P3393 Symptomatic type a aortic dissection: in hospital and long-term results

2003 ◽  
Vol 24 (5) ◽  
pp. 653
Author(s):  
R FAVALORO
2018 ◽  
Vol 19 ◽  
pp. e2
Author(s):  
D. Piani ◽  
I. Vendramin ◽  
A. Lechiancole ◽  
V. Ferrara ◽  
M. Meneguzzi ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Mahmoud Alhussaini ◽  
Eric Jeng ◽  
Tomas Martin ◽  
Amber Filion ◽  
Thomas Beaver ◽  
...  

Objective: Valve-sparing root replacement is commonly used for management of aortic root aneurysms in elective setting, but its technical complexity hinders its broader adoption for acute Type-A Aortic Dissection (ATAAD). The Florida Sleeve (FS) procedure is a simplified form of valve sparing aortic root reconstruction that does not require coronary reimplantation. Here, we present our outcomes of the Florida Sleeve (FS) repair in patients with dilated roots in the setting of an ATAAD. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed 24 consecutive patients (2002-2018) treated with FS procedure for ATAAD. Demographic, operative, and postoperative outcomes were queried from our institutional database. Long term follow-up was obtained from clinic visits for local patients, and with telephone and telehealth measures otherwise. Results: Mean age was 49 ± 14 years with 19 (79%) males. Marfan syndrome was present in 4 (16.7%) patients and 14 (58.3) had ≥2+ aortic insufficiency (AI). Nine (37.2%) had preoperative mal-perfusion or shock. The FS was combined with hemi-arch replacement in 15 (62.5%) patients and a zone-2 arch replacement in 9 (37.5%) patients. There were 2 (8.3%) early postoperative mortalities. Median follow-up period was 46 months (range; 0.3-146). The median survival of the entire cohort was 143.4 months. One patient (4.2%) required redo aortic valve replacement for unrelated aortic valve endocarditis at 30 months postoperatively. Conclusion: FS is simplified and reproducible valve-sparing root repair. In appropriate patients, it can be applied safely in acute Stanford type-A aortic dissection with excellent early and long-term results.


2012 ◽  
Vol 43 (2) ◽  
pp. 389-396 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jos A. Bekkers ◽  
Goris Bol Raap ◽  
Johanna J.M. Takkenberg ◽  
Ad J.J.C. Bogers

2014 ◽  
Vol 148 (6) ◽  
pp. 2981-2985 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bartosz Rylski ◽  
Rita K. Milewski ◽  
Joseph E. Bavaria ◽  
Prashanth Vallabhajosyula ◽  
William Moser ◽  
...  

2001 ◽  
Vol 12 (11) ◽  
pp. 661-668
Author(s):  
Yoshihiko Kurimoto ◽  
Mamoru Hase ◽  
Satoshi Nara ◽  
Eichi Narimatsu ◽  
Yasufumi Asai ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
pp. 021849232092874
Author(s):  
Bashi V Velayudhan ◽  
A Mohammed Idhrees

Acute type A aortic dissection remains one of the most challenging condition in cardiothoracic surgery, with a high mortality rate. Various improvements and innovations have happened over the years to better the outcome of this lethal condition. The frozen elephant trunk prosthesis has been developed to negate the long-term complications of acute type A aortic dissection, but at the cost of increased morbidity compared to hemiarch replacement. Although hemiarch and total arch replacement seem have less morbidity than the frozen elephant trunk technique, they do not address the long-term complications of the distal dissected aorta. Few surgeons now suggest hybrid aortic arch repair as a solution for acute type A aortic dissection. The long-term results need to be studied in all procedures before standardizing them. Although multiple strategies are evolving, the short-term goal of acute type A aortic dissection has not changed: to save the patient’s life. The surgical strategy has to be tailored according to the patient’s condition and the surgeon’s experience.


2014 ◽  
Vol 98 (2) ◽  
pp. 582-589 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bartosz Rylski ◽  
Joseph E. Bavaria ◽  
Rita K. Milewski ◽  
Prashanth Vallabhajosyula ◽  
William Moser ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document