (Supplement_2) ◽  
Author(s):  
J Mulrain ◽  
K Joshi ◽  
F Doyle ◽  
A Abdulkarim
Keyword(s):  
External Fixation ◽  
Distal Radius ◽  
Plate Fixation ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Distal Radius Fractures ◽  
Complication Rates ◽  
Volar Plating ◽  
Radius Fractures ◽  
Increased Risk

Abstract Introduction Distal radius fractures are common and trends for fixation have changed with increased use of volar locking plates in recent time. A meta-analysis will summarise the best evidence for treatment. Method A systematic review was conducted using PRISMA methodology to identify studies that reported clinical and/or radiological outcomes in patients with AO type C distal radius fractures when treated with external fixation versus ORIF. Results 10 randomised trials were included in this review, reporting on 967 patients. Clinical outcomes are in favour of volar plating at 3 months post-operation, but no difference between the two groups is seen at 6 or 12 months. Analysis of complication rates shows a minute increase in risk-ratio for volar plating versus external fixation. Subgroup analysis showed significantly higher re-operations after plate fixation and significantly higher infection after external fixation. Conclusions Internal fixation of complex distal radius fractures confers an improved clinical outcome at early follow up only and a minimally increased risk of complications. The improved grip strength with volar plating is only superior at early follow up and no long-term superiority is seen with either intervention. The type of surgery in this injury type therefore remains at the surgeon’s consideration on a case-by-case basis.

scholarly journals Volar Plate Fixation with AO Distal Radius Plate (DRP) for Distal Radius Fractures

2005 ◽  
Vol 54 (3) ◽  
pp. 611-616
Author(s):  
Kazunobu Arakaki ◽  
Hikaru Tashima ◽  
Yosuke Asahara ◽  
Chikara Deguchi ◽  
Futoshi Kuga
Keyword(s):  
Distal Radius ◽  
Plate Fixation ◽  
Distal Radius Fractures ◽  
Volar Plate ◽  
Radius Fractures ◽  
Volar Plate Fixation

scholarly journals Technique for Intramedullary Stabilization of Ulnar Neck Fractures

Hand ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 13 (5) ◽  
pp. 563-571
Author(s):  
Jack Abboudi ◽  
Scott M. Sandilands ◽  
C. Edward Hoffler ◽  
William Kirkpatrick ◽  
William Emper
Keyword(s):  
Distal Radius ◽  
Kirschner Wire ◽  
Distal Radius Fractures ◽  
Radius Fractures ◽  
Distal Radial Fractures ◽  
Percutaneous Approach ◽  
Intramedullary Stabilization ◽  
Ulna Fractures ◽  
Neck Fracture ◽  
Reproducible Method

Background: Distal ulna fractures at the ulnar neck can be seen in association with distal radius fractures, and multiple techniques have been described to address the ulnar neck component of these injuries. We have found that treatment of ulnar neck fractures can be challenging in terms of anatomy and fracture fixation. We present a new percutaneous fixation technique for ulnar neck fractures commonly seen with distal radius fractures. Technique: Fixation of the ulnar neck fracture is performed after fixation of the distal radius fracture. Our technique uses anterograde intramedullary fixation to stabilize the fracture with a 1.6-mm (0.062 inch) Kirschner wire or a commercially available metacarpal fixation intramedullary nail. The fixation is introduced into the intramedullary space of the ulnar shaft 4 to 6 cm proximal to the fracture at a separate surgical site along the subcutaneous border of the ulna. The fixation is also supported with a sugar-tong splint for the first few weeks after surgery and requires removal of the ulnar implant approximately 10 weeks after implantation. Conclusion: Our technique utilizes a percutaneous approach with minimal fracture exposure. It provides a relatively simple and reproducible method to address ulnar neck fractures commonly seen in association with distal radial fractures.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document