Autogenous breast reconstruction with the deep inferior epigastric perforator flap

2003 ◽  
Vol 30 (3) ◽  
pp. 359-369 ◽  
Author(s):  
James E Craigie ◽  
Robert J Allen ◽  
Frank J DellaCroce ◽  
Scott K Sullivan
2014 ◽  
Vol 41 (1) ◽  
pp. 63 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ritwik Grover ◽  
Jonas A Nelson ◽  
John P Fischer ◽  
Stephen J Kovach ◽  
Joseph M Serletti ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 148 (3) ◽  
pp. 357e-364e
Author(s):  
Ariel C. Johnson ◽  
Becky B. T. King ◽  
Salih Colakoglu ◽  
Jerry H. Yang ◽  
Tae W. Chong ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
pp. 1107-1114
Author(s):  
Hinne A. Rakhorst

Microsurgery in general has made dramatic improvements over the past decades. This applies to microsurgery in general and to breast reconstructive surgery especially. The demand for autologous breast reconstruction has risen. Since the introduction of the free transverse rectus abdominis myocutaneous (TRAM) flaps, through the muscle-sparing TRAM, flaps designs have evolved into the current gold standard, the deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP) flap. From experiences and increasing numbers of flap procedures performed by surgeons, techniques became more familiar and part of standard care. These factors gave rise to the development of a growing number of areas of the body where tissues of interest can be harvested using perforator flap-based techniques. This chapter discusses the most common as well as the ‘rising stars’ in terms of flaps to be used as alternative flaps to the DIEP flap for breast reconstruction. It discusses practical issues on dissection as well as donor site morbidity.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document