Collateral Flow Predicts Response to Endovascular Therapy for Acute Ischemic Stroke

2011 ◽  
Vol 2011 ◽  
pp. 26-28
Author(s):  
A.A. Rabinstein
Stroke ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 42 (8) ◽  
pp. 2235-2239 ◽  
Author(s):  
Oh Young Bang ◽  
Jeffrey L. Saver ◽  
Suk Jae Kim ◽  
Gyeong-Moon Kim ◽  
Chin-Sang Chung ◽  
...  

Stroke ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 42 (3) ◽  
pp. 693-699 ◽  
Author(s):  
Oh Young Bang ◽  
Jeffrey L. Saver ◽  
Suk Jae Kim ◽  
Gyeong-Moon Kim ◽  
Chin-Sang Chung ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 23 (6) ◽  
Author(s):  
A. Maud ◽  
G. J. Rodriguez ◽  
A. Vellipuram ◽  
F. Sheriff ◽  
M. Ghatali ◽  
...  

Abstract Purpose of Review In this review article we will discuss the acute hypertensive response in the context of acute ischemic stroke and present the latest evidence-based concepts of the significance and management of the hemodynamic response in acute ischemic stroke. Recent Findings Acute hypertensive response is considered a common hemodynamic physiologic response in the early setting of an acute ischemic stroke. The significance of the acute hypertensive response is not entirely well understood. However, in certain types of acute ischemic strokes, the systemic elevation of the blood pressure helps to maintain the collateral blood flow in the penumbral ischemic tissue. The magnitude of the elevation of the systemic blood pressure that contributes to the maintenance of the collateral flow is not well established. The overcorrection of this physiologic hemodynamic response before an effective vessel recanalization takes place can carry a negative impact in the final clinical outcome. The significance of the persistence of the acute hypertensive response after an effective vessel recanalization is poorly understood, and it may negatively affect the final outcome due to reperfusion injury. Summary Acute hypertensive response is considered a common hemodynamic reaction of the cardiovascular system in the context of an acute ischemic stroke. The reaction is particularly common in acute brain embolic occlusion of large intracranial vessels. Its early management before, during, and immediately after arterial reperfusion has a repercussion in the final fate of the ischemic tissue and the clinical outcome.


2013 ◽  
Vol 53 (11) ◽  
pp. 1166-1168
Author(s):  
Hiroshi Yamagami ◽  
Nobuyuki Sakai

2015 ◽  
Vol 72 (10) ◽  
pp. 1101 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mark J. Alberts ◽  
Ty Shang ◽  
Alejandro Magadan

Stroke ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 51 (Suppl_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Rami-James Assadi ◽  
Hongyu An ◽  
Yasheng Chen ◽  
Andria Ford ◽  
Jin-Moo Lee

Introduction: White matter hyperintensity volume (WMHv), a quantitative neuroimaging biomarker of cerebral small vessel disease (CSVD), is associated worse outcomes after ischemic stroke. In this study, we hypothesized that worse outcomes in CSVD patients were due to poor collateral flow during acute ischemia. Methods: 47 patients with acute ischemic stroke (AIS) were prospectively enrolled in this study. Serial MRIs were performed at 3 hours and 30 days after stroke onset. 3-hour FLAIR images were used to determine WMHv, after manually delineating lesions with MIPAV. An index of collateral flow (delayed perfusion to the penumbra) was determined by subtracting core volume (volume of tissue with ADC<600) from the volume of brain tissue with Tmax>2. Patient’s NIHSS was scored at 3 hours and 30 days after stroke onset and the difference was calculated (ΔNIHSS). Log-transformed WMHv was correlated to ΔNIHSS and the collateral flow index, using Pearson correlation. Results: Mean age = 63.9 years (SD 13.5); 37% female; median 3-hour NIHSS = 13 (IQR 6.5-20); median change in NIHSS between 3h and 30d = 4 (IQR: 0-7); median core volume = 13cm3 (IQR 4.3-35.6); median WMHv = 1.257cm3 (IQR 641-3595). WMHv was associated with reduced improvement in ΔNIHSS (R=-0.42, ρ=0.005). Furthermore, WMHv demonstrated a trend for association with poor collateral flow (R=-0.28, ρ=0.062). In this dataset, we will explore the relationship between WMHv and other tissue-based metrics of collateral flow, including the hypoperfusion intensity ratio (HIR) and the cerebral blood volume ratio (rCBV). Conclusions: Our study confirms that patients with CSVD have worse outcomes after AIS. The data also raise the possibility that these worse outcomes in CSVD patients may be mediated by compromised collateral flow in the setting of acute ischemia.


Stroke ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 43 (suppl_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Karl Meisel ◽  
Mahesh Jayaraman ◽  
Jonathan Grossberg ◽  
Anthony Kim

Introduction: Endovascular treatment is an emerging therapy for acute ischemic stroke. There is no clear consensus about how best to select patients that may benefit from intervention. We conducted an exploratory analysis of clinical risk factors to predict mortality after endovascular intervention in order to better understand how to improve outcomes for patients with acute ischemic stroke. Methods: We identified consecutive series of patients treated with endovascular therapy for acute ischemic stroke at two academic hospitals between 2005 to 2010. Key clinical data elements and clinical outcomes at the time of discharge were abstracted from medical records. We evaluated univariate and multivariable associations using logistic regression and compared mean NIH Stroke Scale between those with and without a history of cancer using the t-test. Results: We identified 88 patients who received endovascular intervention with intra-arterial tissue plasminogen activator (t-PA) and/or mechanical thrombectomy. The mean age of the cohort was 68.2 (SD 16.6) and 44 (55%) were female. A total of 23 (26.1%) patients died during the index hospitalization or were discharged to hospice care. A history of cancer was documented in 20 (22.7%) patients. A history of cancer was associated with a 3.2-fold (95% CI 1.1-9.1) higher odds of mortality. This association persisted after adjusting for age greater than 80 years and hypertension (OR of 4.0, 95% CI 1.3-12). The average NIH Stroke Scale was 15.6 in those with cancer compared to 14.6 without (p=0.53). A history of cancer was not associated with parenchymal hemorrhagic transformation (OR 1.2, 95% CI 0.3-4.9), IV tPA (OR 0.5, 95% CI 0.1-2.3), a TIMI score of 2b or 3 (OR 0.5, 95% CI 0.2-1.3), or an internal carotid artery occlusion (OR 1.7, 95% CI 0.5-5.1). Conclusions: In an exploratory analysis of consecutive patients with acute ischemic stroke treated with endovascular therapy, a history of cancer was strongly associated with significantly increased odds of mortality. One possible explanation could be that patients with cancer may have earlier withdrawal of care but the reasons for this observed association are unclear. Further investigation is necessary to verify and explain the reasons for this observation in order to improve outcomes for acute ischemic stroke patients.


Stroke ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 46 (suppl_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Kenichi Todo ◽  
Nobuyuki Sakai ◽  
Tomoyuki Kono ◽  
Taku Hoshi ◽  
Hirotoshi Imamura ◽  
...  

Background and purpose: The outcome after endovascular therapy in acute ischemic stroke is associated with onset-to-reperfusion time (ORT). The Totaled Health Risks in Vascular Events (THRIVE) score is also an important pre-thrapeutic predictor of outcome. We hypothesized that the therapeutic time window is narrower in patients with the higher THRIVE score. Methods: We retrospectively studied consecutive 109 ischemic stroke patients with successful reperfusion after endovascular therapy between October 2005 and March 2014 at a single institute (Kobe City Medical Center General Hospital). Inclusion criteria was as follows: National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) score ≥8, stroke symptom duration ≤8 h, premorbid modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score ≤2, and thrombolysis myocardial infarction score 2-3. We analyzed the relationships of ORT, THRIVE score, and THRIVE+ORT score with good outcome (mRS ≤2 at 3 months). The THRIVE+ORT score was defined as the sum of the THRIVE score and ORT (h). Results: Median ORT was 5.5 h (IQR; 4.4-7.1 h), median THRIVE score was 5 (IQR; 4-6), and median THRIVE+ORT score was 10.8 (IQR; 9.2-12.5). Good outcome rates for patients with ORT ≤4 h, >4 and ≤6 h, >6 and ≤8 h, and >8h were 50.0%, 45.8%, 37.0%, and 21.4%, respectively (p=0.3), those with THRIVE score ≤3, >3 and ≤5, >5 and ≤7, and >7 were 57.1%, 51.4%, 28.3%, and 20.0%, respectively (p9 and ≤11, >11 and ≤13, and >13 were 64.0%, 44.1%, 34.4%, and 16.7%, respectively (p<0.05). Multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed that THRIVE+ORT score was an independent predictor of good outcome after adjusted for THRIVE score (odds ratio [OR], 1.367; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.082-1.728) or after adjusted for ORT (OR, 1.517: 95% CI, 1.160-1.983). Conclusion: Our study showed that THRIVE+ORT score was associated with outcome that was independent from THRIVE score or ORT. This is the first report to suggest that patients with the higher THRIVE score require the shorter ORT for good outcome.


2010 ◽  
Vol 31 (9) ◽  
pp. 1584-1587 ◽  
Author(s):  
Y. Loh ◽  
D.L. McArthur ◽  
P. Vespa ◽  
Z.-S. Shi ◽  
D.S. Liebeskind ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document