A comparison of stochastic models that reproduce chain ladder reserve estimates

2000 ◽  
Vol 26 (1) ◽  
pp. 101-107 ◽  
Author(s):  
Thomas Mack ◽  
Gary Venter
2007 ◽  
Vol 37 (01) ◽  
pp. 113-132 ◽  
Author(s):  

Traditional Chain Ladder models are based on a few cells in an upper triangle and often give inaccurate projections of the reserve. Traditional stochastic models are based on the same few summaries and in addition are based on the often unrealistic assumption of independence between the aggregate incremental values. In this paper a set of stochastic models with weaker assumptions based on the individual claims development are described. These models can include information about settlement and can handle seasonal effects, changes in mix of business and claim types as well as changes in mix of claim size. It is demonstrated how the distribution of the process can be specified and especially how the distribution of the reserve can be determined. The method is illustrated with an example.


1993 ◽  
Vol 23 (2) ◽  
pp. 213-225 ◽  
Author(s):  
Thomas Mack

AbstractA distribution-free formula for the standard error of chain ladder reserve estimates is derived and compared to the results of some parametric methods using a numerical example.


1999 ◽  
Vol 29 (2) ◽  
pp. 361-366 ◽  
Author(s):  
Thomas Mack

AbstractIn Mack (1993), a formula for the standard error or chain ladder reserve estimates has been derived. In the present communication, a very intuitive and easily programmable recursive way of calculating the formula is given. Moreover, this recursive way shows how a tail factor can be implemented in the calculation of the standard error.


Risks ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 6 (4) ◽  
pp. 108 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kris Peremans ◽  
Stefan Van Aelst ◽  
Tim Verdonck

The chain ladder method is a popular technique to estimate the future reserves needed to handle claims that are not fully settled. Since the predictions of the aggregate portfolio (consisting of different subportfolios) do not need to be equal to the sum of the predictions of the subportfolios, a general multivariate chain ladder (GMCL) method has already been proposed. However, the GMCL method is based on the seemingly unrelated regression (SUR) technique which makes it very sensitive to outliers. To address this issue, we propose a robust alternative that estimates the SUR parameters in a more outlier resistant way. With the robust methodology it is possible to automatically flag the claims with a significantly large influence on the reserve estimates. We introduce a simulation design to generate artificial multivariate run-off triangles based on the GMCL model and illustrate the importance of taking into account contemporaneous correlations and structural connections between the run-off triangles. By adding contamination to these artificial datasets, the sensitivity of the traditional GMCL method and the good performance of the robust GMCL method is shown. From the analysis of a portfolio from practice it is clear that the robust GMCL method can provide better insight in the structure of the data.


Risks ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 7 (4) ◽  
pp. 102 ◽  
Author(s):  
Massimo De Felice ◽  
Franco Moriconi

We present an approach to individual claims reserving and claim watching in general insurance based on classification and regression trees (CART). We propose a compound model consisting of a frequency section, for the prediction of events concerning reported claims, and a severity section, for the prediction of paid and reserved amounts. The formal structure of the model is based on a set of probabilistic assumptions which allow the provision of sound statistical meaning to the results provided by the CART algorithms. The multiperiod predictions required for claims reserving estimations are obtained by compounding one-period predictions through a simulation procedure. The resulting dynamic model allows the joint modeling of the case reserves, which usually yields useful predictive information. The model also allows predictions under a double-claim regime, i.e., when two different types of compensation can be required by the same claim. Several explicit numerical examples are provided using motor insurance data. For a large claims portfolio we derive an aggregate reserve estimate obtained as the sum of individual reserve estimates and we compare the result with the classical chain-ladder estimate. Backtesting exercises are also proposed concerning event predictions and claim-reserve estimates.


2007 ◽  
Vol 37 (1) ◽  
pp. 113-132 ◽  
Author(s):  

Traditional Chain Ladder models are based on a few cells in an upper triangle and often give inaccurate projections of the reserve. Traditional stochastic models are based on the same few summaries and in addition are based on the often unrealistic assumption of independence between the aggregate incremental values. In this paper a set of stochastic models with weaker assumptions based on the individual claims development are described. These models can include information about settlement and can handle seasonal effects, changes in mix of business and claim types as well as changes in mix of claim size. It is demonstrated how the distribution of the process can be specified and especially how the distribution of the reserve can be determined. The method is illustrated with an example.


Author(s):  
Kris Peremans ◽  
Stefan Van Aelst ◽  
Tim Verdonck

The chain ladder method is a popular technique to estimate the future reserves needed to handle claims that are not fully settled. Since the predictions of the aggregate portfolio (consisting of different subportfolios) in general differ from the sum of the predictions of the subportfolios, a general multivariate chain ladder (GMCL) method has already been proposed. However, the GMCL method is based on the seemingly unrelated regression (SUR) technique which makes it very sensitive to outliers. To address this issue a robust alternative is introduced which estimates the SUR parameters in a more outlier resistant way. With the robust methodology it is possible to detect which claims have an abnormally large influence on the reserve estimates. We introduce a simulation design to generate artificial multivariate run-off triangles based on the GMCL model and illustrate the importance of taking into account contemporaneous correlations and structural connections between the run-off triangles. By adding contamination to these artificial datasets, the sensitivity of the traditional GMCL method and the good performance of the robust GMCL method is shown. From the analysis of a portfolio from practice it is clear that the robust GMCL method can provide better insight in the structure of the data.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document