scholarly journals THE FALLING DROP METHOD FOR DETERMINING SPECIFIC GRAVITY

1926 ◽  
Vol 69 (2) ◽  
pp. 625-640
Author(s):  
Henry G. Barbour ◽  
William F. Hamilton
Keyword(s):  
1963 ◽  
Vol 39 (3) ◽  
pp. 235-240 ◽  
Author(s):  
Martha Winstead ◽  
R. L. Markey
Keyword(s):  

1927 ◽  
Vol 88 (2) ◽  
pp. 91 ◽  
Author(s):  
HENRY G. BARBOUR ◽  
WILLIAM F. HAMILTON
Keyword(s):  

JAMA ◽  
1942 ◽  
Vol 118 (3) ◽  
pp. 248 ◽  
Author(s):  
William F. Hamilton
Keyword(s):  

1972 ◽  
Vol 18 (8) ◽  
pp. 794-799 ◽  
Author(s):  
C Bradley Hager ◽  
John R Brown ◽  
J M Botero

Abstract The performance of a prototype instrument, "CLINILAB Automated Urine Analyzer," for automation and mechanization of urinalysis, was studied. Results of the chemical tests for which the instrument is used—pH, glucose, protein, ketone, bilirubin, and occult blood—were compared to those obtained on the same urine specimens by using "‘Bili-Labstix’ Reagent Strips." Results for specific gravity obtained by using the CLINILAB "falling drop" method were compared to those obtained by refractometer. Of 2,911comparisons between results obtained with the CLINILAB instrument and "Bili-Labstix" for the six different urinary constituents, 98% agreed as to whether the test was positive or negative. Results for pH results were considered to be in agreement if the difference was no greater than one pH unit. For 170 specimens tested, agreement was better between lower specific gravity urines than those of higher specific gravity; results generally agreed within ±0.005 specific gravity units for all urines tested.


Author(s):  
A. Howie ◽  
D.W. McComb

The bulk loss function Im(-l/ε (ω)), a well established tool for the interpretation of valence loss spectra, is being progressively adapted to the wide variety of inhomogeneous samples of interest to the electron microscopist. Proportionality between n, the local valence electron density, and ε-1 (Sellmeyer's equation) has sometimes been assumed but may not be valid even in homogeneous samples. Figs. 1 and 2 show the experimentally measured bulk loss functions for three pure silicates of different specific gravity ρ - quartz (ρ = 2.66), coesite (ρ = 2.93) and a zeolite (ρ = 1.79). Clearly, despite the substantial differences in density, the shift of the prominent loss peak is very small and far less than that predicted by scaling e for quartz with Sellmeyer's equation or even the somewhat smaller shift given by the Clausius-Mossotti (CM) relation which assumes proportionality between n (or ρ in this case) and (ε - 1)/(ε + 2). Both theories overestimate the rise in the peak height for coesite and underestimate the increase at high energies.


1895 ◽  
Vol 39 (1011supp) ◽  
pp. 16162-16162
Author(s):  
T. Lohnstein
Keyword(s):  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document