neonatal hearing screening
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

244
(FIVE YEARS 45)

H-INDEX

22
(FIVE YEARS 2)

Healthcare ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 9 (11) ◽  
pp. 1436
Author(s):  
Jose Miguel Sequi-Canet ◽  
Juan Brines-Solanes

Congenital deafness is a major pediatric problem, affecting about 1.5–3 per 1000 newborns. The early treatment through cochlear implantation and auditory rehabilitation has been a historic milestone. Early diagnosis of congenital deafness is an essential requirement to obtain the best results, which is achieved through neonatal screening, a diagnostic practice that we began systematically at the Hospital Clínico in Valencia (Spain) 30 years ago. Neonatal hearing screening is successful in most developed countries. Its implementation has been slow due to the multiple difficulties that its universal application entails since it involves several health professionals and must be carried out, in a short time interval after birth. In addition, it must have a good performance that prevents the overload of other services and that requires experience and continuous adjustments in search of proper protocols. The aim of this review is to shed some light on some key points of neonatal hearing screening, highlighting our experience in the solutions to common problems. We will discuss about techniques, protocols and neonatal or nutritional factors that can influence the screening results. To a summary of our work, an update on the subject is provided with the intention of sharing experiences and facilitating the start-up of the new units.


PLoS ONE ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 16 (8) ◽  
pp. e0256647
Author(s):  
Ola Alqudah ◽  
Safa Alqudah ◽  
Ahmad M. Al-Bashaireh ◽  
Nouf Alharbi ◽  
Alia Mohammad Alqudah

Background Early detection and management of hearing loss are important to develop ordinary speaking language and academic skills during childhood. Lack of knowledge by either parents or health care providers could hinder the process of hearing loss diagnosis, such that the intervention will be less effective. There is little evidence about the knowledge and practice of family physicians regarding hearing screening in Saudi Arabia and worldwide. Objectives This study aimed to assess family physicians’ knowledge, attitudes, and practices related to hearing loss in children. This in turn will help policy makers and educational institutions to establish and promote a program concerned with screening, diagnosis and intervention of paediatric hearing loss. Methods A cross-sectional descriptive study enrolled 133 family physicians working at primary health centres in Saudi Arabia from March 2020 to September 2020. A self-reported questionnaire was used to assess the knowledge, attitudes, and practices of family physicians concerning hearing loss in children. Results The majority of the participants were working under the umbrella of the Ministry of Health and around half of them did not screen any child for hearing loss. Despite that, 91.7% indicated the importance of neonatal hearing screening, 70.7% indicate infant candidacy for cochlear implant and only 33.1% know about the existence of the early hearing detection and intervention (EHDI) governmental program in kingdom of Saudi Arabia (KSA). Participants were able to identify factors associated with hearing loss such as a family history of hearing loss (85.6%), meningitis (75%) and craniofacial anomalies (51.5%). The most frequent specialists for patient referrals were ear nose and throat ENT (75.2%) and audiologists (67.7%). Conclusion This study shows that family physicians have good general background about the benefits of EHDI programs and the management of hearing loss in the paediatric population. However, it also indicated insufficient knowledge in other domains of hearing loss, including assessments and the presence of the EHDI governmental program in KSA. Further actions on the involvement of family physicians in the process of neonatal hearing screening, diagnosis and intervention for hearing impairment are needed.


Author(s):  
Frederic R. E. Acke ◽  
Casper De Vriese ◽  
Helen Van Hoecke ◽  
Els M. R. De Leenheer

Author(s):  
Laura Franco Chiriboga ◽  
Karolina Pessote Sideri ◽  
Sthefany Nathaly Ferraresi Rodrigues Figueiredo ◽  
Elaine Soares Monteiro Pinto ◽  
Luis Miguel Chiriboga Arteta

Cureus ◽  
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Susan Sabbagh ◽  
Marzieh Amiri ◽  
Maryam Khorramizadeh ◽  
Zahra Iranpourmobarake ◽  
Mansoureh Nickbakht

2021 ◽  
Vol 150 ◽  
pp. 104435
Author(s):  
Luíza Silva Vernier ◽  
João Dartora ◽  
Juliana Herbert ◽  
Silvio César Cazella ◽  
Daniela Centenaro Levandowski

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alejandra Itzel Contreras Rivas ◽  
Gaston Eduardo Estudillo Jiménez ◽  
Edgar Flores Molina ◽  
Patricio Guerra Ulloa

Around the world 10 million people have some type or degree of auditory problem, of them, between 200,000 and 400,000 have total deafness. Estimating that a large population presents this problem from birth (61%), with an incidence of 1 to 3 of every 1000 newborns. For this reason, early implementation through the neonatal auditory sieve allows timely detection to respond early to the hearing impairment of the newborn, as the ideal age to carry out rehabilitation with the help of an auditory auxiliary and initiate Language therapy is at six months of age. Most of the international guides for the integral attention to persons with auditory disability it indicates that all newborns should be screened Auditory before his hospital discharge. The prevalence of auditory disturbances in our environment is 0.3%, a proportion that places us above national and global statistics, so it is very important to screen all newborns including those who do not have Apparent risk factors in order to establish the appropriate diagnosis, the necessary treatment and thus avoid delays in neurodevelopment.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document