On Well-quasi-ordering Finite Sequences

AbstractLet A be the set of all ascending finite sequences (with at least one term) of positive integers. Let s, t ∈ A. Write s ⊲ t if there exist m, n, x1, …, xn such that m < n and x1 < … < xn and s is x1, …, xm and t is x2, x3, …, xn. Call a subset S of A a P-block if, for every infinite ascending sequence x1, x2, … of positive integers, there exists an m such that x1, …, xm belongs to S. A quasi-ordered set Q (i.e. a set on which a reflexive and transitive relation ≤ is defined) is better-quasi-ordered if, for every P-block S and every function f:S → Q, there exist s, t ∈ S such that s ⊲ t and f(s) ≤ f(t). It is proved that any set of (finite or infinite) trees is better-quasi-ordered if T1 ≤ T2 means that the tree T1 is homeomorphic to a subtree of the tree T2. This establishes a conjecture of J. B.Kruskal that, if T1, T2, … is an infinite sequence of trees, then there exist i, j such that i < j and Ti ≤ Tj.

Download Full-text

On well-quasi-ordering transfinite sequences

Mathematical Proceedings of the Cambridge Philosophical Society ◽

10.1017/s0305004100038603 ◽

1965 ◽

Vol 61 (1) ◽

pp. 33-39 ◽

Cited By ~ 55

Author(s):

C. St. J. A. Nash-Williams

Keyword(s):

Finite Subset ◽

Ordered Set ◽

Infinite Sequence ◽

Infinite Subset ◽

Classical Theorem ◽

Transitive Relation ◽

Finite Sequences ◽

One To One ◽

Positive Integers ◽

Quasi Ordering

Abstract. Let Q be a well-quasi-ordered set, i.e. a set on which a reflexive and transitive relation ≤ is defined and such that, for every infinite sequence q1,q2,… of elements of Q, there exist i and j such that i < j and qi ≤ qi. A restricted transfinite sequence on Q is a function from a well-ordered set onto a finite subset of Q. If f, g are restricted transfinite sequences on Q with domains A, B respectively and there exists a one-to-one order-preserving mapping μ of A into B such that f(α) ≤ h(μ(α)) for every α ∈ A, we write f ≤ g. It is proved that this rule well-quasi-orders the set of restricted transfinite sequences on Q. The proof uses the following subsidiary theorem, which is a generalization of a classical theorem of Ramsey (4). Let P be the set of positive integers, and A(I) denote the set of ascending finite sequences of elements of a subset I of P. If s, t∈A(P), write s ≺ t if, for some m, the terms of s are the first m terms of t. Let T1,…,Tn be disjoint subsets of A(P) whose union T does not include two distinct sequences s, t such that s ≺ t. Then there exists an infinite subset I of P such that T ∩ A(I)is contained in a single Tj.

Download Full-text