Neonatal Hearing Screening with Otoscopy, Auditory Brain Stem Response, and Otoacoustic Emissions

1995 ◽  
Vol 113 (2) ◽  
pp. P151-P151
Author(s):  
Karen Jo Doyle ◽  
Barbara Burggraaff ◽  
Sharon Fujikawa ◽  
Ju Kim ◽  
Carol MacArthur
2007 ◽  
Vol 135 (5-6) ◽  
pp. 264-268 ◽  
Author(s):  
Snezana Babac ◽  
Dragoslava Djeric ◽  
Zoran Ivankovic

Introduction: Prevalence of sensorineural hearing loss is 1-3 per 1,000 newborns. Transient evoked otoacoustic emission (TEOAE) and automated auditory brain stem responses (AABR) are most frequently used methods in newborn hearing screening programmes. Objective. The aim of this study was to examine hearing function in newborns with and without risk factors for hearing loss. We investigated accuracy and feasibility of two automated technologies: transient otoacoustic emissions (TEOAE) and auditory brain stem response (AABR) in early detection of hearing loss. Method. In prospective study, 907 newborns were tested on both ears with transient evoked otoacoustic emissions (TEOAE). If results were "refer", we performed automated brain stem response (AABR). Two stage screening protocols were used with two screening technologies (TEOAE, AABR). Results. Results showed screening pass of 86.3% of the newborns in the first protocol and 99.3% in the second. Six (0.7%) newborns had positive screening results for hearing loss. They were referred for additional audolologic tests (otoacoustic emissions, tympanometry, and auditory brain stem response) to confirm or exclude hearing loss. Audiologic examination was performed up to the third month of life. We confirmed unilateral sensorineural hearing loss in two babies. Average test time per ear was 21.3?19.4 s for TEOAE and 135.3?67.9 s for AABR. Conclusion TEOAE, AABR tests are confidential, noninvasive and feasible methods and can help to detect hearing impairment.


1997 ◽  
Vol 116 (6) ◽  
pp. 597-603 ◽  
Author(s):  
Karen Jo Doyle ◽  
Barbara Burggraaff ◽  
Sharon Fujikawa ◽  
Ju Kim ◽  
Carol J. Macarthur

A study was performed to investigate the relationship between external and middle ear factors and hearing screening results by auditory brain stem response (ABR) and transient evoked otoacoustic emissions (EOAEs). The ears of 200 well newborns aged 5 hours to 48 hours underwent screening by ABR and EOAEs, followed by otoscopic examination. The pass rates for ABR and EOAE screening were 88.5% and 79%, respectively. On otoscopic examination, 13% (53 of 400) ears had occluding vernix obscuring the view of the tympanic membrane. Cleaning of vernix was attempted in ears that failed ABR or EOAE screening. Seventeen ears that failed ABR were cleaned, and 12 (71%) of them passed repeat ABR. Thirty-three ears that failed EOAE screening were cleaned, and 22 (67%) of them passed repeat emissions testing. Cleaning vernix increased the pass rates for ABR and EOAE screening to 91.5% and 84%, respectively. Decreased tympanic membrane mobility was found in 9% of ears that could be evaluated otoscopically. Increased failure rates for both ABR and EOAE screening were found in infant ears with decreased tympanic membrane mobility, but significance testing could not be performed because of inadequate sample size. Prevalence of occluding external canal vernix and middle ear effusion as a function of increasing infant age were studied. Implications for newborn hearing screening are discussed.


1985 ◽  
Vol 95 (7) ◽  
pp. 806???810 ◽  
Author(s):  
HIROSHI SHIMIZU ◽  
ROGER J. WALTERS ◽  
MARILEE C. ALLEN ◽  
DAVID W. KENNEDY ◽  
RICKA K. MARKOWITZ ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 124 (6) ◽  
pp. 1667-1675
Author(s):  
Dalian Ding ◽  
Jianhui Zhang ◽  
Wenjuan Li ◽  
Dong Li ◽  
Jintao Yu ◽  
...  

Auditory brain stem response (ABR) is more commonly used to evaluate cochlear lesions than cochlear compound action potential (CAP). In a noise-induced cochlear damage model, we found that the reduced CAP and enhanced ABR caused the threshold difference. In a unilateral cochlear destruction model, a shadow curve of the ABR from the contralateral healthy ear masked the hearing loss in the destroyed ear.


1992 ◽  
Vol 13 (4) ◽  
pp. 223-227 ◽  
Author(s):  
Therese C. Robier ◽  
David A. Fabry ◽  
Marjorie R. Leek ◽  
W. Van Summers

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document