Allozymic variation in desert pupfish from natural and artificial habitats: Genetic conservation in fluctuating populations

1998 ◽  
Vol 84 (1) ◽  
pp. 7-15 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jason B. Dunham ◽  
W.L. Minckley
Evolution ◽  
1978 ◽  
Vol 32 (4) ◽  
pp. 723 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael S. Gaines ◽  
Leroy R. McClenaghan Jr. ◽  
Robert K. Rose

Evolution ◽  
1978 ◽  
Vol 32 (4) ◽  
pp. 723-739 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael S. Gaines ◽  
Leroy R. McClenaghan ◽  
Robert K. Rose

2021 ◽  
Vol 168 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Alice E. Hall ◽  
Roger J. H. Herbert ◽  
Richard Stafford

AbstractCoastal habitats are important for commercially exploited and protected species of fish and larger mobile invertebrates. The addition of artificial structures within the marine environment has the potential to alter the connectivity between habitats and to affect metapopulations of a region. Baited remote underwater videos (BRUV) were used to investigate the spatial and seasonal variation in abundance of adult and juvenile mobile species associated with subtidal natural and artificial habitats within Poole Bay on the south coast of England in 2019. Metrics included the relative maximum abundance (MaxN), number of species seen (S), assemblage structure and size range of fish. Higher values of MaxN and S were recorded on artificial structures in the spring and early summer; however, this pattern was reversed by mid-summer and early autumn when more fish were recorded on the natural reefs. Yet overall differences in MaxN and S between habitats were not significant. Differences in assemblage composition between habitats varied monthly, but this was mostly driven by particular sites. Although most fish observed were juveniles, there were some seasonal differences in the size of fish using natural and artificial sites, especially bib (Trisopterus luscus), black bream (Spondyliosoma cantharus), bass (Dicentrarchus labrax) and pollack (Pollachius pollachius). The artificial habitats in this region appeared to be important in certain months, so temporal studies of this type need to be incorporated within surveys, particularly those in proximity to protected areas.


Oikos ◽  
2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Louise B. Firth ◽  
Lois Duff ◽  
Paul E. Gribben ◽  
Antony M. Knights

Author(s):  
Joelma Aparecida Rabelo de Pádua ◽  
Lucas Fernandes Rocha ◽  
Murilo Malveira Brandão ◽  
Fábio de Almeida Vieira ◽  
Dulcinéia de Carvalho

2002 ◽  
Vol 16 (1) ◽  
pp. 129-136 ◽  
Author(s):  
Steven T. Kalinowski ◽  
Robin S. Waples

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document