Social Categorization: Implications for Creation and Reduction of Intergroup Bias

Author(s):  
David A. Wilder
Author(s):  
Katharina Janz ◽  
Claudia Buengeler ◽  
Robert A. Eckhoff ◽  
Astrid C. Homan ◽  
Sven C. Voelpel

With demographic change, organizations today are seeing changes in societal make-up translated to the composition of their workforce. In the future, younger and older employees will have to work together synergistically to achieve good performance. The authors argue that it will be largely up to leaders to prevent the negative effects of age diversity, i.e. social categorization and intergroup bias, and to facilitate the positive effects of age diversity, i.e. the sharing of unique knowledge resources held by young and old. The authors argue that certain leadership behaviors and especially their combinations have great promise in leading diverse teams, and highlight why they should be used in conjunction with positive beliefs about diversity.


1990 ◽  
Vol 59 (3) ◽  
pp. 475-486 ◽  
Author(s):  
Charles W. Perdue ◽  
John F. Dovidio ◽  
Michael B. Gurtman ◽  
Richard B. Tyler

2004 ◽  
Vol 7 (3) ◽  
pp. 239-265 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ludwin E. Molina ◽  
Michele A. Wittig ◽  
Michael T. Giang

Author(s):  
Aharon Levy ◽  
John F. Dovidio

Intergroup behavior involves the feelings, perceptions, beliefs, and actions that groups and their members have toward another group and its members. It frequently involves various forms of bias, such as prejudice (negative feelings and evaluations), stereotypes (beliefs about groups and their members), and discrimination (unfair treatment). However, intergroup bias does not necessarily require overtly negative orientations toward another group. Such bias may reflect favorable attitudes toward members of one’s own group (the ingroup) and preferential treatment of them, rather than hostility or ill-treatment of other groups (outgroups). Intergroup behavior can also be positive, representing cooperation (conduct and exchange that benefits both the ingroup and the outgroup) or prosocial behavior (actions that improve the welfare of another group and its members). The nature of intergroup behavior is determined by psychological processes associated with social categorization, by the identification and motivations of group members, and by the consequent relationship between groups. These processes apply to almost any type of group, including but not limited to work teams, divisions within an organization, companies, sport clubs, ethnic groups, countries, religions, and races. Understanding the psychological dynamics of intergroup relations can guide the development of interventions to achieve stable, constructive, and mutually beneficial exchanges between groups and their members.


2008 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrew Scott Baron ◽  
Yarrow Dunham ◽  
Mahzarin Banaji
Keyword(s):  

2014 ◽  
Author(s):  
Regis Caprara ◽  
Kerry Kawakami ◽  
Amanda Williams ◽  
Derek Chung ◽  
Rebecca Vendittelli ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document