0454 Successful application of the Schedule for Evaluation of Individual Quality of Life-Direct Weighting (Seiqol-DW) for the amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) individuals under mechanical ventilator

2005 ◽  
Vol 238 ◽  
pp. S214
2021 ◽  
pp. 1-9
Author(s):  
Birgitta Jakobsson Larsson ◽  
Anneli Ozanne ◽  
Karin Nordin ◽  
Ingela Nygren

Abstract Objective Relatives are often central in caring for patients with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS), involving considerable physical, emotional, and social challenges. The aim of this study was to describe individual quality of life (iQoL) among relatives of patients with ALS, from diagnosis through disease progression. Method A total of 31 relatives were included. Data collection was performed at five time points: 1–3 months after their relatives had been diagnosed with ALS and every 6 months for 2 years. Quality of life was determined using the Schedule of Evaluation of Individual Quality of Life — Direct Weighting (SEIQoL-DW), emotional distress with the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS), and the illness severity of the patients was determined with the Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Functional Rating Scale (ALS FRS-R). Results The SEIQoL-DW involves participants nominating the important life areas. The most nominated areas were family, friends, health, and leisure. Although most relatives had overall good and stable iQoL, several had scores indicating poor iQoL on some occasions during the disease trajectory. The relatives’ iQoL correlated with emotional well-being and the patient's physical function at different time points. Significant of result Social relations, emotional well-being, and rapid decline in the patient's physical function influence the relatives’ iQoL. Measuring both emotional well-being and iQoL, with a focus on the relatives’ own descriptions of perceived iQoL and those factors contributing to their iQoL during the disease trajectory may improve the possibility of identifying and supporting those relatives with poor iQoL.


1997 ◽  
Author(s):  
John Browne ◽  
Ciaran A. O'Boyle ◽  
Hannah M. McGee ◽  
Nicholas J. McDonald ◽  
C. R. B. Joyce

QJM ◽  
2004 ◽  
Vol 97 (8) ◽  
pp. 519-524 ◽  
Author(s):  
L.A. Mountain ◽  
S.E. Campbell ◽  
D.G. Seymour ◽  
W.R. Primrose ◽  
M.I. Whyte

Neurology ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 91 (3) ◽  
pp. e258-e267 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jonathan R. Wolpaw ◽  
Richard S. Bedlack ◽  
Domenic J. Reda ◽  
Robert J. Ringer ◽  
Patricia G. Banks ◽  
...  

ObjectiveTo assess the reliability and usefulness of an EEG-based brain-computer interface (BCI) for patients with advanced amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) who used it independently at home for up to 18 months.MethodsOf 42 patients consented, 39 (93%) met the study criteria, and 37 (88%) were assessed for use of the Wadsworth BCI. Nine (21%) could not use the BCI. Of the other 28, 27 (men, age 28–79 years) (64%) had the BCI placed in their homes, and they and their caregivers were trained to use it. Use data were collected by Internet. Periodic visits evaluated BCI benefit and burden and quality of life.ResultsOver subsequent months, 12 (29% of the original 42) left the study because of death or rapid disease progression and 6 (14%) left because of decreased interest. Fourteen (33%) completed training and used the BCI independently, mainly for communication. Technical problems were rare. Patient and caregiver ratings indicated that BCI benefit exceeded burden. Quality of life remained stable. Of those not lost to the disease, half completed the study; all but 1 patient kept the BCI for further use.ConclusionThe Wadsworth BCI home system can function reliably and usefully when operated by patients in their homes. BCIs that support communication are at present most suitable for people who are severely disabled but are otherwise in stable health. Improvements in BCI convenience and performance, including some now underway, should increase the number of people who find them useful and the extent to which they are used.


2021 ◽  
Vol 75 (Supplement_2) ◽  
pp. 7512500033p1
Author(s):  
Addie Broom ◽  
Hannah Prescott ◽  
Mallorie Savage ◽  
Addie Broom ◽  
Emily Crawford ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
pp. 34-39
Author(s):  
Oshin Pawar ◽  
Purva Joneja ◽  
Deepak Singh Choudhary

Introduction: To bring the best outcome from both the sides i.e. the orthodontist and the patient , it is of prime importance to understand certain psychological factors, and to treat every patient with an individualistic approach. The need was to study all such psychological factors and to find a method to deal with the same; to evaluate the psychological factors that influences the self appraisal and individual Quality of life. To compare psychological factor affecting the self appraisal and individual quality of life before treatment and after treatment, to study psychological factors of patients which influences the treatment outcome and to find a method to manage them. Materials and Method: This In-vivo study, includes case study and survey. Two separate sets of questionnaires (before and after undergoing orthodontic treatment) were given to patients. The study also included psychological test scales like OHIP-14 and 12-CSES. The sample size of patient was 150. Result: The study revealed that esthetics (95%) is the main concern for getting treatment especially for female (56%). There is improvement in OHIP and CSES (interval of 12.63, 14.66) score of patients before and after treatment. Patients’ satisfaction (94.7%) increases on having healthy orthodontist-patient relationship. Conclusion: Esthetics is the main concern. Most patients wants improvement in smile. Lack of awareness and lack of financial supports is the main reason for delay in getting treatment. The main discomfort about the treatment reported by participants was pain after activation appointments, ulcers and change in food eating habit. The orthodontic therapy improves confidence, satisfaction, individuals’ appraisal and quality of life. There were no variations in response for patients’ satisfaction by gender, age, education or by treatment duration.


2011 ◽  
Vol 45 (1) ◽  
pp. 131-134 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sébastien Montel ◽  
Laurence Albertini ◽  
Elisabeth Spitz

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document