Can mental health treatment be effectively delivered in primary care? A primer for employee benefit design, decision makers, and an outcome research example

2004 ◽  
pp. 343-375 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ralph Swindle ◽  
Lisa Harris ◽  
Kurt Kroenke ◽  
Wansu Tu ◽  
X. Zhou
Keyword(s):  
Mental Health ◽  
Primary Care ◽  
Outcome Research ◽  
Mental Health Treatment ◽  
Decision Makers ◽  
Design Decision ◽  
Employee Benefit ◽  
Health Treatment ◽  
Benefit Design

scholarly journals Mental Health Treatment Provided by Primary Care Psychologists in the Netherlands

2013 ◽  
Vol 64 (1) ◽  
pp. 94-97 ◽  
Author(s):  
Peter F. M. Verhaak ◽  
Hans Kamsma ◽  
Anneke van der Niet
Keyword(s):  
Mental Health ◽  
Primary Care ◽  
The Netherlands ◽  
Mental Health Treatment ◽  
Health Treatment

scholarly journals Mental Health Treatment Preferences of Older and Younger Primary Care Patients

2004 ◽  
Vol 34 (3) ◽  
pp. 219-233 ◽  
Author(s):  
Julie Loebach Wetherell ◽  
Robert M. Kaplan ◽  
Gene Kallenberg ◽  
Timothy R. Dresselhaus ◽  
William J. Sieber ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Mental Health ◽  
Primary Care ◽  
Mental Health Treatment ◽  
Treatment Preferences ◽  
Health Treatment ◽  
Primary Care Patients

Physicians’ Influence on Primary Care Patients’ Reluctance to Use Mental Health Treatment

2014 ◽  
Vol 65 (4) ◽  
pp. 541-545 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tzipi Hornik-Lurie ◽  
Yaacov Lerner ◽  
Nelly Zilber ◽  
Marjorie C. Feinson ◽  
Julie G. Cwikel
Keyword(s):  
Mental Health ◽  
Primary Care ◽  
Mental Health Treatment ◽  
Health Treatment ◽  
Primary Care Patients

Gender- and Trauma-Related Predictors of Use of Mental Health Treatment Services Among Primary Care Patients

2006 ◽  
Vol 57 (10) ◽  
pp. 1505-1509 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jon D. Elhai ◽  
Sarah L. Patrick ◽  
Susan Anderson ◽  
Jeffrey S. Simons ◽  
B. Christopher Frueh
Keyword(s):  
Mental Health ◽  
Primary Care ◽  
Mental Health Treatment ◽  
Health Treatment ◽  
Treatment Services ◽  
Primary Care Patients

scholarly journals Evidence-Based Approaches to Suicide in Older Adults—Collaborative Care

2020 ◽  
Vol 4 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 625-625
Author(s):  
Michael Schoenbaum
Keyword(s):  
Mental Health ◽  
Older Adults ◽  
Primary Care ◽  
Suicidal Ideation ◽  
Collaborative Care ◽  
Mental Health Treatment ◽  
Evidence Based ◽  
Care Model ◽  
Health Treatment ◽  
Collaborative Care Model

Abstract This individual symposium abstract will focus another evidence-based approach to mental health treatment and in older adults, the collaborative care model. Collaborative care is a consultation-based approach in primary care that has been described with multiple clinical trials, with significant benefit for access and treatment. The Prevention of Suicide in Primary Care Elderly: Collaborative Trial (PROSPECT) using the collaborative care model found that those older adults receiving the intervention had a higher utilization of mental health treatment (psychotherapy and/or antidepressant treatment) and had a 2.2 times greater decline in suicidal ideation over 24 months. The authors will describe the utility of using the collaborative care model on the identification of suicidal ideation and subsequent mental health treatment for older adults. The authors will also share about challenges and successes related to collaborative care implementation in healthcare settings for older adults, and relevant policy and financing components for the model.

Dr. Szasz or Dr. Seuss: Whose Right to Refuse Mental Health Treatment?

1981 ◽  
Vol 9 (3) ◽  
pp. 283-303
Author(s):  
Grant H. Morris
Keyword(s):  
Mental Health ◽  
Medical Treatment ◽  
Mental Health Treatment ◽  
Psychiatric Treatment ◽  
Decision Makers ◽  
Willingness To Accept ◽  
Health Treatment ◽  
Mental Patients ◽  
Substitute Decision Makers ◽  
The Right

In this article, the author asserts that the right of involuntarily confined mental patients to refuse psychiatric treatment is both legally sound and medically desirable. This right is viewed as one example of the broader right of any patient to deny his consent to proposed medical treatment. The author critiques two devices that are utilized to subvert the right of mental patients to refuse psychiatric treatment: (1) a competency test that equates the patient's competence with his willingness to accept the psychiatrist's proposed therapy, and (2) the appointment of guardians to act as substitute decision-makers for civil and criminal patients who have not been declared incompetent to make treatment decisions.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document