61: Conventional and Machine Learning Analyses to Differentiate Systematic Versus Random Inter-Fractional Changes in a Cohort of 250 Head and Neck Cancer Patients

2021 ◽  
Vol 163 ◽  
pp. S75
Author(s):  
Nabhya Harjai ◽  
Sarah Weppler ◽  
Craig A. Beers ◽  
Lukas V. Dyke ◽  
Colleen Schinkel ◽  
...  
2019 ◽  
Vol 105 (1) ◽  
pp. E139-E140 ◽  
Author(s):  
A.P. Wojcieszynski ◽  
W. La Cava ◽  
B.C. Baumann ◽  
J.N. Lukens ◽  
A. Fotouhi Ghiam ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 2021 ◽  
pp. 1-9
Author(s):  
Roberta Carbonara ◽  
Pierluigi Bonomo ◽  
Alessia Di Rito ◽  
Vittorio Didonna ◽  
Fabiana Gregucci ◽  
...  

Background. Radiation-induced toxicity represents a crucial concern in oncological treatments of patients affected by head and neck neoplasms, due to its impact on survivors’ quality of life. Published reports suggested the potential of radiomics combined with machine learning methods in the prediction and assessment of radiation-induced toxicities, supporting a tailored radiation treatment management. In this paper, we present an update of the current knowledge concerning these modern approaches. Materials and Methods. A systematic review according to PICO-PRISMA methodology was conducted in MEDLINE/PubMed and EMBASE databases until June 2019. Studies assessing the use of radiomics combined with machine learning in predicting radiation-induced toxicity in head and neck cancer patients were specifically included. Four authors (two independently and two in concordance) assessed the methodological quality of the included studies using the Radiomic Quality Score (RQS). The overall score for each analyzed study was obtained by the sum of the single RQS items; the average and standard deviation values of the authors’ RQS were calculated and reported. Results. Eight included papers, presenting data on parotid glands, cochlea, masticatory muscles, and white brain matter, were specifically analyzed in this review. Only one study had an average RQS was ≤ 30% (50%), while 3 studies obtained a RQS almost ≤ 25%. Potential variability in the interpretations of specific RQS items could have influenced the inter-rater agreement in specific cases. Conclusions. Published radiomic studies provide encouraging but still limited and preliminary data that require further validation to improve the decision-making processes in preventing and managing radiation-induced toxicities.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document